Search

Interview with Ricardo Mastroti: The Brazilian Business Council for Sustainable Development (CEBDS) Executive Director

We are an online community created around a smart and easy to access information hub which is focused on providing proven global and local insights about sustainability

19 Jun, 2024

This post was originally published on WBCSD

Leia em português – Entrevista com Ricardo Mastroti: Diretor Executivo do Conselho Empresarial Brasileiro para o Desenvolvimento Sustentável (CEBDS)

In this interview, Ricardo Mastroti, Executive Director of The Brazilian Business Council for Sustainable Development (CEBDS), discusses how government policies can effectively support the integration of nature-based solutions into broader climate strategies in key Brazilian biomes such as the Amazon and Cerrado. With over 20 years of experience leading ESG divisions within national and multinational companies, Ricardo also explains why policy and finance levers are key to scale up initiatives such as the Farmer First Clusters to further Brazil’s journey to a nature-positive economy. 

What is CEBDS’ perspective on the trajectory toward COP30, particularly regarding the organization’s efforts to position Brazil as a leader in transitioning to a green economy? 

CEBDS’ vision is for Brazil to lead the transition toward a just, carbon-neutral, equitable, and nature-positive global economy. Brazil recently unveiled its Federal Government’s Ecological Transformation Plan, to which CEBDS has actively contributed to and which signals Brazil’s intentions to shape a green economy. To deliver the plan, attract external capital and boost Brazil’s transition, there is a need to ensure an improved business environment which can support economic stability, develop effective incentive structures and accompany associated public policies. 

Since 2016, CEBDS has been promoting the need to establish a regulatory framework for Brazil’s carbon market, and has since been providing technical assistance to the Federal Government to develop its National Bioeconomy Strategy.  

By COP30, the organization aims to support corporates and the Brazilian government to pursue their respective climate commitments, demonstrating that Brazil’s Paris Agreement objective to achieve climate neutrality by 2050 is possible. 

How can government policies effectively support the integration of nature-based solutions into broader climate strategies, especially in key Brazilian biomes like the Amazon and the Cerrado? 

Brazil’s six biomes represent 15-20% of the planet’s known biodiversity. The country is therefore well positioned to assume a leading role in offering global nature-based solutions (NbS) and natural climate solutions (NCS). Public policies that successfully tackle deforestation and value environmental assets are crucial to halting and reversing the destruction of carbon- and biodiversity abundant biomes like the Amazon and Cerrado.  

Launched at the end of 2023, Brazil’s Ecological Transformation Plan provides the guidance and conditions to mitigate the risks of macroeconomic instability which could jeopardize the country’s environmental and social transition. It does so by creating the incentive structures for a carbon-neutral economy to emerge and by strengthening the supply chains capable of economically valuing the wealth of Brazilian ecosystems and the knowledge of its traditional people. Thanks to CEBDS’ engagement, the business sector contributed to the Plan with a set of recommendations

On food systems transformation, CEBDS has also been working with the federal government to promote the implementation of regenerative agriculture in Brazil. On another project, we recently initiated the development of a Brazilian business sector position paper on its contribution to elaborating and implementing a nationally viable traceability system for the livestock sector.  

More broadly, CEBDS advocates for public policies and economic instruments which have the capacity to shift economic behavior toward sustainable practices. The organization also actively supports the regulation of the national carbon market as well as the creation of a Brazilian green taxonomy and the regulation of Payments for Environmental Services (PES). 

What financial instruments or mechanisms attract investment in landscape initiatives that contribute both to carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation? 

Instruments like PES, bioinputs and regenerative agriculture, through practices such as no soil disturbance, permanent ground cover, and crop rotation, are examples of solutions that contribute to soil conservation and reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. PES allows producers to turn a profit from conserving native vegetation, while being an effective mechanism to stimulate the maintenance, recovery, and/or ecosystems services restoration throughout the national territory. Moreover, Brazil’s National Bioinput Program aims to reduce dependence on imported inputs, effectively and sustainably utilize Brazil’s biodiversity potential, and indirectly reduce GHG emissions.  

