Search

Eco nappies could release nutrients into the earth

We are an online community created around a smart and easy to access information hub which is focused on providing proven global and local insights about sustainability

26 Mar, 2024

This post was originally published on Sustainability Matters

Nappies and sanitary pads present a problem for sustainability because their absorbent parts and waterproof layers contain plastics and other synthetic polymers. When thrown away, they can take hundreds of years to decompose.

Now, researchers have found a way to replace these problematic materials with porous components made from the protein biomass often discarded by the food and agricultural industries. These components are sustainable and biodegradable, and could potentially allow future nappies and sanitary pads to be flushed down a toilet or used as fertiliser.

Antonio Capezza, a researcher in the polymeric materials division at KTH Royal Institute of Technology in Sweden, presented these findings at the spring meeting of the American Chemical Society (ACS), held in March 2024.

Capezza said that in Europe, regulations discourage the use of certain petroleum-based plastics in disposable goods; however, there aren’t clear guidelines or regulations to ban these plastics in nappies, sanitary pads and other disposable sanitary items because a good replacement hasn’t been available. “But we’re hoping to change that with our protein-based materials,” he said.

Capezza is collaborating with researchers at KTH, the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences and other institutions, including Simón Bolívar University in Venezuela, the University of Tokyo in Japan and the University of Seville in Spain.

Ironically, the project had its origins in a demonstration designed to teach students what can go wrong in the lab. Capezza was showing them how to make bioplastic filaments using proteins. To mimic the impact of unwanted humidity, he added wet cotton, which caused the mixture to foam. Once the product dried, the material had become super porous, meaning it could sop up liquid like a sponge.

“So it was sort of an accident, but a good one, because that led us to an entirely new line of research,” he said.

While there are already some cotton-based alternatives to plastic sanitary products on the market, these rely on virgin cotton and may need bleaching or other chemical treatment for their production. Capezza’s team identified a more sustainable material source in the proteins and other natural molecules left over from food and agricultural production that might otherwise be landfilled or incinerated, including zein from corn, gluten from wheat and natural antioxidant extracts.

The researchers mixed the proteins together in different proportions and added water and bicarbonates, such as baking soda, as foaming agents; the sweetener glycerol as a plasticiser; and natural extracts as preservatives.

They then used equipment and processing techniques from the plastics industry, including extrusion, to make various components commonly found in pads and nappies. In much the same way as a pasta maker, the extruder enabled the team to produce filaments and flat sheets while simultaneously allowing them to foam the materials. These techniques produced a flat ‘nonwoven’ layer that remained dry to the touch while allowing liquid to rapidly pass through; a fluffy porous material with super-absorbent properties that captured liquid; and waterproof films to protect outer garments.

As a proof of concept, the researchers assembled these components to make protein-based absorbent prototypes that resembled disposable sanitary products. Once exposed to water or soil, the materials completely biodegraded in a few weeks, releasing carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, amino acids and other compounds that nature can reuse as nutrients.

Compost from these products (or any waste produced at the manufacturing stage) could be used to fertilise crops such as corn and wheat, which would in turn provide the starting materials to make new sanitary products. “So it’s a fully circular design,” Capezza said.

The researchers have already shown that plants grow longer leaves and roots when exposed to this compost. “And our tests have shown that because it’s protein based, there’s no risk whatsoever that these products will pollute the soil with microplastics or other unwanted chemicals when they break down,” Capezza added.

While the performance of protein sanitary pads is similar to that of conventional pads, protein nappies aren’t as absorbent as their plastic counterparts. That means protein nappies either need to be thicker, or their formulation needs to be tweaked to improve absorption. To boost liquid uptake and mechanical strength, the researchers are now exploring the addition of lignocellulose, a blend of lignin and cellulose found in plants. This material is a low-value by-product of the farming and forestry sectors. Results to date show its addition is bringing performance close to that of conventional nappies.

The team is now preparing for pilot studies to test the feasibility of scaling up production. Additional evaluations, including human skin irritation tests, will need to be done before any of these products can go on the market, Capezza said.

The research was funded by the Bo Rydin Foundation and Formas, a Swedish government research council for sustainable development. The team has filed a patent application on the technology and process.


