Search

Material Guide: How Ethical Is Cashmere and Is It Sustainable?

We are an online community created around a smart and easy to access information hub which is focused on providing proven global and local insights about sustainability

27 Oct, 2024

This post was originally published on Good on You

Cashmere has long been considered an ultra soft, luxurious, and expensive material. And although it’s increasingly common and affordable, more accessible prices don’t mean improved values. So how sustainable is cashmere, exactly? Here’s why it’s best avoided. 

Is cashmere the same as wool?

Cashmere fibre (sometimes called cashmere wool) is another name for the hair of a specific breed of goat originating in Kashmir, India, where cashmere production is said to have begun around the 13th century. While sheep and alpacas are shorn for their wool, goats are most often combed for cashmere production, and since the fibre comes from the goat’s inner coat, only a small amount can be collected from each animal. According to Textile Exchange, in 2023, China produced 69% of the world’s cashmere fibre.

Unlike the vast majority of sheep in wool production who are confined to one fenced area for their productive lives, most cashmere goats live nomadically with herders. And while advertisements may lead us to believe that goats grazing grasslands live happy lives and contribute positively to the ecosystem they are bred into, unfortunately, this is not necessarily the case. Let’s take a look at the ethics of cashmere.

Cashmere: how a status symbol got so cheap

People used to pay a lot more for cashmere than they do today. This isn’t unique to cashmere, as the fast fashion industry continues to spew out all kinds of garments for lower market prices while the true cost is footed by the people, animals, and environments harmed in their making.

As more people (particularly those in the Global North) demanded more cashmere knitwear, an industry that requires between four and six goats to be combed for a single sweater had to ramp up its pace. This led to far lower welfare standards for goats and reduced payments to herders and industry workers, causing socio-economic struggles.

A single cashmere sweater requires the hair of four to six goats.

But this isn’t the only issue with cashmere—its impact on animals, the land they graze on, and the people throughout the supply chain extends far further.

Impact on animals

Like many animal-derived materials, the primary ethical question around cashmere centres on welfare—in this case, the wellbeing of goats. Before we get into the problems goats face in the cashmere industry, it’s worth knowing more about the animals themselves.

Goats are clever, known to be inquisitive, at times a bit cheeky, and highly expressive. They communicate with each other, recognising both positive and negative emotions just through the sound of a call from another goat. Researchers have compared the way goats engage with humans to our relationships with dogs.

So how are these sentient animals—capable of feeling pleasure just as much as pain—treated in the cashmere industry?

Combing: not as ‘cruelty-free’ as it sounds

Many companies selling cashmere sweaters, scarves, and beanies will explain on their websites that cashmere goats aren’t shorn like sheep but are gently combed. This can sound as though the process is comfortable for the animals. But that’s not the case.

While in Iran, Afghanistan, New Zealand, and Australia, cashmere goats are shorn—resulting in the same welfare problems found in wool supply chains—the majority of goats are combed with sharp-toothed metal combs, which can scratch deeply into their skin, sometimes causing bruises and injury.

The RSPCA, considered a conservative animal welfare organisation, does not support the use of these metal combs. Across Asia and most Middle Eastern countries where cashmere production is most common, here’s how cashmere collection usually goes down:

  • Goats are tied up, all four of their legs wrapped together, so they are immobilised. This immobilisation is, as you would imagine, frightening and stressful.
  • Goats are roughly combed for as long as an hour, on average. Investigations have shown goats screaming out in pain and distress during this long and gruelling process.
  • While it’s sometimes claimed that goats are only combed when they’re naturally moulting (shedding their thick winter coats), this moulting process varies based on unique differences between individuals. This means some goats in a herd may not be moulting come combing time.

A slaughter industry

Not only do cashmere goats suffer through the distressing combing process—as well as painful mutilations like castration (for males) without pain relief—they are killed once their financial value dwindles.

Goats would naturally live to be about twelve years old, though some have lived far older. Goats treated as commodities in the cashmere industry don’t get to live out their full lifespan, because once their hair thins and brittles with age (just like our own), they are slaughtered.

In countries like Australia, goats are killed some years before reaching even half their natural lifespan. What’s more, if goats are born with a coat of hair that isn’t considered the “right” colour or of a high enough quality, they’ll be killed far sooner.