Regenerative agriculture is being implemented worldwide, and according to the Future of Nature and Business report from the World Economic Forum (WEF), this agricultural model is one of the most important strategies in transitioning to more sustainable, productive and inclusive production models, noting its particular relevance when coupled with the assurance of the absence of land clearing. If adopted on a large scale by 2030, regenerative agriculture can generate US$1.4 trillion in business annually and create 62 million new jobs worldwide. Based on Brazil’s Ecological Transformation Plan priorities, the WEF estimates that regenerative agriculture in the Cerrado has the potential to add up to U$72 billion annually to the country’s GDP. CEBDS has several member companies that employ or encourage their suppliers to transition to regenerative practices, with actions such as replacing degraded pastures with agricultural crops, as captured in the report “Regenerative Agriculture in Brazil: challenges and opportunities,” launched at COP28. 

How does CEBDS view the role of the Soft Commodities Forum (SCF) in driving sustainability agendas, and what strategies does CEBDS employ to ensure effective collaboration and impactful results within such diverse stakeholder networks? 

The SCF contributes to the conservation of priority landscapes and the transition to more sustainable soy production, in landscapes where deforestation pressure has increased in recent years. We believe that partnering with local actors that are familiar with the challenges and opportunities of the region, such as CEBDS, could amplify the initiative’s results.  

The SCF and CEBDS have shared goals to support the private sector in achieving traceability of sourcing, conserving native ecosystems and engaging corporates in the implementation of regenerative agriculture. This alignment in agendas is promising for the sustainable transition of food systems in Brazil. 

The agribusiness sector has been adopting sustainable practices and technologies for food production for years. Practices such as no-tillage, bioinputs, livestock waste managementwater circularity, restoration of degraded areas and traceability have been adopted, especially in the last decade, largely in response to climate change and calls for improvements in food production and quality. Brazil’s recently launched 2023/2024 Harvest Plan makes it clear that it will reward rural producers who adopt sustainable practices and brings several programs aimed at financing sustainable practices, mainly related to GHG emissions reductions. 

How can landscape initiatives, such as the Farmer First Clusters, support Brazil’s path to net zero carbon by 2050? 

We welcome initiatives like the Farmer First Clusters, which have a landscape approach and bring financial incentives, technical assistance and training to farmers. These should be expanded to and replicated in other biomes, as decarbonization requires actions from various sectors and across value chains. Emissions produced across the value chain represent a significant amount of a company’s environmental footprint and remain difficult to measure, collect, manage and report on.  

The involvement of CEBDS in projects and initiatives like the Farmer First Clusters initiative can enhance their success and impact  through greater engagement of companies and other key stakeholders. CEBDS, which represents the Brazilian business sector, possesses expertise in agricultural landscape management and conservation. It leads initiatives to restore degraded pastures, boost short-term productivity, and prevent further environmental damage. These efforts include transitioning to a low-carbon agricultural system, promoting sustainable practices among rural producers, and encouraging private investment in regenerative agriculture.  

Could you elaborate on CEBDS’ approach to promoting multi-sector collaboration in landscape initiatives, particularly in engaging local communities, indigenous groups and other relevant stakeholders? 

CEBDS promotes multi-sector collaboration in landscape initiatives by engaging local communities, indigenous groups, and various stakeholders. For example, thus far, the organization has focused on human rights and consultation, free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) of indigenous communities, advocating for their inclusion in corporate governance structures for the Amazon’s preservation.  

Through forums like the Global Business Initiative on Human Rights, we also facilitate discussions on climate change and human rights, involving companies, local organizations and indigenous representatives.  

“Collaborative efforts and innovative financial instruments are essential for driving landscape initiatives that contribute to carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation”. With CEBDS and the SCF leading multistakeholder collaborative initiatives, Brazil is well positioned to navigate a path toward a green economy, one that prioritizes environmental integrity and social equity across its key biomes. 
 
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the interviewee. 

The post Interview with Ricardo Mastroti: The Brazilian Business Council for Sustainable Development (CEBDS) Executive Director first appeared on WBCSD.

Pass over the stars to rate this post. Your opinion is always welcome.
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

You may also like…

Energy Efficiency as an Imperative Climate Strategy

Energy Efficiency as an Imperative Climate Strategy

With mandatory climate statement disclosure rolling out in Australia, businesses need to start reporting on their emissions and sustainability plans for the future. As companies begin assessing the relevant risks and opportunities related to various climate scenarios, energy efficiency presents itself as an immediate climate-strategy with long-term benefits.

