Search

Fight or flight? The most powerful response is making the business case for sustainability  

We are an online community created around a smart and easy to access information hub which is focused on providing proven global and local insights about sustainability

22 Mar, 2025

This post was originally published on Green Biz

Source: Green Biz

The general business, sustainability, and DEI landscapes are increasingly tense, and in times like these, it’s not uncommon to instinctually choose from three basic responses: fight, flight, or play dead.

Some sustainability leaders and their companies will fight. They see climate change and DEI as core to their values, existential risks, or sources of value worth addressing.  Others will take flight, sometimes because they never really understood the value of sustainability. As a result, CSOs and their teams have lost their jobs and commitments have been rescinded. While most of us will agree this is a shortsighted mistake, it’s not hard to understand why business leaders are afraid.

And then there’s the most common response: playing dead, which amounts to continuing the work but going quiet, especially externally, to avoid attracting undue attention and risk offending stakeholders or facing a backlash. This approach can make a lot of sense given the shifting ground, and predictability—the most valuable asset in the business world—is scarce.

All of these responses are rational. The question becomes which path to choose? Below are three steps for making the business case of sustainability and moving beyond basic instinct.

Find the tangible value

Leaders feel pressure every day to deliver outcomes. They must stand in front of their investors quarterly and reveal progress and setbacks related to profit, loss, revenue, cost control, market share and brand strength. A small, but growing number of leaders may include carbon emissions, water usage, and the odd social metric. However, profitability indicators reign supreme. So how do we help CEOs and boards navigate this moment in the context of their priority outcomes?     

Instead of focusing on our commonly called upon force multipliers – regulation, supply chain engagement, reporting and policy advocacy – we need to return to fundamentals and recognize that sustainability programs deliver tangible value and our job as practitioners is to find and support that value creation. Our research has found companies that apply environmental sustainability concepts save millions of dollars in production costs and reach sales targets that support low emission energy, lower water use, and more circular approaches. Companies have boosted sales by featuring resource traceability that assured consumers that workers in the product’s supply chain were treated fairly. 

We need our version of the “it’s the economy, stupid,” which is the business case. This means advancing the CSO as a strategic business partner who harnesses sustainability as a source of competitive advantage, brand differentiation and operational efficiency.

This isn’t about surrendering principles or becoming captive to corporate inertia. Rather, it means deeply engaging with the machinery and relationships that drive organizational decision-making. This approach doesn’t limit others; sometimes the short term business case is not there, and it’s still time to fight.

Identify competitive differentiation 

To get the calculus right requires identifying strategic intersections where sustainability initiatives simultaneously advance business objectives and societal outcomes — positioning sustainability as a source of competitive differentiation and value creation. It means managing tensions and understanding the archetypes of sustainability value creation.  

We need not view the business case as sacrificing true commitments to environmental and social impact. To the contrary, for years major architects of the ESG and sustainability movement have tried to get companies to spend “real money” on environment and social outcomes. Linking sustainability more directly to the profit engine will better persuade leaders to direct more capex and opex to sustainability than regulation and reporting can. As our “How to Set Sustainability Strategy in 2025” report discusses, companies have become crafty at managing regulatory and reporting workarounds.

Mix art and science

Of course, managing competing interests and tensions is not easy, and every day seems more of a tightrope act. But we have more going for us than we might think. While many have lamented the rise of reporting requirements, these have actually given us much better data upon which to base our decisions and make our case. Creative business leaders can use this data to see which programs are driving value and which aren’t

Sustainability has too long been like the famous saying about advertising where we know that half of it drives value – we just don’t know which half. Data-driven business cases solve this challenge. Discussions about sustainability-advantaged hurdle rates for investments — given their high rate of success compared to other riskier alternatives — are far more common than they once were. Marginal abatement cost curves are making a comeback in the presentations of sustainability teams. There will always be an art to creating the business case, but data provides a much more scientific foundation upon which to build.

The tension resulting from integration efforts makes the sustainability profession challenging. It’s relatively simple to critique from the sidelines, questioning why executives don’t prioritize long-term thinking. It’s far more challenging to earn a seat at the decision-making table, navigate complex trade-offs, occasionally accept suboptimal outcomes, and persistently work to advance sustainability as a driver of commercial success and societal progress. But that is, as they say, the job.

The post Fight or flight? The most powerful response is making the business case for sustainability   appeared first on Trellis.

