Search

PFAS ‘Forever Chemicals’ Used on Farms Could Significantly Raise Health Risks, EPA Draft Guidelines Warn

We are an online community created around a smart and easy to access information hub which is focused on providing proven global and local insights about sustainability

15 Jan, 2025

This post was originally published on Eco Watch

Toxic chemicals from sewage sludge used as fertilizer pose health risks to those who regularly consume products from farms that use it, in some instances raising cancer risk by “several orders of magnitude” over what is considered acceptable by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), federal officials said on Tuesday.

EPA’s draft risk assessment, Draft Sewage Sludge Risk Assessment for Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluorooctane Sulfonic Acid (PFOS), is a scientific evaluation of potential health risks to humans associated with toxic per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) “forever chemicals” in biosolids, or “sewage sludge,” a press release from EPA said.

“EPA under President Biden’s leadership has taken unprecedented actions to advance research and science on PFAS and to protect people from these dangerous forever chemicals,” said Jane Nishida, EPA’s acting administrator, in the press release. “This draft assessment provides important information to help inform future actions by federal and state agencies as well as steps that wastewater systems, farmers and other stakeholders can take to protect people from PFAS exposure, while ensuring American industry keeps feeding and fueling our nation.”

The findings show that exposure to PFOA or PFOS — two types of forever chemicals — during sewage sludge use and disposal methods may pose human health risks. The three methods are: surface disposal in landfills, land application of biosolids and incineration.

Once the assessment is finalized, it will assist EPA and partners in understanding the public health impacts posed by forever chemicals in biosolids, as well as inform potential future actions that could help reduce exposure risk.

Wastewater gets conveyed to a treatment plant from businesses, households and industrial dischargers. The treatment processes produce a semi-solid product that is rich in nutrients called “biosolids” or “sewage sludge.”

An urban wastewater treatment plant. Bilanol / iStock / Getty Images Plus

“EPA typically uses the term ‘biosolids’ to mean sewage sludge that has been treated to meet regulatory standards and is thereby suitable to be land applied as a soil conditioner or fertilizer. In turn, biosolids can be beneficially reused as land applied fertilizer on agricultural fields or on nonagricultural lands to promote plant health and productivity,” EPA explained.

EPA’s draft risk assessment focused on a narrow and specific population that the agency considered most likely to have exposure to PFOS or PFOA from biosolids being applied to land or through the consumption of products produced on the land where biosolids were applied as fertilizer.

“The preliminary findings of the draft risk assessment indicate that there can be human health risks exceeding EPA’s acceptable thresholds, sometimes by several orders of magnitude, for some scenarios where the farmer applied biosolids containing 1 part per billion (ppb) of PFOA or PFOS (which is near the current detection limit for these PFAS in biosolids),” the press release said.

The risk assessment used scientific modeling of hypothetical health risks to humans who live on or near sites that have been impacted by PFOS or PFOA or for those who mostly rely on products from the sites, such as animal products, food crops or drinking water.

“EPA risk assessments follow a scientific process to characterize the nature and magnitude of health risks to children, adults, and the environment from pollutants based on modeled exposure scenarios. An environmental risk assessment considers three primary factors: 1) presence (i.e., how much of a pollutant is present in the environment); 2) exposure (i.e., how much contact a human or wildlife has with the pollutant); and 3) the toxicity of the pollutant (i.e., the health effects the pollutant causes in humans or wildlife),” EPA said.

The modeled scenarios included farms that used one application of 10 dry-metric-tons per hectare of the biosolids for 40 consecutive years.

The modeling also found human health risks above the EPA acceptable standards in scenarios where 1 part per billion of PFOS or PFOA was put in a clay-lined or unlined surface disposal unit.

Once the draft risk assessment is finalized, EPA will use it to “help inform future risk management actions for PFOA and PFOS in sewage sludge. For the incineration scenario, risk is not quantified due to significant data gaps,” the press release said.

The analysis did not suggest that the country’s general food supply was contaminated by biosolids containing PFOS or PFOA, but the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Food and Drug Administration are conducting broad PFAS monitoring in the food supply and have taken actions to address products that have been impacted from imported and domestic sources.

