Search

Nearly 25% of Major Fashion Brands Lack a Decarbonization Plan, Report Finds

We are an online community created around a smart and easy to access information hub which is focused on providing proven global and local insights about sustainability

05 Aug, 2024

This post was originally published on Eco Watch

A new report by Fashion Revolution — What Fuels Fashion? 2024 Edition — has found that nearly a quarter of the biggest fashion brands in the world — like DKNY, Tom Ford and Reebok — have no public decarbonization plan.

The report also revealed the brands lacked transparency in several important areas.

“Nearly a quarter of the world’s biggest fashion brands disclose nothing on decarbonisation, signifying that the climate crisis is not a priority for them,” a press release from Fashion Revolution said.

The fashion industry can be highly polluting, wasteful and destructive to the environment. It is responsible for up to 10 percent of greenhouse gas emissions globally — more than international flights and shipping combined. Left unchecked, its emissions could grow to more than twice that amount.

Fashion is the second-largest consumer of water on the planet, and its polluting wastewater is frequently discharged into rivers and streams.

Nearly all textiles — 85 percent — end up in landfills or the incinerator, creating a colorful pile of microplastic– and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)-laden waste.

The new report ranked and analyzed 250 of the largest fashion brands and retailers on the planet — those who make $400 million or more — based on the public disclosure of their actions and goals on climate, reported The Guardian.

The researchers looked at 70 separate sustainability criteria, including emissions targets, whether fashion companies used renewable energy to power their facilities and supply chain transparency, in order to come up with a decarbonization score.

The average score of the brands examined in the report was 18 percent, with 13 percent of major brands scoring a zero rating, the press release said. The highest score for 2024 was 75 percent.

According to Fashion Revolution, less than half of the brands disclosed a Science Based Targets Initiative that covered the whole value chain.

The majority of companies — 86 percent — are without a public phase-out target for coal, 94 percent do not have a public renewable energy goal and 92 percent lack a renewable electricity objective for their supply chains.

Just 43 percent of brands practice transparency regarding the procurement of energy for their operations, with even fewer — 10 percent — doing so at the supply chain level.

“Additionally, no major fashion brand discloses hourly matched supply chain electricity use. As a result, big fashion’s zero-emissions claims may be disconnected from grid realities, creating a false sense of progress against climate targets,” Fashion Revolution said. “The fashion industry wants to have its cake and eat it too. Most big fashion brands (89%) do not disclose how many clothes they make annually. Alarmingly, nearly half (45%) fail to disclose neither how much they make nor the raw material emissions footprint of what is produced, signalling the industry prioritises resource exploitation whilst avoiding accountability for environmental harms linked to production.”

Tom Ford, DKNY and Reebok all earned a zero percent decarbonization rating in the report, since they had failed to demonstrate how they would eliminate supply chain emissions, The Guardian reported. Dolce & Gabbana and Urban Outfitters were near the bottom as well, both scoring three percent.

The three highest-scoring brands were H&M with a 61 percent rating, Gucci with 74 percent and Puma with 75 percent.

Just four of the brands met the targets for emissions reductions set by the United Nations.

Not only did many brands get low sustainability scores, just 117 of them had decarbonization targets at all. And 42 of those reported an increase in their value chain emissions in comparison with their baseline year.

The authors of the report called on companies to protect textile workers who were frequently being paid poverty-line wages.

“A transformation on the scale necessary to stop climate change often implies losses of jobs and livelihoods, which is why we advocate for a just transition that ensures the people who make our clothes aren’t left behind,” the press release said. “But as fashion races to reach net zero, our report finds that brands aren’t providing sufficient support for their workers. The majority (96%) of the world’s largest fashion brands haven’t publicly committed to a Just Transition strategy and only 4% of brands disclose their efforts to retain and re- and/or up-skill supply chain workers whose jobs are at risk.”

Additionally, the report found that just three percent of the biggest fashion companies disclosed their efforts to provide financial support to workers who experienced impacts of the climate crisis.

“By investing at least 2% of their revenue into clean, renewable energy and upskilling and supporting workers, fashion could simultaneously curb the impacts of the climate crisis and reduce poverty and inequality within their supply chains. Climate breakdown is avoidable because we have the solution – and big fashion can certainly afford it,” said Maeve Galvin, Fashion Revolution’s director of global policy and campaigns, as reported by The Guardian.

The post Nearly 25% of Major Fashion Brands Lack a Decarbonization Plan, Report Finds appeared first on EcoWatch.

Pass over the stars to rate this post. Your opinion is always welcome.
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

You may also like…

ABB receives EPD status for gearless mill drive ring motor

ABB receives EPD status for gearless mill drive ring motor

ABB has gained Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) status for its Gearless Mill Drive (GMD) ring motor — technology used to drive large grinding mills in the mining industry.

An EPD is a standardised document that provides detailed information about the environmental impact of a product throughout its life cycle. Based on a comprehensive Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) study, the EPD highlights ABB’s commitment to transparency, environmental responsibility and supporting customers in making informed decisions on sustainability in their supply chains.

ABB analysed the environmental impact of a ring motor across its entire life cycle from supply chain and production to usage and end-of-life disposal. The study was conducted for a ring motor of a semi-autogenous grinding (SAG) mill with an installed power of 24 MW and was based on a reference service life of 25 years.

“Sustainability is at the core of our purpose at ABB, influencing how we operate and innovate for customers,” said Andrea Quinta, Sustainability Specialist at ABB. “By earning the Environmental Product Declaration for our ring motor, we emphasise our environmental stewardship and industry leadership for this technology. We adhered to the highest standards throughout this process, as we do in the ABB Ring Motor factory every day. This recognition highlights to the mining industry what they are bringing into their own operations when they work with ABB.”

The comprehensive LCA was conducted at ABB’s factory in Bilbao, Spain, and was externally verified and published in accordance with international standards ISO 14025 and ISO 14040/14044. It will remain valid for five years.

The ring motor, a key component of the GMD, is a drive system without any gears where the transmission of the torque between the motor and the mill is done through the magnetic field in the air gap between the motor stator and the motor rotor. It optimises grinding applications in the minerals and mining industries by enabling variable-speed operation, leading to energy and cost savings.

The full EPD for the ABB GMD Ring Motor can be viewed on EPD International.

Bee Hotels Can Help Native Pollinators Recover in the Wake of Climate-Fueled Wildfires: Study

Bee Hotels Can Help Native Pollinators Recover in the Wake of Climate-Fueled Wildfires: Study

Wild pollinator populations are declining all over the world, with increasingly severe climate change-fueled wildfires threatening their survival. These intense wildfires are also putting long-term ecosystem health and biodiversity at risk. Bee hotels are artificial nesting structures that have been specially designed to house cavity-nesting species. Often placed in backyards or gardens, they provide safe […]
The post Bee Hotels Can Help Native Pollinators Recover in the Wake of Climate-Fueled Wildfires: Study appeared first on EcoWatch.

0 Comments