Across the leading cashmere-producing regions China and Mongolia, there are practically no laws protecting goats from cruelty. Here, investigations have shown goats to be killed while fully conscious.

Impact on humans and their land

While research shows that jobs involving slaughtering animals can lead to severe negative mental health outcomes, cashmere herders face other problems, too.

Reporting has consistently shown that rising demand for cashmere is tied to a cashmere-debt cycle and poorer social outcomes for those working in the industry. It has also been linked to rising climatic temperatures, land degradation, and even some native species endangerment.

This reality can be devastating for many nomadic herders who feel they have no choice but to contribute to this destruction for our cashmere demand. But if consumers shifted away from purchasing new cashmere due to its detrimental impacts, we would need to factor the wellbeing of herders into that shift and find new, more just and sustainable ways to economically support them going forward.

Impact on the planet

Here’s the good bit: cashmere is biodegradable in its natural state (though if it’s been treated with chemicals or dyes, which it usually is, then it’s unlikely to break down safely) and can be considered a renewable resource.

However, the agricultural side of cashmere does have planetary impacts: Around 70% of Mongolia’s once biodiverse grasslands have been degraded due to cashmere goat grazing, as well as the impact of the climate crisis. And the breeding of animals who burp methane is responsible for a significant portion of greenhouse gas emissions—according to the UN, livestock accounts for 32% of human-caused methane emissions.

What’s more, goats are notoriously unfussy eaters, ripping all sorts of plants up from the roots, contributing to biodiversity loss. The sharp hooves of these goats also cut into and can degrade the earth underneath them.

While this all sounds grim, researcher Bulgamaa Densambuu has some good news about these grasslands, specifically in Monogolia: “90% of this total degraded rangeland can be recovered naturally within ten years if we can change existing management. But if we can’t change today, it will be too late after five to ten years.”

Is there more ethical and sustainable cashmere?

Given the significant harm that cashmere production causes goats, herders, and the environment they share, conscious consumers’ best bet is to avoid new cashmere.

If you’re really keen on snuggling into the warm fibre, opting for the many well made vintage or second-hand garments knitted from the material is the ideal option.

Recycled cashmere is available on the market and is a more sustainable option, though keep in mind that partly recycled fibres can be blended with new cashmere during manufacturing—check the garment label or brand website to see if it sheds light on this before buying something.

As always, buying pre-loved and caring for the clothes you already have is the most ethical and sustainable way to get dressed. But if you’re looking for new knitwear and want to avoid cashmere (as well as wool), here are some more ethical and sustainable materials you might want to keep an eye out for:

  • Organic cotton, which makes for great knitwear
  • Hemp
  • Tencel, which has similar thermo-regulating properties
  • Organic linen

Looking for more material guides? Explore our library to find out how ethical your favourite fabrics are.

The post Material Guide: How Ethical Is Cashmere and Is It Sustainable? appeared first on Good On You.

Pass over the stars to rate this post. Your opinion is always welcome.
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

You may also like…

Switzerland to Add More Solar Power to Rooftops and Highway Noise Barriers

Switzerland to Add More Solar Power to Rooftops and Highway Noise Barriers

In Switzerland, highway noise barriers surrounding the Oberland Autobahn near Wangen-Brüttisellen will soon provide solar power. Last year, Switzerland’s Federal Roads Office made the surfaces of highway noise barriers free and set out to cover 350 of them in solar panels. Swiss officials estimated that the arrays could generate 100 gigawatt hours of clean energy […]
The post Switzerland to Add More Solar Power to Rooftops and Highway Noise Barriers appeared first on EcoWatch.

From coal to clean: accelerating Asia's renewable energy transition

From coal to clean: accelerating Asia's renewable energy transition

With world leaders, climate and environmental scientists and business leaders having gathered in Baku for COP29 — the 29th Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) — we’ve been advocating that this transformation poses significant challenges while simultaneously providing opportunities for growth, resilience and innovation.

The role of coal and the need for change

Coal remains the largest contributor to climate change, generating 35% of global electricity as of 2023. The International Energy Agency’s (IEA) net-zero scenario calls for OECD countries to reduce coal’s share in power generation to 14% by 2030, with a complete global phase-out of unabated coal by 2040.

