Our Articles  |  Brands  | Curated Articles  |  About Us  |  Contact



01— Welcome to
Komoneed

02— About
Komoneed

03— Our Articles

04— Brands

05— Curated
Articles

06— Contact Us

Search

Data centres working to use water responsibly

Komoneed

We are an online community created around a smart and easy to access information hub which is focused on providing proven global and local insights about sustainability

Curated Articles

0 Comment(s)

20 Nov, 2024

This post was originally published on Sustainability Matters

Decisions that go into designing a new data centre will stay in place for many years to come. For instance, the cooling solutions often determine how the facility will consume vital resources such as water and energy. Equinix is committed to using water responsibly, which means we include several considerations about the local water context as we design our data centres.

Last year, we were designing a new data centre in an area where the public had concerns about water stress. The facility was originally intended to use evaporative cooling, which relies on evaporating water to cool the building. The benefit of this approach is that it is substantially more energy efficient than cooling systems that don’t use water.

We conducted an in-depth water stress analysis to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the local water context. This analysis included assessing physical water availability, infrastructure and local resiliency planning to understand how prepared the metro was in case of increased water stress.

Although the metro was well prepared for a drought or other increases in water stress, we decided to switch the building cooling system to use air cooling. Since air cooling consumes substantially less water, we proactively aligned with local concerns about water stress, which reflects our commitment to minimising our impact. However, air cooling also consumes more energy, which is why it isn’t right for every location.

When it comes to balancing the trade-offs between water and energy consumption, getting it right during the design phase is essential, as there are only opportunities for incremental water efficiency improvements after a data centre is operational.

What is water stress?

According to the Pacific Institute, a leading research institute focused on water issues, water scarcity refers only to volumetric availability: the ratio of human water consumption to available water supply in an area. In contrast, water stress is a broader, more inclusive concept. Water scarcity is one aspect of water stress, but it also includes other physical factors, such as water quality and environmental flows, and economic factors such as water accessibility.

Understanding the local water context, including water stress levels, is the foundation of our approach to using water responsibly. In 2023, we codified our commitment to avoid using evaporative cooling in areas with high water stress because using evaporative cooling is by far the largest driver of water consumption in data centres.

How does data centre cooling impact water consumption?

IT equipment running in data centres creates heat, and that heat has to go somewhere. Choosing a cooling solution will determine how a facility consumes water and energy, which are both essential aspects of any data centre operator’s sustainability strategy. However, cooling systems are needed at both the server level and the building level. As servers generate heat, the server-level cooling system moves the heat away from the servers to a heat exchanger, which transfers the heat to the building-level system. The building-level system then rejects the heat from the building.

There are different options for both server-level cooling and building-level cooling:

  • At the server level, air cooling has long been the standard practice, but liquid cooling is becoming more prevalent to support higher server density for AI and other compute-intensive workloads. One misconception about liquid cooling is that it’s the same as evaporative cooling. However, unlike evaporative cooling, liquid cooling doesn’t necessarily increase water consumption because it uses a small amount of water moving continuously in a closed loop, rather than being evaporated.
  • At the building level, the two primary methods for rejecting heat from a data centre are air cooling (or dry cooling) and evaporative cooling. Evaporative cooling can reject the same amount of heat as air cooling while consuming significantly less energy. However, it also consumes significantly more water via evaporation.
     

Data centre designers typically choose between air cooling and evaporative cooling based on the unique climate conditions of each specific location. To determine the most suitable system they’ll consider the local climate (weather), power availability, water stress and other factors. For instance, evaporative cooling can be particularly effective in managing energy usage in areas with power-constrained grids. In contrast, avoiding evaporative cooling in water-stressed areas minimises water consumption, thus ensuring more water remains available for use in the community.