According to the “best available data,” biosolids make up less than a percent of fertilized acreage of the nation’s productive agricultural lands annually. There are specific “hot spots” recognized by EPA, and certain farming operations could have higher PFOS or PFOA levels if they used contaminated sludge.

EPA said “further collaboration with impacted operations and other federal agencies will be important to fully understand risks and support impacted farmers.”

The analysis found that PFOS and PFOA risks of exposure from biosolids increased proportionally with how much of the chemicals were present.

“This means that if you lower the concentration of PFOA or PFOS in biosolids or the amount of biosolids applied to agricultural land, you lower the risk. The actual risks from exposure to PFOA or PFOS will vary at farms that land-apply biosolids or at biosolids disposal sites based on the amount of PFOA or PFOS applied, as well as geography, climate, soil conditions, the types of crops grown and their nutrient needs and other factors.,” EPA said.

The draft risk assessment’s findings highlight the importance of proactive state and federal policies to remove and control PFAS at their source.

“Moving forward, EPA is working to set technology-based limits on discharges from several industrial categories — including PFAS manufacturers, electro- and chrome-platers and landfills — under the agency’s Effluent Limitations Guidelines program,” the press release said. “Several states have begun monitoring for PFAS in sewage sludge and published reports and data that are publicly available.”

The post PFAS ‘Forever Chemicals’ Used on Farms Could Significantly Raise Health Risks, EPA Draft Guidelines Warn appeared first on EcoWatch.

Pass over the stars to rate this post. Your opinion is always welcome.
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

You may also like…

Land water loss causes sea level rise in 21st century

Land water loss causes sea level rise in 21st century

An international team of scientists, led jointly by The University of Melbourne and Seoul National University, has found global water storage on land has plummeted since the start of the 21st century, overtaking glacier melt as the leading cause of sea level rise and measurably shifting the Earth’s pole of rotation.

Published in Science, the research combined global soil moisture data estimated by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecast (ECMWF) Reanalysis v5 (ERA5), global mean sea level measurements and observations of Earth’s pole movement in order to estimate changes in terrestrial (land) water storage (TWS) from 1979 to 2016.

“The study raises critical questions about the main drivers of declining water storage on land and whether global lands will continue to become drier,” University of Melbourne author Professor Dongryeol Ryu said.

“Water constantly cycles between land and oceans, but the current rate of water loss from land is outpacing its replenishment. This is potentially irreversible because it’s unlikely this trend will reverse if global temperatures and evaporative demand continue to rise at their current rates. Without substantial changes in climate patterns, the imbalance in the water cycle is likely to persist, leading to a net loss of water from land to oceans over time.”

Between 2000 and 2002, soil moisture decreased by around 1614 gigatonnes (1 Gt equals 1 km3 of water) — nearly double Greenland’s ice loss of about 900 Gt in 2002–2006. From 2003 to 2016, soil moisture depletion continued, with an additional 1009 Gt lost.

Soil moisture had not recovered as of 2021, with little likelihood of recovery under present climate conditions. The authors say this decline is corroborated by independent observations of global mean sea level rise (~4.4 mm) and Earth’s polar shift (~45 cm in 2003–2012).

Water loss was most pronounced across East and Central Asia, Central Africa, and North and South America. In Australia, the growing depletion has impacted parts of Western Australia and south-eastern Australia, including western Victoria, although the Northern Territory and Queensland saw a small replenishment of soil moisture.

Image credit: iStock.com/ZU_09

In Vivid Reliquaries, Stan Squirewell Layers Anonymous Portraits and Patterned Textiles

In Vivid Reliquaries, Stan Squirewell Layers Anonymous Portraits and Patterned Textiles

Through intimate, mixed-media collages, Stan Squirewell excavates the stories of those who might otherwise be lost in anonymity.
Do stories and artists like this matter to you? Become a Colossal Member today and support independent arts publishing for as little as $7 per month. The article In Vivid Reliquaries, Stan Squirewell Layers Anonymous Portraits and Patterned Textiles appeared first on Colossal.

0 Comments