This underscores the fact that achieving global climate goals hinges on a viable energy transition strategy, particularly in Asia, where demand continues to surge.

The need for decarbonisation is stark: Asia’s carbon emissions now account for over half of the global total. The young age of Asia’s coal fleet — about 13 years on average — complicates the shift to renewables, with significant investments still tied up in coal plants. According to the World Economic Forum, policies that streamline and incentivise plant closures or conversions can accelerate the pace of transition.

Economic and environmental challenge

Transitioning to renewables in Asia requires not only technological shifts but also robust financial mechanisms.

We need financing models that incorporate public and private capital, with mechanisms like loans and grants making clean energy more accessible and competitive.

Countries like Vietnam face hurdles such as rigid power purchase agreements that protect coal plants from competition. Overcoming these barriers demands innovative financing, potentially reducing the cost of capital to make renewable projects more viable and less risky.

The move from coal to renewables also requires securing grid stability and resilience. The diversity of resources across Asia — from hydropower in Southeast Asia to solar in China — necessitates tailored strategies for integrating these resources into a cohesive and stable energy grid. GHD is actively involved in helping clients to navigate these complexities by advising on technical planning, decommissioning and the use of renewables like solar and wind.

Action steps to help Asia transform from coal to clean:

Develop robust financing models: Facilitate access to capital with a mix of loans, grants and public–private partnerships to make renewable energy more competitive and scalable.

Strengthen policy frameworks: Governments should adopt supportive policies to encourage investment, ease regulatory restrictions and provide incentives for renewable energy projects.

Invest in grid resilience and smart technology: Modernising grid infrastructure, including smart grids, is essential for integrating renewables and managing intermittent supply efficiently.

Encourage regional knowledge-sharing and collaboration: Cross-border partnerships can accelerate technology transfer, innovation and the development of best practices for transitioning from coal.

Support local workforces and communities: Implement training programs, workforce transition initiatives and local engagement strategies to ensure a fair and equitable transition for coal-dependent communities.
 

Based on this, there are three critical pillars for a successful transition: stable technical solutions, sustainable stakeholder engagement and a strong business case. Every project requires bespoke planning that integrates stakeholder interests, addresses environmental impacts and leverages technical expertise to ensure grid reliability.

A well-defined transition strategy that supports all stakeholders and secures financial backing is essential for a viable energy future.

Creating such a strategy involves evaluating the potential of each project and exploring repurposing opportunities, from battery storage to hydrogen production.

Looking forward: policy, financing and social impact

A successful transition will rely on supportive policies that facilitate investment and foster technological advancements. We need to understand the importance of a ‘just transition’ that balances environmental goals with economic equity, especially in coal-reliant communities.

Communities cannot be sidelined; local stakeholders need to benefit from new economic opportunities in renewables. At COP29 in Baku, GHD has been advocating for a holistic approach, including policy alignment, financial innovation and active community engagement.

The shift from coal to clean energy isn’t merely a goal — it’s an urgent necessity. Through collaboration, innovation and commitment to sustainable development, we can achieve a cleaner, greener future for Asia and beyond.

*Richard Fechner is GHD’s Enterprise Business Advisory Leader, leading the global business in providing strategy, commercial, economic, business case, logistics, policy, regulatory, asset management and transaction services. With over 30 years of experience, Richard has held senior roles in both the private and public sectors, contributing significantly to infrastructure development, investment and delivery across various sectors including ports, agriculture, energy, government and defence. He has advised on approximately AU$150 billion in infrastructure transactions and is a highly skilled infrastructure and business professional with expertise in strategic planning, business management and project engineering.

**Dr Tej Gidda is a distinguished expert in clean energy transitions and currently serves as the Global Leader for Future Energy at GHD. With over 20 years of industry experience, Dr Gidda holds a PhD in Environmental Engineering and is a registered Professional Engineer in Ontario. His work focuses on integrating clean energy technologies into existing systems and developing innovative strategies to overcome challenges related to reliability and affordability. Dr Gidda’s expertise spans hydrogen, renewable natural gas, traditional renewables, energy from waste, energy security and planning. He is also an adjunct professor at the University of Waterloo.

Top image caption: Pagudpud Wind Farm, Ilocos Norte, Philippines. Image courtesy of GHD.

0 Comments