by Komoneed | Apr 18, 2024
A recent UNSW-led international study has assessed the levels of per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in surface and ground water around the globe.
PFAS are a group of over 14,000 human-made chemicals that have been popular since the 1950s thanks to their diverse abilities in resisting heat, water, grease and stains. They have commonly been found in household products like non-stick frying pans, clothing, cosmetics, insecticides and food packaging, as well as specialty industry products like firefighting foam.
Despite their utility, the chemicals have a more sinister reputation. Dubbed ‘forever chemicals’, they are notorious for not degrading any further once they’re in the environment — or in people’s bodies.
Concerningly, the study found that much of our global source water exceeds PFAS safe drinking limits.
“We already knew that PFAS is pervasive in the environment, but I was surprised to find out the large fraction of source waters that are above drinking water advisory recommendations,” said UNSW Engineering Professor Denis O’Carroll, senior author of the study.
“We’re talking above 5%, and it goes over 50% in some cases.”
The research team pulled together PFAS measurements from sources around the world, including government reports, databases and peer-reviewed literature. Altogether, they collated more than 45,000 data points, which span roughly 20 years. Their study is reportedly the first to quantify the environmental burden of PFAS on a global scale.
High concentrations of PFAS were found in Australia, with many locations above recommended drinking water levels. This tended to be in areas where firefighting foams had been used in the past, like military institutions and fire training facilities.
O’Carroll stressed that these PFAS traces are found in source water, such as dams, and not drinking water itself, which goes through treatment plants, some of which are designed to reduce the amount of chemicals such as PFAS in our water before it comes out of the tap. However, some water providers — eg, Sydney Water — don’t routinely measure the broad range of PFAS potentially in our drinking water, O’Carroll said.
“Drinking water is largely safe, and I don’t hesitate drinking it,” he said. “I also don’t suggest that bottled water is better, because it doesn’t mean that they’ve done anything differently than what comes out of the tap.
“But I certainly think that monitoring PFAS levels and making the data easily available is worthwhile.”
Most people in Australia are likely to have low levels of PFAS in their bodies. The potential health risks are poorly understood and haven’t been agreed on universally. While an Australian Government expert health panel found there is “limited to no evidence” that PFAS poses clinically significant harm to human health, peak bodies in the US and Europe suggest that PFAS is linked to adverse health outcomes, and last year the WHO declared PFOA, a type of PFAS, a category one human carcinogen.
There is also a lack of consensus as to the acceptable level of PFAS in drinking water, with Australia allowing significantly higher limits than the US, and Canada being much stricter than both countries.
“There’s debate about what level PFAS should be regulated to,” O’Carroll said. “Australia has much higher limits than the US, but the question is why.
“Both health bodies would have different reasoning for that, and there’s not a really strong consensus here.”
The study suggests that actual PFAS pollution in global water resources could be higher than suspected. This is partly because only a limited number of the 14,000 PFAS in existence are monitored and regulated, and also because the levels of PFAS in consumer products are higher than expected.
“There’s a real unknown amount of PFAS that we’re not measuring in the environment,” O’Carroll said. “Commercial products like garments and food packaging have a lot more PFAS in them than we realise.
“This means we’re likely underestimating the environmental burden posed by PFAS.”
The team is now attempting to quantify the level of PFAS from commercial products in the environment. It is also working to develop technologies that can degrade PFAS in drinking water systems, and looking at developing predictive models that determine where PFAS will go in the environment.
“Part of this is figuring out how PFAS will associate with different parts of the environment and our bodies — proteins, for example,” O’Carroll said.
These new studies will be in progress over the next two years, with the aim of being completed by 2026. The findings of the current study have been published in Nature Geoscience.
Image credit: iStock.com/LKR Photography
by Komoneed | Apr 18, 2024
There are many ways to get involved in environmental conservation, such as tree donation, CO2 compensation, participating in planting campaigns, or joining a cooperative forest. We offer guidance!
