Search

Enhancing Community Resilience: Addressing Compound and Cascading Climate Shocks

We are an online community created around a smart and easy to access information hub which is focused on providing proven global and local insights about sustainability

28 Aug, 2024

This post was originally published on Climate Links

Enhancing Community Resilience: Addressing Compound and Cascading Climate Shocks
jschoshinski
Mon, 08/26/2024 – 13:11

As climate change accelerates, communities around the world are increasingly vulnerable to both interrelated and simultaneous, seemingly unrelated, risks. Unlike isolated weather events, compound and cascading shocks—where multiple risks interact or one event triggers subsequent crises—pose a growing threat. Complex risk necessitates a shift in how development actors approach international development and climate resilience programs and policies, particularly by integrating comprehensive risk frameworks that account for interdependencies in critical systems.

Understanding Compound and Cascading Shocks

Compound and cascading shocks are distinct yet interconnected concepts. Compound shocks occur when multiple risks, such as extreme weather events, economic disruptions, or pandemics, coincide or interact, amplifying their collective impact. A recent example is the global food security crisis exacerbated by the war in Ukraine, the COVID-19 pandemic, and climate-induced droughts and floods in key agricultural regions. This combination of factors created a “perfect storm” that severely disrupted food supplies and pushed millions into hunger.

Cascading shocks, on the other hand, are triggered when one initial event causes a series of subsequent crises, typically across interconnected systems. The 2020-2022 California drought is one example: historical drought led to a variety of cascading shocks, including declines in agricultural production, wildfires and deteriorating air quality, and a strain on energy supply. These shocks had their own set of impacts—both individually and in combination—including $3 billion in crop revenue losses, health emergencies and increased healthcare costs, biodiversity loss and increased greenhouse gas emissions, and higher energy costs.

Policy and Planning Recommendations

To the extent that development actors are integrating climate risk into their work, we tend to assess the potential impacts of risk by looking at one hazard and sector at a time. Given the growing frequency and severity of these interconnected risks, development actors—including government policymakers, donors, and implementers—must adopt a comprehensive approach to integrating risk into international development and resilience programs and policies, meaning we must consider the possibilities of compound and cascading risk. 

These concerns are not unique to the Global South. The U.S. Government’s Fifth National Climate Assessment (NCA5), particularly Chapter 17 on “Climate Effects on US International Interests,” highlights the increasing importance of accounting for system interdependency in risk management. This involves recognizing how different systems—such as energy, water, food, and health—are interconnected, even across borders and hemispheres, and how a failure in one area can cascade into others. 

To effectively manage these risks, development actors should prioritize the following actions:

  1. Adopt Comprehensive Risk Frameworks: Incorporate strategies that account for the interaction of multiple risks, ensuring that resilience-strengthening efforts robustly address interconnected systems and risks. Tools such as scenario planning, stress testing, and systems mapping can help to ensure programs and policies are developed with a focus on resilience to complex risk.
  2. Strengthen Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Encourage collaboration across sectors and disciplines to address the multifaceted nature of compound and cascading shocks. 
  3. Incorporate Adaptive Management: Develop and implement adaptive management processes, allowing actors to respond quickly to unexpected interactions and impacts.

Opportunities to Address These Shocks

Recognizing and addressing compound and cascading risk is essential for enhancing community resilience. As such, National Adaptation Plans and Nationally Determined Contributions are key opportunities to focus on resilience to complex risk. USAID’s Comprehensive Action for Climate Change Initiative (CACCI) is well-positioned to strengthen risk management by helping countries use comprehensive risk frameworks while designing their climate policies and taking climate action. For example, CACCI is supporting the African Union in implementing its Climate Change and Resilient Development Strategy and Action Plan. This support includes enhancing coordination between regional economic communities and Member States in monitoring and evaluating progress on addressing transboundary and complex climate risks. 

Government policymakers, donors, and implementers can also follow the actions above to strengthen resilience to complex risk in other programs and policies. Together, we can create more robust and resilient systems and communities despite the increasingly complex challenges posed by climate change.

Teaser Text

Complex risk necessitates a shift in how development actors approach international development and climate resilience programs and policies.

Publish Date

Mon, 08/26/2024 – 12:00

Blog Type

Strategic Objective

Region

Sectors

Pass over the stars to rate this post. Your opinion is always welcome.
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

You may also like…

Human Rights Watch Accuses UK of Undermining Democratic Rights With Crackdown on Climate Protesters

Human Rights Watch Accuses UK of Undermining Democratic Rights With Crackdown on Climate Protesters

The United Kingdom’s crackdown on climate protesters is setting a “dangerous” global precedent, according to the UK Director of Human Rights Watch (HRW) Yasmine Ahmed, reported The Guardian. British authorities are undermining democratic rights, particularly the right to protest peacefully, according to HRW’s World Report 2025. “Many of us had hoped that an incoming Labour […]
The post Human Rights Watch Accuses UK of Undermining Democratic Rights With Crackdown on Climate Protesters appeared first on EcoWatch.

