Search

Fix Our Forests Act: Strengthening Wildfire Resilience Through Fireshed Management

We are an online community created around a smart and easy to access information hub which is focused on providing proven global and local insights about sustainability

19 Feb, 2025

This post was originally published on Healthy Forest

As wildfires grow increasingly destructive across the nation, the Fix Our Forests Act (FOFA) takes action to mitigate fire risks in the most vulnerable areas called “firesheds.” This bipartisan legislation defines firesheds and introduces a comprehensive strategy to enhance forest management, streamline wildfire prevention efforts, and protect critical forestry projects from obstructive lawsuits.

What Are Firesheds?

Under FOFA, firesheds are large, landscape-scale areas where wildfire risks are high due to fuel loads, climate conditions, and proximity to communities. The bill specifically identifies and prioritizes the top 20% of firesheds at greatest risk as Fireshed Management Areas, ensuring federal, state, and local efforts focus on reducing wildfire exposure where it matters most.

These areas are determined using data from the Fireshed Registry and the Wildfire Crisis Strategy, considering factors such as wildfire exposure to communities, including risks to homes and critical infrastructure; threats to municipal watersheds that supply drinking water; and the likelihood of forest conversion due to severe wildfires.

How the Fix Our Forests Act Increases Forest Management & Wildfire Risk Reduction

FOFA prioritizes proactive land management within firesheds to reduce fuel loads and lower wildfire risks. Key provisions of the bill include:

  • Expanded hazardous fuels management – Allows for mechanical thinning, prescribed burns, timber harvesting, and strategic fuel break construction in Fireshed Management Areas.
  • Streamlined environmental reviews – Enables faster approval of urgent wildfire prevention projects by increasing acreage allowances under existing Categorical Exclusions (CEs).
  • Interagency Coordination through the Fireshed Center – A new federal office will integrate data, enhance fire behavior prediction models, and unify decision-making across multiple agencies, ensuring a more effective response to wildfire threats.
  • Shared Stewardship Agreements – FOFA promotes cross-boundary collaboration between federal, state, and tribal governments, ensuring that land managers work together on fireshed management projects.

By emphasizing science-driven wildfire risk reduction, FOFA ensures that efforts are focused on at-risk communities and critical infrastructure while preserving forest health.

Preventing Frivolous Lawsuits Against Essential Forestry Work

One of the biggest obstacles to effective wildfire mitigation has been legal challenges that delay or block forest management projects. FOFA protects fireshed management efforts from frivolous lawsuits by:

  • Limiting injunctions – Courts can only halt a fireshed project if it poses a “proximate and substantial environmental harm” with no alternative remedy available.
  • Restricting legal claims – Plaintiffs can no longer derail projects over minor procedural concerns. Instead, if a court finds an issue, it may remand the project back to agencies with a 180-day deadline for correction, allowing essential forestry work to continue in the meantime.
  • Preventing endless delays – The bill prohibits courts from setting aside or vacating fireshed management projects unless they meet strict environmental harm criteria.

These legal safeguards ensure that critical wildfire prevention work moves forward swiftly, protecting lives, property, and ecosystems from catastrophic wildfires.

The House of Representatives passed the Fix Our Forests Act in January with bipartisan support, but the Senate has yet to act. We need your voice to urge the Senate to pass this bill without delay and send it to the President’s desk! Please take two minutes to send a message from our web site.

Pass over the stars to rate this post. Your opinion is always welcome.
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

Source: Healthy Forest

You may also like…

City dwellers at higher risk of heatwave death

City dwellers at higher risk of heatwave death

Mortality rates during heatwaves have been put in the spotlight with research from the University of Queensland (UQ) showing a 20% increase in heatwave-related deaths due to human-induced climate change.

Another UQ study has also revealed people living in cities are at a higher risk of dying from heatwaves than those in regional areas.

The two studies examined the mortality burden of heatwaves in Australia, and Associate Professor Nicholas Osborne from the School of Public Health hopes this research will assist communities and health authorities to prepare for extreme temperature events.

“Our results suggest heatwaves with associated periods of higher mortality will occur more often than they did in the past,” Osborne said.

“These higher mortality rates associated with extreme temperature heatwaves are projected to continue and we hope our research will help communities be better prepared for heatwaves.”

Heatwave risk for those living in cities

In one study, UQ researchers analysed two decades’ worth of temperature and mortality data to determine which areas in Australia are more vulnerable to heatwaves, through a Heatwave Vulnerability Index.

PhD candidate Patrick Amoatey from the School of Public Health said the study — the largest of its kind conducted in Australia — found people living in cities were at higher risk of death during extreme temperature events.

“We used an index mapping tool to assess how human populations will fare under a range of heat scenarios,” Amoatey said.

“We found the Heatwave Vulnerability Index, frequently used in other countries, could reliably predict heatwave-related deaths in Australia.

“In analysing data for more than 2000 suburbs, we found city dwellers with low income, low education, diabetes and limited access to health services, were at the highest risk of heatwave-related deaths.

“This was the case for all of Australia’s capital cities, which are home to 70% of Australia’s population.”

‘Heat island effect’

The researchers found that even during low-intensity heatwaves there was a strong association with deaths and the Heatwave Vulnerability Index in Australia’s capital cities.

“We believe the risk is higher in cities because of the ‘heat island effect’, as there are more heat-absorbing surfaces like roads, buildings and railway lines,” Amoatey said.

“In Greater London, for example, research has shown the Heatwave Vulnerability Index could be used to predict an increase in ambulance callouts and mortality rates during heatwaves, which is helpful for health authorities and something we could use in Australia.

“We already have useful tools and state-based action plans to reduce the impact of heatwaves, but we believe a vulnerability index could help supplement this to help communities plan and build resilience.”

Amoatey said a heatwave was considered a period of three consecutive days where the maximum temperature was in the top 5% for that area.

Climate change impacts on heatwave deaths

In a separate study, researchers from UQ and The Australian National University analysed mortality rates during an extreme heatwave in Victoria in January 2009, along with decades of climate data, to examine the impacts of climate change on heat-related deaths.

An estimated 374 excess deaths occurred in Victoria during the five-day event, with maximum temperatures reaching 12–15 degrees above normal.

“Human-induced climate change had increased the excess heatwave-related mortality in the 2009 event by 20%,” Osborne said.

“These findings were in line with other research that shows heat-related deaths are increasing due to human-induced climate change.

“From a public health perspective, our studies and further research can provide guidance on the need for adequate health infrastructure and workforce that might be needed to cope with higher demand for health services during heatwaves.”

The Heatwave Vulnerability Index research is published in Environmental Impact Assessment Review.

The mortality and climate change research was led by ANU’s Professor Sarah Perkins-Kirkpatrick and is published in Environmental Research Climate.

Image credit: iStock.com/Jay_Zynism

World’s Richest Nations Are ‘Exporting Extinction’ With Demand for Agricultural and Forestry Imports: Study

World’s Richest Nations Are ‘Exporting Extinction’ With Demand for Agricultural and Forestry Imports: Study

The richest countries in the world are “exporting extinction” by destroying 15 times more biodiversity globally than they do within their own borders, according to a new Princeton University study. The researchers found that 13.3 percent of biodiversity loss worldwide came from the consumption of high-income countries, a press release from Princeton said. “Biodiversity loss […]
The post World’s Richest Nations Are ‘Exporting Extinction’ With Demand for Agricultural and Forestry Imports: Study appeared first on EcoWatch.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Add your own review

Rating

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.