The post Planting trees for climate protection – these are your options appeared first on GOOD – The search engine for a better world.
by Komoneed | Apr 18, 2024
This post was originally published on We Build ValueL’articolo Australia 2050: a zero-emission economy proviene da We Build...
by Komoneed | Apr 18, 2024
Our editors curate highly rated brands that are first assessed by our rigorous ratings system. Buying through our links may earn us a commission—supporting the work we do. Learn more. Adidas is the second largest activewear brand in the world after competitor Nike. But how ethical is Adidas when it comes to sustainability, labour […]
The post How Ethical Is Adidas? appeared first on Good On You.
by Komoneed | Apr 18, 2024
Researchers from UNSW Sydney have examined the untapped solar potential of residential buildings across Australia. Their report found that people living in apartments, social housing and private rental houses are missing out on $9.3 billion per year in possible cost savings.
While Australia may be a world leader in residential photovoltaic deployment, with rooftop solar installed in almost one in three houses, most of those houses are owner–occupier dwellings — leaving rentals out of the equation.
The report, ‘Rooftop Solar Potential of Australian Housing Stock by Tenure and Dwelling Type’ was commissioned by Solar Citizens and conducted by researchers from UNSW School of Photovoltaic and Renewable Energy Engineering in collaboration with the Australian Photovoltaic Institute. It found total potential for rooftop solar installation is estimated at approximately 61 gigawatts (GW), which could reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 785 megatonnes over the next 20 years.
The research involved an analysis of all residential buildings in Australia in order to estimate how many extra solar panels could be installed on those sites. As of June last year, approximately 15.1 GW of residential solar is installed in Australia.
The report found there is approximately 45.8 GW of unrealised potential solar energy on houses and apartments across the country — three times the number of panels currently installed on roofs. New South Wales, Victoria and Queensland were found to have the highest share of this solar potential across the country.
“Our analysis found the power of solar can deliver average annual household bill savings of $1300 each year,” said Dr Mike Roberts, UNSW Senior Research Fellow and one of the authors on the report.
“Apartments are another housing type where government investment now will pay high dividends in cheaper bills and less emissions for long into the future,” he said.
Apartment buildings are missing out on three gigawatts of solar power, Roberts said. Social housing and the rental sector — which include both houses and apartments — are missing out on more than two gigawatts and 12 GW respectively.
Roberts said apartment residents could be saving an average of $500 to $700 a year on their energy bills and could be paying off the system in five years or less.
“While we have seen recent action on solar for social housing through collaboration between several state and federal governments, this approach should be fast-tracked to a greater number of social homes, given the outstanding cost savings on bills and other benefits delivered,” he said.
The report makes it clear, Roberts said, that certain sectors, such as social housing and rental properties, need targeted incentives to encourage more landlords to consider adopting rooftop solar.
“For rental properties, a big part of the problem is because the cost of installing solar is absorbed by landlords but the benefits go to the tenants,” he said.
“To address this, this report recommends giving tenants increased visibility of the financial benefits of solar which could be reflected in their rental rates — allowing landlords to recoup their investment costs.
“Targeted subsidies, such as Solar Victoria’s Solar Rebates for Rental Scheme, could also incentivise landlords to invest in solar, as could rule changes to allow the associated capital costs to be offset through instant tax write-offs.”
The report also found that closing the solar potential gap would create 240,000 additional job-years of employment in the solar industry, supporting those working in solar sales and installation roles — the equivalent of employing 48,000 people for five years.
“Unlocking this solar potential can return money to people’s pockets, deliver 785 megatonnes in avoided carbon emissions over 20 years and the up-front investment is repaid in bill savings for households within about five years,” said Joel Pringle, National Campaigns Director at Solar Citizens.
“Cleaner, cheaper rooftop solar energy is a win for both energy bill relief and reducing climate pollution. One in three Australian homes has now gone solar; we need greater government support to ensure the financial and health benefits are extended to all Australian households.”
Image credit: iStock.com/Photon-Photos