Commencing 1 January 2025, businesses that meet two of the three conditions — more than 500 employees, gross assets above $1 billion or $500 million or more in consolidated gross revenue — are required to lodge a climate statement, which discloses their climate-related plans, financial risks and obligations. As part of the gradual roll-out, by 1 July 2027, businesses that meet two of these conditions — more than 100 employees, gross assets above $25 million or exceeding $50 million in consolidated gross revenue — will also be required to report.

This climate statement will need to include the company’s sustainability governance, climate risks and opportunities, including those physical and transition related. They will also need to disclose their Scope 1 and 2 emissions, strategy to decarbonise, and conduct scenario analysis on the short, medium and long term impacts on the business. By the second year of reporting, businesses will also be expected to report on Scope 3 emissions.

Scenario analysis will be based on various assumptions of the state of the climate, one of which includes a possible future where global temperature has increased 2.5°C or more. They will be required to share their climate strategy and steps they are taking long-term in preparation for this scenario.

Common themes within climate strategies will include switching to renewable energy sources, electrifying fleet vehicles, purchasing carbon credits, and carbon capture and storage. Many of these methods look at reducing emissions through the energy source, or targeting the carbon aspect directly; however, climate strategies can also include reducing the amount of energy used. By investing in more energy efficient equipment, sites can maintain production whilst using less energy and producing less emissions.

When increasing energy efficiency and reducing energy consumption first, businesses will see short-term impacts; however, in the long term, they are also improving their foundation for an energy transition. Assuming no other changes, higher energy efficiency can lead to decreased energy demand, allowing for reduced system requirements when specifying and planning for self-generation or energy costs.

To understand what opportunities are available for upgrading to more energy efficient equipment, businesses can start with an energy audit to understand how energy is being consumed across site. Energy audits, like the ABB Energy Appraisal, can provide a roadmap for where and how equipment can be upgraded for the best energy saving potential. An energy audit identifies areas that can be immediately improved with existing equipment on the market, so there is no need to wait for the commercialization or development of more sustainable technology. Going beyond just changing all lights to LEDs, efficiency recommendations may include areas where variable speed drives can be added to control motor speed or upgrading from an IE3 motor to an IE5 ultra-premium efficiency or IE6 hyper-premium efficiency motor to reduce energy losses by 40% or more. This area can often be overlooked on sites as the Minimum Energy Performance Standard (MEPS) in Australia for motors is just IE2.

Mostly used in pumps, compressors, conveyors and fans, motors may seem like a minor part of a site; however, with 45% of the world’s electricity converted into motion by industrial electric motors, there are many opportunities for energy savings. In fact, a recent survey commissioned by ABB IEC Low voltage motors, showed that 92% of surveyed businesses in Australia recognize the important role of electric motors in achieving sustainability targets. In this same survey, participants ranked a reduction in operating cost as a more important driver for investing in energy efficiency than lowering their organization’s emissions. This is because upgrading to newer, more efficient equipment provides benefits beyond just emission reduction. For example, ABB’s Synchronous Reluctance (SynRM) Motors, available in IE5 ultra-premium efficiency or IE6 hyper-premium efficiency, use no rare earth metals or magnets. Running quieter and with bearing temperatures reduced by up to 15°C and winding temperatures by up to 30°, SynRM motors have longer maintenance periods, superior reliability, and contribute to a better operational environment.

Looking ahead, upgrading to an IE5 SynRM motor also provides more visibility into Scope 3 emissions, as SynRM motors meet ABB’s circularity criteria and transparency on environmental impact is provided through Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs).

By requiring companies to disclose their climate information, these new legal requirements are opening the door and facilitating more internal discussions on environmental impact and emission reduction. Whilst mandatory climate reporting is only required of large business entities this year, the progressive roll-out and Scope 3 emission reporting requirements mean that businesses of all sizes in Australia will be impacted by these new requirements. As businesses become more conscious of how sustainability should be integrated into their operations and finances, there is no better time to start investing in energy efficient solutions.

For more information, click here.

Image credit: iStock.com/denizunlusu

0 Comments