Search

Water sustainability issues in green hydrogen production

We are an online community created around a smart and easy to access information hub which is focused on providing proven global and local insights about sustainability

14 Jun, 2024

This post was originally published on Sustainability Matters

Green hydrogen is produced when water electrolysis is powered by renewable energy to split water into hydrogen and oxygen. Green hydrogen can be stored, transported and burned to generate power. Green hydrogen production does not result in carbon emissions.

Green hydrogen is an important technology in the shift towards cleaner energy. It can help reduce carbon emissions in applications and industries that are hard to decarbonise, for instance, by serving as a zero-carbon fuel in the production of energy-intensive materials such as cement, steel and chemicals. Additionally, it can serve as a direct replacement for natural gas in power generation.

Green hydrogen can be turned into higher-value derivatives such as green ammonia, green methanol and Sustainable Aviation Fuel. It can serve as a form of chemical energy storage to complement and provide a reliable alternative to lithium-ion batteries. It can also power zero-emissions vehicles using hydrogen fuel cells.

Australia has committed over AU$1.3 billion to develop its hydrogen industry as part of efforts to become a renewable energy superpower, decarbonise its economy and increase clean energy exports to contribute to regional and global decarbonisation with concomitant benefits to energy security.

Abundant renewable energy and land are resources that Australia offers to support its ambitions. It will also require an enormous amount of high-quality water for hydrogen production.

Water is required to perform key functions in hydrogen production including:

  • Critical feed for production.
  • Plant cooling and domestic water.
  • Disposal of rejected water from treatment processes.
  • Salt cavern solution mining for geophysical hydrogen storage.
     

A study in the Journal of Cleaner Production proposes that producing 1 kilogram (kg) of hydrogen through water electrolysis requires 9 litres (L) of ultra-pure water. The total water usage of a hydrogen plant can range from 18 to 36 L/kg of hydrogen, depending on the plant’s configuration.

According to Black & Veatch’s analysis, assuming an electrolyser-specific energy consumption of 55 kilowatt-hours per kilogram (kWh/kg), a 1-gigawatt (GW) hydrogen facility can consume approximately 7 to 15 million L of water per day.

Swinburne University of Technology estimates that about 225,000 megalitres (or 225,000 million litres) of water will be needed for Australia to achieve its AU$50 billion green hydrogen industry. This amount of water is estimated to be around 4% of the amount of water used for Australian crops and pastures in 2019–20, based on Australia Bureau of Statistics data in 2022.

This is a large quantity of water, especially in water-stressed areas.

On top of that, the declining availability of fresh water caused by climate change is making it challenging to manage water resources effectively in water-stressed economies, including Australia. Variable rainfall patterns worsen the impact of drought and aggravate the situation.

Sustainable pathways

In Australia’s arid regions, most available water resources have been allocated for agricultural irrigation and town and city drinking water supplies.

Opting for alternative water supplies, such as desalinated water and recycled wastewater, can sustain hydrogen projects and reduce the withdrawal of existing surface and groundwater resources.

Seawater could be a potential stable supply for hydrogen facilities located near coastal areas, while plants near cities with large, centralised wastewater treatment facilities can turn to recycled wastewater as a viable alternative.

Seawater and recycled wastewater can be treated to the quality needed for hydrogen production. Additionally, the salinity of salt water can be lowered by reverse osmosis. Ultrapure water produced after the final polishing treatment process can then be used for hydrogen production.

As alternative water resources do not deplete existing resources, including local drinking water supplies, they are more likely to be accepted socially. Additionally, water supply alternatives can be recycled back into the hydrogen production process and treated to a higher quality than the original water source.

Regionally, PT Freeport Indonesia (PTFI) appointed Black & Veatch to design and manage the delivery of a seawater desalination plant for its Manyar Smelter in East Java, Indonesia. The seawater desalination plant will support the processing of mine concentrates from the Grasberg mine in West Papua.

Globally, seawater desalination projects that Black & Veatch worked on include the Escondida Water Supply Expansion (EWSE) project at the Minera Escondida mine in Chile and the original Escondida Water Supply (EWS) project.

For Australia’s Bundamba Advanced Water Treatment Plant (AWTP), Black & Veatch and its joint-venture partners designed, constructed and commissioned one of its three water treatment plants on a fast-track schedule. Water treatment steps at the Bundamba AWTP include ultrafiltration membranes, reverse osmosis membranes followed by advanced oxidation using ultraviolet irradiation and hydrogen peroxide.

For Melbourne Water Corporation’s Eastern Treatment Plant (ETP) in Victoria, Black & Veatch selected a process train of ozonation, media filtration, ultraviolet irradiation and chlorination that significantly improved the quality of discharge into the environment. The process produces high-quality recycled water that the community can use.

Creating bankable projects

While desalination offers a sustainable and climate-resilient water supply for hydrogen generation, it also comes with high energy and production costs. Treatment and regulatory permitting can add to the challenges.

Powering desalination plants with renewable energy sources can help to reduce carbon emissions from the desalination process and provide a rainfall-independent water supply that meets environmental and commercial targets.

Another factor to improve project bankability is locating a high-quality water source before constructing the hydrogen plant. This includes siting seawater desalination facilities near coastal areas to reduce water conveyancing costs.

It also includes seeking water recycling and effluent reuse opportunities near major cities where greywater sources and wastewater treatment facilities are commonly located.

Planning for water holistically can reduce the risks associated with resource over-allocation. This strategy includes implementing an integrated water management system that advances the sustainability objectives of Australia’s hydrogen industry.

