Search

Photosynthesis inspires net-zero ammonia research

We are an online community created around a smart and easy to access information hub which is focused on providing proven global and local insights about sustainability

26 Aug, 2024

This post was originally published on Sustainability Matters

Scientists from UNSW Sydney have come up with a novel way to sustainably produce ammonia, inspired by the natural process of photosynthesis. Their research has been published in the Journal of Energy and Environmental Science.

Ammonia is a gas that is essential for producing the fertilisers that support global agriculture and food production. However, traditional methods of making ammonia create significant greenhouse gas emissions, since fossil fuels are required for the hydrogen production and energy that power the process.

“Traditional ammonia production requires high temperatures — around 400–500°C — and high pressure, historically necessitating the use of fossil fuels,” said UNSW Scientia Professor Rose Amal, from the School of Chemical Engineering.

To address this problem, teams led by Amal and Professor Xiaojing Hao, from the School of Photovoltaic and Renewable Energy Engineering, developed a way to generate ammonium ions from nitrate-containing wastewater using only a specially designed solar panel that works like an artificial leaf. Using a process known as photoelectrocatalytics (PEC), the researchers placed on the panel a nanostructured thin layer of copper and cobalt hydroxide that acted as a catalyst for the chemical reaction needed to produce ammonium nitrate from the wastewater.

In a real leaf, photosynthesis is the process by which plants use sunlight, water and carbon dioxide to create oxygen and energy in the form of sugar. This new photoelectrocatalytic process mimics photosynthesis, with the solar panel acting like an artificial leaf, using sunlight and nitrate-containing wastewater to create ammonium nitrate.

Artificial leaf system developed at UNSW to create ammonia from wastewater using only the sun. Image credit: Chen Han/UNSW.

The research team, which includes lead author Chen Han and Dr Jian Pan (a DECRA fellow), built a 40 cm2 artificial leaf system on the roof of Tyree Energy Technologies building at UNSW that has been able to produce ammonium ions that can satisfy 1.49 m2 of cropland.

“We think this new technology could be implemented on a relatively small scale in agricultural locations to produce ammonium onsite, which would decentralise the production process and further reduce CO2 emissions that are associated with the transportation process,” Amal said.

“Our findings provide a clean, efficient and cost-effective solution for utilising solar energy and chemical wastes to produce ammonia and other value-added products,” Han added.

“You do not need a high concentration of ammonia in fertiliser, so we believe the amounts of ammonia we are producing using our system make it a viable application in the real world, although we definitely still have some ways to further improve it.”

The researchers hope that the generation of the ammonium from the wastewater will allow the processed water to be used to irrigate crops and further help them to grow.

“It’s important to acknowledge that the wastewater we convert isn’t coming directly from municipal waste or runoff — it still needs to be processed first to filter out the organic matters and particulates,” Amal said.

“But we are hopeful that once we have generated ammonium from the nitrate wastewater, the treated water can then be put into irrigation.”

Amal is keen for further collaboration and involvement with potential industry partners to develop the process into a fully viable commercial system.

“Industry partners would help us scale up this device, and we definitely would like to utilise a full-scale, traditionally sized solar panel for our application,” she said.

“This is important for helping us reach our emissions targets of 2030 and 2040, and ultimately achieving net zero by 2050. We want to produce ammonia in a cleaner and greener way that minimises CO2 emissions.”

Top image caption: The photoelectrode utilising nanostructured thin layer of copper and cobalt hydroxide helps to create ammonia from wastewater using only the sun. Image credit: Chen Han/UNSW.

Pass over the stars to rate this post. Your opinion is always welcome.
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

You may also like…

Taking the electronic pulse of the circular economy

Taking the electronic pulse of the circular economy

In June, I had the privilege of attending the 2025 E-Waste World, Battery Recycling, Metal Recycling, and ITAD & Circular Electronics Conference & Expo events in Frankfurt, Germany.

Speaking in the ITAD & Circular Electronics track on a panel with global Circular Economy leaders from Foxway Group, ERI and HP, we explored the evolving role of IT asset disposition (ITAD) and opportunities in the circular electronics economy.

The event’s focus on advancing circular economy goals and reducing environmental impact delivered a series of insights and learnings. From this assembly of international expertise across 75+ countries, here are some points from the presentations that stood out for me:

1. Environmental impact of the digital economy

Digitalisation has a heavy material footprint in the production phase, and lifecycle thinking needs to guide every product decision. Consider that 81% of the energy a laptop uses in its lifetime is consumed during manufacture (1 tonne in manufacture is equal to 10,000 tonnes of CO2) and laptops are typically refreshed or replaced by companies every 3–4 years.

