Search

The Best and Worst Beauty Brands We Rated in 2024

We are an online community created around a smart and easy to access information hub which is focused on providing proven global and local insights about sustainability

22 Dec, 2024

This post was originally published on Good on You

In 2024, Good On You launched into rating beauty brands. Based on our initial batch of 239 brand ratings—which we first revealed in the Beauty Sustainability Scorecard—today we’re zooming in on the brands that landed at the top and the bottom of the curve. 

Introducing beauty brand ratings

In October, Good On You announced our expansion into rating beauty brands after spending years building the most trusted sustainability brand rating methodology in fashion. We took considerable time to ensure the methodology for this new vertical reflected the nuanced issues in the beauty supply chain. Our expert rating team spent more than a year developing the new methodology and rating the first batch of 239 beauty brands—along the way, consulting industry leaders, assessing the most significant challenges, and outlining best practice across the key pillars of people, the planet, and animals.

As we’ve done in fashion for nearly a decade, we’re only rating beauty brands based on publicly available information about brands to ensure they can be held accountable by everyone—this includes standards and certifications, third-party indices and public reporting, as well as brands’ own disclosures. Transparency is key to securing a more sustainable future, and we’ll never take information into account that brands won’t publish for everyone to see.

What we see are a few small brands ahead of the curve, with more circular and innovative business models. However, large brands tend to lag behind.

We marked the launch by publishing the first 239 brand ratings and our deepest data report to date, the Beauty Sustainability Scorecard, which earned press everywhere from the Financial Times to Vogue Business. The Scorecard included industry-wide performance insights on more than a dozen key issues. We also revealed the best and worst performing brands, both large and small.

Today, we’re taking a closer look at the brands that scored highest and lowest in our first annual beauty list. Note that this list focuses on the beauty sector, where we’re rapidly expanding our coverage with more beauty ratings to come in the new year. As we wrote in the Scorecard: “To be clear, this doesn’t necessarily mean these top rated brands are the most sustainable out there—they’re simply the top performing based on the brands we’ve reviewed so far. What we see are a few small brands ahead of the curve, with more circular and innovative business models. However, large brands tend to lag behind, and even for the smaller number of top rated large brands, they’re still not doing enough to tackle problems such as packaging waste through, say, circular economy principles, which are a couple of the 42 key issues Good On You rates in beauty.”

The role of Good On You’s ratings

A growing number of shoppers are better than ever at seeing through shallow and untrue sustainability claims made by companies in many consumer industries and are using their voices to demand positive change. Their journey often begins with checking a brand’s Good On You rating to get a sense of how the brand performs across its supply chain, not only for a few product-level claims. In the last few years, we’ve observed a growing demand not just for fashion brand ratings, but beauty brands too, and that’s why we branched out—it’s the natural next step in helping you make more informed choices about the products you buy.

Just like our fashion brand ratings, when Good On You’s analysts complete a beauty brand rating, they give the brand a score out of 100, which is an unweighted view of how a brand performs across the three key rating pillars (people, planet, and animals). They’re assessed based only on publicly available information to promote transparency across the beauty industry. We then group brands into a five-point rating scale to help you more easily identify who “We Avoid” (1/5) and who is “Good” (4/5) and “Great” (5/5).

Unfortunately, the full rating distribution in the beauty industry is not looking great: with the complexities of product packaging, ingredient transparency, chemical use, microplastic management, and so much more, the majority—53%—of the 239 brands we rated scored “Not Good Enough”. And just two received our “Great” rating. They’re both small brands, and that echoes something we often see in the fashion industry—large brands, the ones with the most power and influence, aren’t doing enough to improve their sustainability.

Ratings for over 230 beauty brands are now live on the directory and in the app, so it’s easier than ever to compare brands’ impacts on the issues that matter most. But if you’re wondering which brands stand out on both ends of the rating scale, read on to discover the lowest and the highest achievers based on our world-leading methodology.

The large beauty brands ‘We Avoid’

We proportionately apply more demanding standards to large brands as they inherently have greater impacts and influence, but even so, the vast majority of large brands rate poorly, and these are the 10 worst that we’ve rated so far.

Seven of them received exactly zero points—the lowest possible score—for their sustainability efforts. That means they aren’t being transparent and are disclosing little to no information about their practices.

‘Good’ and ‘Great’ beauty brands

It’s important to call out brands doing poorly, but ultimately, our mission is to support the development of a more sustainable world by championing the brands that are working to do better, and that’s why we’re noting 10 of the highest rated brands here. We’ve split them out into lists of small and large brands, acknowledging that businesses of different sizes have disproportionate power to effect change in their direct operations and the wider supply chain.

As we mentioned above, it’s important to note this doesn’t necessarily mean these top-rated brands are the most sustainable out there—they’re simply the top-performing based on the brands we’ve reviewed so far. And we’ll keep the ratings coming in 2025.

The post The Best and Worst Beauty Brands We Rated in 2024 appeared first on Good On You.

Pass over the stars to rate this post. Your opinion is always welcome.
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

You may also like…

‘Poisoning the Well’ Authors Sharon Udasin and Rachel Frazin on PFAS Contamination and Why It ‘Has Not Received the Attention It Deserves’

‘Poisoning the Well’ Authors Sharon Udasin and Rachel Frazin on PFAS Contamination and Why It ‘Has Not Received the Attention It Deserves’

In the introduction to Sharon Udasin and Rachel Frazin’s new book, Poisoning The Well: How Forever Chemicals Contaminated America, the authors cite an alarming statistic from 2015 that PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) are present in the bodies of an estimated 97% of Americans. How did we ever get to this point? Their book is […]
The post ‘Poisoning the Well’ Authors Sharon Udasin and Rachel Frazin on PFAS Contamination and Why It ‘Has Not Received the Attention It Deserves’ appeared first on EcoWatch.