The system would ideally evaluate the water consumption of hydrogen projects and create plans that balance the requirements of the hydrogen sector and those of local water users.

Equally critical are supportive water management initiatives at the national level, including the use of alternative water sources and simplifying the permitting process for alternative water infrastructure.

Water management and allocation frameworks can also help prioritise the sustainable development of the hydrogen sector.

Planning ahead

The viability of Australia’s hydrogen economy depends on how effectively it manages the competing water demands from various users, including industry, commercial and residential sectors.

Incorporating appropriate technologies for hydrogen manufacturing, alternative water sources and process cooling can help optimise water usage and present opportunities for sustainable development.

To identify the right mix of technologies and scale them, the industry needs partners who can support its strategic decision-making, financial and resource commitments, implementation and execution.

James Currie is Director, Water, Associate Vice President, Australia Pacific at Black & Veatch. Black & Veatch has been supporting Australia’s water infrastructure development for over 40 years and remains committed to it.

Top image credit: iStock.com/Olemedia

Pass over the stars to rate this post. Your opinion is always welcome.
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

You may also like…

Energy Efficiency as an Imperative Climate Strategy

Energy Efficiency as an Imperative Climate Strategy

With mandatory climate statement disclosure rolling out in Australia, businesses need to start reporting on their emissions and sustainability plans for the future. As companies begin assessing the relevant risks and opportunities related to various climate scenarios, energy efficiency presents itself as an immediate climate-strategy with long-term benefits.

Commencing 1 January 2025, businesses that meet two of the three conditions — more than 500 employees, gross assets above $1 billion or $500 million or more in consolidated gross revenue — are required to lodge a climate statement, which discloses their climate-related plans, financial risks and obligations. As part of the gradual roll-out, by 1 July 2027, businesses that meet two of these conditions — more than 100 employees, gross assets above $25 million or exceeding $50 million in consolidated gross revenue — will also be required to report.

This climate statement will need to include the company’s sustainability governance, climate risks and opportunities, including those physical and transition related. They will also need to disclose their Scope 1 and 2 emissions, strategy to decarbonise, and conduct scenario analysis on the short, medium and long term impacts on the business. By the second year of reporting, businesses will also be expected to report on Scope 3 emissions.

Scenario analysis will be based on various assumptions of the state of the climate, one of which includes a possible future where global temperature has increased 2.5°C or more. They will be required to share their climate strategy and steps they are taking long-term in preparation for this scenario.

Common themes within climate strategies will include switching to renewable energy sources, electrifying fleet vehicles, purchasing carbon credits, and carbon capture and storage. Many of these methods look at reducing emissions through the energy source, or targeting the carbon aspect directly; however, climate strategies can also include reducing the amount of energy used. By investing in more energy efficient equipment, sites can maintain production whilst using less energy and producing less emissions.

When increasing energy efficiency and reducing energy consumption first, businesses will see short-term impacts; however, in the long term, they are also improving their foundation for an energy transition. Assuming no other changes, higher energy efficiency can lead to decreased energy demand, allowing for reduced system requirements when specifying and planning for self-generation or energy costs.

To understand what opportunities are available for upgrading to more energy efficient equipment, businesses can start with an energy audit to understand how energy is being consumed across site. Energy audits, like the ABB Energy Appraisal, can provide a roadmap for where and how equipment can be upgraded for the best energy saving potential. An energy audit identifies areas that can be immediately improved with existing equipment on the market, so there is no need to wait for the commercialization or development of more sustainable technology. Going beyond just changing all lights to LEDs, efficiency recommendations may include areas where variable speed drives can be added to control motor speed or upgrading from an IE3 motor to an IE5 ultra-premium efficiency or IE6 hyper-premium efficiency motor to reduce energy losses by 40% or more. This area can often be overlooked on sites as the Minimum Energy Performance Standard (MEPS) in Australia for motors is just IE2.

Mostly used in pumps, compressors, conveyors and fans, motors may seem like a minor part of a site; however, with 45% of the world’s electricity converted into motion by industrial electric motors, there are many opportunities for energy savings. In fact, a recent survey commissioned by ABB IEC Low voltage motors, showed that 92% of surveyed businesses in Australia recognize the important role of electric motors in achieving sustainability targets. In this same survey, participants ranked a reduction in operating cost as a more important driver for investing in energy efficiency than lowering their organization’s emissions. This is because upgrading to newer, more efficient equipment provides benefits beyond just emission reduction. For example, ABB’s Synchronous Reluctance (SynRM) Motors, available in IE5 ultra-premium efficiency or IE6 hyper-premium efficiency, use no rare earth metals or magnets. Running quieter and with bearing temperatures reduced by up to 15°C and winding temperatures by up to 30°, SynRM motors have longer maintenance periods, superior reliability, and contribute to a better operational environment.

Looking ahead, upgrading to an IE5 SynRM motor also provides more visibility into Scope 3 emissions, as SynRM motors meet ABB’s circularity criteria and transparency on environmental impact is provided through Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs).

By requiring companies to disclose their climate information, these new legal requirements are opening the door and facilitating more internal discussions on environmental impact and emission reduction. Whilst mandatory climate reporting is only required of large business entities this year, the progressive roll-out and Scope 3 emission reporting requirements mean that businesses of all sizes in Australia will be impacted by these new requirements. As businesses become more conscious of how sustainability should be integrated into their operations and finances, there is no better time to start investing in energy efficient solutions.

For more information, click here.

Image credit: iStock.com/denizunlusu

0 Comments