From 2018 to 2023, the average number of devices and connections per capita in the world increased by 50% (2.4 to 3.6). In North America (8.2 to 13.4) and Western Europe (5.6 to 9.4), this almost doubled. In 1960, only 10 periodic table elements were used to make phones. In 1990, 27 elements were used and now over 60 elements are used to build the smartphones that we have become so reliant on.

A key challenge is that low-carbon and digital technologies largely compete for the same minerals. Material resource extraction could increase 60% between 2020 and 2060, while demand for lithium, cobalt and graphite is expected to rise by 500% until 2050.

High growth in ICT demand and Internet requires more attention to the environmental footprint of the digital economy. Energy consumption of data centres is expected to more than double by 2026. The electronics industry accounts for over 4% of global GHG — and digitalisation-related waste is growing, with skewed impacts on developing countries.

E-waste is rising five times faster than recycling — 1 tonne of e-waste has a carbon footprint of 2 tonnes. Today’s solution? ‘Bury it or burn it.’ In terms of spent emissions, waste and the costs associated with end-of-life liabilities, PCBAs (printed circuit board assembly) cost us enormously — they generally achieve 3–5% recyclability (75% of CO2 in PCBAs is from components).

2. Regulating circularity in electronics

There is good momentum across jurisdictions in right-to-repair, design and labelling regulations; recycling targets; and voluntary frameworks on circularity and eco-design.

The EU is at the forefront. EU legislation is lifting the ICT aftermarket, providing new opportunities for IT asset disposition (ITAD) businesses. To get a sense, the global market for electronics recycling is estimated to grow from $37 billion to $108 billion (2022–2030). The value of refurbished electronics is estimated to increase from $85.9 billion to $262.2 billion (2022–2032). Strikingly, 40% of companies do not have a formal ITAD strategy in place.

Significantly, the EU is rethinking its Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) management targets, aligned with upcoming circularity and WEEE legislation, as part of efforts to foster the circular economy. A more robust and realistic circularity-driven approach to setting collection targets would better reflect various factors including long lifespans of electronic products and market fluctuations.

Australia and New Zealand lag the EU’s comprehensive e-waste mandated frameworks. The lack of a systematic approach results in environmental degradation and missed positioning opportunities for businesses in the circular economy. While Australia’s Senate inquiry into waste reduction and recycling recommended legislating a full circular economy framework — including for imported and local product design, financial incentives and regulatory enforcement, New Zealand remains the only OECD country without a national scheme to manage e-waste.

3. Extending product lifecycles

Along with data security and digital tools, reuse was a key theme in the ITAD & Circular Electronics track of the conference. The sustainable tech company that I lead, Greenbox, recognises that reuse is the simplest circular strategy. Devices that are still functional undergo refurbishment and are reintroduced into the market, reducing new production need and conserving valuable resources.

Conference presenters highlighted how repair over replacement is being legislated as a right in jurisdictions around the world. Resources are saved, costs are lowered, product life is extended, and people and organisations are empowered to support a greener future. It was pointed out that just 43% of countries have recycling policies, 17% of global waste is formally recycled, and less than 1% of global e-waste is formally repaired and reused.

Right to repair is a rising wave in the circular economy, and legislation is one way that civil society is pushing back on programmed obsolescence. Its global momentum continues at different speeds for different product categories — from the recent EU mandates to multiple US state bills (and some laws) through to repair and reuse steps in India, Canada, Australia and New Zealand.

The European Commission’s Joint Research Commission has done a scoping study to identify product groups under the Ecodesign framework that would be most relevant for implementing an EU-wide product reparability scoring system.

Attending this event with the entire electronic waste recycling supply chain — from peers and partners to suppliers and customers — underscored the importance of sharing best practices to address the environmental challenges that increased hardware proliferation and complex related issues are having on the world.

Ross Thompson is Group CEO of sustainability, data management and technology asset lifecycle management market leader Greenbox. With facilities in Brisbane, Sydney, Melbourne, Canberra, Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch, Greenbox Group provides customers all over the world a carbon-neutral supply chain for IT equipment to reduce their carbon footprint by actively managing their environmental, social and governance obligations.

Image credit: iStock.com/Mustafa Ovec

Renewables Helped Prevent Blackouts on New England’s Hottest Day This Summer

Renewables Helped Prevent Blackouts on New England’s Hottest Day This Summer

Renewable energy sources, such as solar power and battery storage, have helped keep power on in New England, even during peak demand on the hottest day of summer. According to a recent report from the nonprofit Acadia Center, more than 5 gigawatts of behind-the-meter solar provided additional support during peak demand times, despite the temperature […]
The post Renewables Helped Prevent Blackouts on New England’s Hottest Day This Summer appeared first on EcoWatch.

0 Comments