Turning down the heat: how innovative cooling techniques are tackling the rising costs of AI's energy demands

Turning down the heat: how innovative cooling techniques are tackling the rising costs of AI's energy demands

As enterprises accelerate their AI investments, the energy demand of AI’s power-hungry systems is worrying both the organisations footing the power bills as well as those tasked with supplying reliable electricity. From large language models to digital twins crunching massive datasets to run accurate simulations on complex city systems, AI workloads require a tremendous amount of processing power.

Of course, at the heart of this demand are data centres, which are evolving at breakneck speed to support AI’s growing potential. The International Energy Agency’s AI and Energy Special Report recently predicted that data centre electricity consumption will double by 2030, identifying AI as the most significant driver of this increase.1

The IT leaders examining these staggering predictions are rightly zeroing in on improving the efficiency of these powerful systems. However, the lack of expertise in navigating these intricate systems, combined with the rapidity of innovative developments, is causing heads to spin. Although savvy organisations are baking efficiency considerations into IT projects at the outset, and are looking across the entire AI life cycle for opportunities to minimise impact, many don’t know where to start or are leaving efficiency gains on the table. Most are underutilising the multiple IT efficiency levers that could be pulled to reduce the environmental footprint of their IT, such as using energy-efficient software languages and optimising data use to ensure maximum data efficiency of AI workloads. Among the infrastructure innovations, one of the most exciting advancements we are seeing in data centres is direct liquid cooling (DLC). Because the systems that are running AI workloads are producing more heat, traditional air cooling simply is not enough to keep up with the demands of the superchips in the latest systems.

DLC technology pumps liquid coolants through tubes in direct contact with the processors to dissipate heat and has been proven to keep high-powered AI systems running safely. Switching to DLC has had measurable and transformative impact across multiple environments, showing reductions in cooling power consumption by nearly 90% compared to air cooling in supercomputing systems2.

Thankfully, the benefits of DLC are now also extending beyond supercomputers to reach a broader range of higher-performance servers that support both supercomputing and AI workloads. Shifting DLC from a niche offering to a more mainstream option available across more compute systems is enabling more organisations to tap into the efficiency gains made possible by DLC, which in some cases has been shown to deliver up to 65% in annual power savings3. Combining this kind of cooling innovation with new and improved power-use monitoring tools, able report highly accurate and timely insights, is becoming critical for IT teams wanting to optimise their energy use. All this is a welcome evolution for organisations grappling with rising energy costs and that are carefully considering total cost of ownership (TCO) of their IT systems, and is an area of innovation to watch in the coming years.

In Australia, this kind of technical innovation is especially timely. In March 2024, the Australian Senate established the Select Committee on Adopting Artificial Intelligence to examine the opportunities and impacts of AI technologies4. Among its findings and expert submissions was a clear concern about the energy intensity of AI infrastructure. The committee concluded that the Australian Government legislate for increased regulatory clarity, greater energy efficiency standards, and increased investment in renewable energy solutions. For AI sustainability to succeed, it must be driven by policy to set actionable standards, which then fuel innovative solutions.

Infrastructure solutions like DLC will play a critical role in making this possible — not just in reducing emissions and addressing the energy consumption challenge, but also in supporting the long-term viability of AI development across sectors. We’re already seeing this approach succeed in the real world. For example, the Pawsey Supercomputing Centre in Western Australia has adopted DLC technology to support its demanding research workloads and, in doing so, has significantly reduced energy consumption while maintaining the high performance required for AI and scientific computing. It’s a powerful example of how AI data centres can scale sustainably — and telegraphs an actionable blueprint for others to follow.

Furthermore, industry leaders are shifting how they handle the heat generated by these large computing systems in order to drive further efficiency in AI. Successfully using heat from data centres for other uses will be a vital component to mitigating both overall energy security risks and the efficiency challenges that AI introduces. Data centres are being redesigned to capture by-product heat and use it as a valuable resource, rather than dispose of it as waste heat. Several industries are already benefiting from capturing data centre heat, such as in agriculture for greenhouses, or heating buildings in healthcare and residential facilities. This has been successfully implemented in the UK with the Isambard-AI supercomputer and in Finland with the LUMI supercomputer — setting the bar for AI sustainability best practice globally.

The message is clear: as AI becomes a bigger part of digital transformation projects, so too must the consideration for resource-efficient solutions grow. AI sustainability considerations must be factored into each stage of the AI life cycle, with solutions like DLC playing a part in in a multifaceted IT sustainability blueprint.

By working together with governments to set effective and actionable environmental frameworks and benchmarks, we can encourage the growth and evolution of the AI industry, spurring dynamic innovation in solutions and data centre design for the benefit of all.

1. AI is set to drive surging electricity demand from data centres while offering the potential to transform how the energy sector works – News – IEA
2. https://www.hpe.com/us/en/newsroom/blog-post/2024/08/liquid-cooling-a-cool-approach-for-ai.html
3. HPE introduces next-generation ProLiant servers engineered for advanced security, AI automation and greater performance
4. https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Adopting_Artificial_Intelligence_AI

Image credit: iStock.com/Dragon Claws

The Rise of Chemical Recycling: What Recyclers Should Know

The Rise of Chemical Recycling: What Recyclers Should Know

During WWII, plastic appeared as a “material with 1,000 uses.” Fast forward to today, when global production of plastic has surpassed 359 million tons. While plastic has been helpful in many areas, it’s also created problems within the environment. Microscopic particles of plastic are in the soil, air, and water. They’re in animals, fish, and […]
The post The Rise of Chemical Recycling: What Recyclers Should Know appeared first on RecycleNation.

0 Comments