 

Image credit: iStock.com/Collab Media

Pass over the stars to rate this post. Your opinion is always welcome.
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

You may also like…

More Than 700 Wildlife Species Discovered in Cambodian Mangrove Forest

More Than 700 Wildlife Species Discovered in Cambodian Mangrove Forest

In one of the most detailed surveys ever undertaken, hundreds of animal species — from birds to primates to web-footed wildcats — have been discovered in a Cambodian mangrove forest. Team leader Stefanie Rog — a conservation biologist and senior program manager with Fauna & Flora International, which funded the study — recorded an astounding […]
The post More Than 700 Wildlife Species Discovered in Cambodian Mangrove Forest appeared first on EcoWatch.

Concerning level of 'forever chemicals' in global source water

Concerning level of 'forever chemicals' in global source water

A recent UNSW-led international study has assessed the levels of per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in surface and ground water around the globe.

PFAS are a group of over 14,000 human-made chemicals that have been popular since the 1950s thanks to their diverse abilities in resisting heat, water, grease and stains. They have commonly been found in household products like non-stick frying pans, clothing, cosmetics, insecticides and food packaging, as well as specialty industry products like firefighting foam.

Despite their utility, the chemicals have a more sinister reputation. Dubbed ‘forever chemicals’, they are notorious for not degrading any further once they’re in the environment — or in people’s bodies.

Concerningly, the study found that much of our global source water exceeds PFAS safe drinking limits.

“We already knew that PFAS is pervasive in the environment, but I was surprised to find out the large fraction of source waters that are above drinking water advisory recommendations,” said UNSW Engineering Professor Denis O’Carroll, senior author of the study.

“We’re talking above 5%, and it goes over 50% in some cases.”

The research team pulled together PFAS measurements from sources around the world, including government reports, databases and peer-reviewed literature. Altogether, they collated more than 45,000 data points, which span roughly 20 years. Their study is reportedly the first to quantify the environmental burden of PFAS on a global scale.

High concentrations of PFAS were found in Australia, with many locations above recommended drinking water levels. This tended to be in areas where firefighting foams had been used in the past, like military institutions and fire training facilities.

O’Carroll stressed that these PFAS traces are found in source water, such as dams, and not drinking water itself, which goes through treatment plants, some of which are designed to reduce the amount of chemicals such as PFAS in our water before it comes out of the tap. However, some water providers — eg, Sydney Water — don’t routinely measure the broad range of PFAS potentially in our drinking water, O’Carroll said.

“Drinking water is largely safe, and I don’t hesitate drinking it,” he said. “I also don’t suggest that bottled water is better, because it doesn’t mean that they’ve done anything differently than what comes out of the tap.

“But I certainly think that monitoring PFAS levels and making the data easily available is worthwhile.”

Most people in Australia are likely to have low levels of PFAS in their bodies. The potential health risks are poorly understood and haven’t been agreed on universally. While an Australian Government expert health panel found there is “limited to no evidence” that PFAS poses clinically significant harm to human health, peak bodies in the US and Europe suggest that PFAS is linked to adverse health outcomes, and last year the WHO declared PFOA, a type of PFAS, a category one human carcinogen.

There is also a lack of consensus as to the acceptable level of PFAS in drinking water, with Australia allowing significantly higher limits than the US, and Canada being much stricter than both countries.

“There’s debate about what level PFAS should be regulated to,” O’Carroll said. “Australia has much higher limits than the US, but the question is why.

“Both health bodies would have different reasoning for that, and there’s not a really strong consensus here.”

The study suggests that actual PFAS pollution in global water resources could be higher than suspected. This is partly because only a limited number of the 14,000 PFAS in existence are monitored and regulated, and also because the levels of PFAS in consumer products are higher than expected.

“There’s a real unknown amount of PFAS that we’re not measuring in the environment,” O’Carroll said. “Commercial products like garments and food packaging have a lot more PFAS in them than we realise.

“This means we’re likely underestimating the environmental burden posed by PFAS.”

The team is now attempting to quantify the level of PFAS from commercial products in the environment. It is also working to develop technologies that can degrade PFAS in drinking water systems, and looking at developing predictive models that determine where PFAS will go in the environment.

“Part of this is figuring out how PFAS will associate with different parts of the environment and our bodies — proteins, for example,” O’Carroll said.

These new studies will be in progress over the next two years, with the aim of being completed by 2026. The findings of the current study have been published in Nature Geoscience.

Image credit: iStock.com/LKR Photography

0 Comments