Strengthening Community Resilience through Sustainable Non-Timber Forest Products

Strengthening Community Resilience through Sustainable Non-Timber Forest Products

Strengthening Community Resilience through Sustainable Non-Timber Forest Products
jschoshinski
Thu, 01/16/2025 – 18:32

In Zimbabwe, deforestation and habitat loss are not only threatening the country’s biodiversity and ability to mitigate climate change, but also threatening individuals’ livelihoods and their ability to adapt to climate change. Of the nearly 6,000 species of indigenous plants found in the country, some 900 of them are traditionally used as food, cosmetics, or medicine. These non-timber forest products (NTFPs) serve as supplemental sources of income for approximately 60 percent of rural households, providing an important source of income diversification as changes in rainfall—in part due to climate change—threaten traditional agricultural activities. By generating income for rural communities, Zimbabwe’s NTFPs offer a market-led approach to boosting climate resilience. 
The Economic Contribution of Non-Timber Forest Products in Zimbabwe 
In the landscapes where the USAID Resilience ANCHORS Activity works, one in six people, mostly women, rely on forests and wilderness areas for their livelihoods. Resilience ANCHORS supports community-led initiatives and locally prioritized interventions, including conserving forests and developing value chains for key NTFPs, such as Ximenia, mongongo nuts, wooden banana, marula, Kalahari melon seed, and rosella. Forest-based resources from remote, semi-arid regions can contribute up to 35 percent of rural incomes, while NTFP products like thatching grass, wild plant foods, mushrooms, honey, and mopane worms have an estimated annual subsistence value (i.e, the value associated with people using the products to support themselves rather than selling the products) of $294.3 million. Conserving these natural resources leads to strengthened livelihoods and healthier, more stable communities by supporting income diversification, which helps agricultural communities adapt to the impacts of climate change on crop yields.
Using Laws and Regulations to Strengthen Community Resilience
While NTFPs are vital resources for local communities, the lack of transparent laws and regulations has led to overexploitation and missed business opportunities. Limited awareness of the regulatory framework among stakeholders and community members exacerbates this issue. Resilience ANCHORS has supported the formation of NTFP collector groups that have developed formal governance structures, but the next objective is creating long-term sustainability through a robust legal framework that protects the environment and promotes community wellbeing. 
Sustainable harvesting remains critical for the long-term viability of Zimbabwe’s NTFPs, forests, and environment. Resilience ANCHORS, in collaboration with Zimbabwe’s Ministry of Local Government and the Environmental Management Agency, conducted workshops to build awareness of the legislative challenges and foster dialogue. This resulted in the drafting of NTFP Model Bylaw, which seeks to address three key goals:

Fill gaps in the legal framework: Outline benefit-sharing mechanisms to foster fair trade practices, as community ownership and management of NTFPs ensures equitable distribution among stakeholders. 
Promote sustainability: Develop permits to control harvesting, trade volumes, and fees to generate revenue for conservation efforts and capacity-building initiatives.
Provide clear guidelines for NTFP harvesting and benefit-sharing: Specify sustainable harvesting quantities and methods to prevent over-harvesting and safeguard resources for future generations. 

The NTFP Model Bylaw will result in:

Enhanced community resilience through sustainable NTFP management by promoting sustainable livelihoods, environmental conservation, and social cohesion. 
Clarified benefit-sharing mechanisms to reduce exploitation and promote transparency, fairness, and community ownership. 
Informed climate-resilient natural resource management by promoting sustainable harvesting, conserving biodiversity, and enhancing ecosystem resilience. 

Effective implementation of these regulations requires collaboration, capacity-building, and regular monitoring. If adopted and implemented successfully, these regulations could help grow NTFP activities in a way that increases livelihoods and builds community resilience to climate change in Zimbabwe.

Teaser Text
By generating income for rural communities, Zimbabwe’s NTFPs offer a market-led approach to boosting climate resilience.

Publish Date
Thu, 01/16/2025 – 12:00

Author(s)

Itayi Usaiwevhu

Hero Image
Rosella harvest (1).JPG

Blog Type
Blog Post

Strategic Objective

Adaptation

Region

Africa

Topic

Adaptation
Agriculture
Biodiversity Conservation
Deforestation and Commodity Production
Economic Growth
Forest/Forestry
Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities
Natural Climate Solutions
Resilience
Rural

Country

Zimbabwe

Sectors

Adaptation
Agriculture and Food Systems

Show Download Link
Off

0 Comments