Pass over the stars to rate this post. Your opinion is always welcome.
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

You may also like…

‘The Science Is What Sets Us Apart’: How the Rodale Institute Has Spent 77 Years Innovating Regenerative Organic Agriculture

‘The Science Is What Sets Us Apart’: How the Rodale Institute Has Spent 77 Years Innovating Regenerative Organic Agriculture

Founded in 1947 by J.I. Rodale, Rodale Institute is a nonprofit dedicated to helping the regenerative organic agriculture movement grow through research, education and farmer training. In his study of regenerative organic farming, Rodale — who came up with the term “organic” — studied Indigenous agricultural practices, including those of communities like the long-lived Hunza […]
The post ‘The Science Is What Sets Us Apart’: How the Rodale Institute Has Spent 77 Years Innovating Regenerative Organic Agriculture appeared first on EcoWatch.

Urban 'placemaking' focus for $85m recreation centre

Urban 'placemaking' focus for $85m recreation centre

Sydney developer Billbergia Group has announced the Rhodes Recreation Centre — an $85 million, 9200 m2 multi-purpose community hub in Sydney’s Inner West.

Located at 6 Gauthorpe St and designed by architectural firm SJB, the recreation centre is in a three-level podium building beneath two high-rise residential towers — the 48-level Peake and 43-level Oasis. Together, they form stage two of the developer’s Rhodes Central Masterplan — a $3 billion, three-stage town centre project.

The Rhodes Recreation Centre was delivered under a $97 million Voluntary Planning Agreement (VPA) between the developer and City of Canada Bay Council. It will be handed over to council next month and is set to open later this year. Once complete, the masterplan will have delivered 25,000 m2 of dedicated public amenity, including retail, community facilities and open space.

With the NSW Government’s housing reforms set to address the housing shortage, the recreation centre will reflect the importance of ‘placemaking’ — a collaborative approach to designing and managing public spaces that enhances community wellbeing and fosters connections between people and their environment — in planning new urban communities.

It also presents a pathway for public and private sectors to collaborate and create social infrastructure while increasing housing supply in fast-growing suburbs.

The recreation centre is set to add vibrancy and pedestrian activity to the local streetscape, providing a diverse range of facilities that enhance the livability of the evolving suburb. These community amenities include two full-sized indoor sports courts, a gymnastics centre, a 70-place childcare centre, a community lounge, allied health services, and bookable spaces for local groups and events. It also provides a gym with cardio equipment, weights, group fitness rooms, a creche and an outdoor terrace, alongside a range of sustainability features.

Facilities at the Rhodes Recreation Centre. Images supplied.

“Rhodes Recreation Centre is the community heart of our high-density TOD development, bringing to life Billbergia’s vision for a future-focused, livable urban environment that prioritises amenity, not just density,” said Saul Moran, Development Director – Planning and Design at Billbergia.

The amenities within the two residential towers include a swimming pool, spa, sauna, children’s play area, library and theatre rooms. Pedestrian connections and through-site links provide access to Rhodes railway station and the Homebush Bay waterfront.

“The Rhodes Recreation Centre stands as a benchmark in successful public–private collaboration. Through a VPA with Canada Bay Council, we’ve created a pathway to unlock additional housing supply while delivering significant, lasting community infrastructure. It’s a clear demonstration of how thoughtful public and private partnerships can shape vibrant, livable neighbourhoods,” Moran said.

Located adjacent to Rhodes railway station, stage one of Billbergia’s Rhodes Central Masterplan was completed in 2021 and included the 13,000 m2 Rhodes Central Shopping Centre, with convenience retail, a Woolworths supermarket, medical facilities and the Bamboo Lane dining precinct.

Other previous projects include the 1.2 ha Phoenix Park in Rhodes, the $63 million Bennelong Bridge, the popular Baylink Shuttle service, the 3500 m2 Wentworth Point Community Centre and Library, and the Wentworth Point Pop-Up Town Square.

Billbergia’s ongoing focus on placemaking and social infrastructure also includes the $8.4 million delivery of a library at its mixed-tenure development, Arncliffe Central, in Sydney’s south. There is the potential for 75% of Arncliffe Central’s dwellings to be dedicated to social, affordable and essential worker rental housing, along with 3400 m2 allocated to childcare, convenience retail and cafes, and a 4000 m2 park with play space for both residents and the broader community.

Top image caption: The Rhodes Recreation Centre location with two planned residential towers, Peake and Oasis. Image supplied.

0 Comments