Balancing this trade-off is at the core of our responsible water strategy. In 2023, we use evaporative cooling at only 40% of our data centres globally. We also take advantage of alternative cooling methods where local conditions allow:

  • Geothermal cooling methods such as aquifer thermal energy storage (ATES) and deep lake water cooling (DLWC) utilise natural cooling provided by the Earth’s thermal mass. They draw cold water from large natural sources to circulate through the building-level cooling system, thus causing the water to absorb heat from the heat exchanger. Rather than rejecting it into the atmosphere via evaporating the water, geothermal cooling returns water to its original source. Therefore, the process doesn’t consume water. Similarly, one of our data centres in Toronto uses a DLWC system that pulls cold water from the depths of Lake Ontario. With this approach, we’ve reduced total energy needs for this data centre by 50%, without increasing water consumption.
  • Data centre heat export allows a portion of the heat in a data centre to be transferred to a third-party heat network rather than being rejected into the atmosphere. The heat can then be used for heating homes and businesses. This not only avoids unnecessary water consumption in other buildings’ cooling systems, but also provides a low-carbon heat source for communities. Equinix is pursuing heat export in select locations worldwide. In Paris, heat recovered from our PA10 data centre is transferred to the Plaine Saulnier urban development zone, including a swimming pool used at the recent Paris Summer Olympics.

Improving transparency around water consumption

Recognising that many of our stakeholders want to know more about how we use water and how we’re working to use it more responsibly, we’ve taken steps to increase transparency on our water use.

In 2023, for the first time, we disclosed our water metrics via the CDP water security initiative and included water metrics in our annual sustainability report.

In addition to our water optimisation efforts, our operations team is developing and implementing water efficiency best practices and improving our water metering systems at all existing data centres that use evaporative cooling.

Externally, we are collaborating with our peers and industry working groups to develop measurement frameworks and standards to support water reporting efforts. Earlier this year, we joined the California Water Action Collaborative, a network of diverse stakeholders pursuing collective action projects that improve water security in Equinix’s home state.

We’re also co-funding our first offsite nature project in Finland with Neoen, our local renewable energy partner, to restore 50 hectares of high-value peatland and streams. Since offsite projects like this one often provide both water and biodiversity benefits, we’re sponsoring the development of a framework to account for biodiversity benefits along with water benefits from these kinds of projects.

Image credit: iStock.com/PashaIgnatov

Pass over the stars to rate this post. Your opinion is always welcome.
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

You may also like…

Cybersecurity is about more aspects of ESG than just governance

Cybersecurity is about more aspects of ESG than just governance

25 Jun, 2025

Security operations teams must increasingly do their bit to help their employers achieve environmental targets, which may require some system and strategic changes.

For several years now, annual sustainability reports by listed Australian companies have provided a window into cybersecurity strategies employed at these companies. But in spite of the report name, there is often no link between security and sustainability in the information presented.

As these reports cover environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices, addressing cyber risks comes under the governance piece. Yet, the security team — through its choices of hardware, software and services — has a contribution to make on the sustainability front as well.

It is commonly acknowledged that IT infrastructure and data centres are large energy users. Teams in these spaces have worked to become more efficient: rightsizing infrastructure provisioning to fit workloads, utilising more renewable energy sources, hosting equipment in data centres that are rated to be efficient with power and water consumption and the like.

That same level of investment and effort is yet to be brought to bear on the work of the security team and their technology stack. One reason for this is likely to be the intense pressure that security teams are under to protect ever-increasing attack surfaces and ward off a constantly evolving spectrum of cyber threats.

But this is likely to change.

Security teams need to be prepared to contribute to more than the governance aspect of ESG — they need to contribute to the environmental goals of the organisation as well.

This is starting to be seen in several initiatives. These include the adoption and implementation of more energy-efficient security systems, together with a greater emphasis on proactive and preventative security.

Energy-efficient systems

As with other types of information technology, it continues to be the case that the efficiency of security systems is improving over time with each iteration or update.

A key performance indicator is the energy consumption per gigabit of data throughput for a piece of equipment. Next-generation security gateways are a security-specific example of hardware that continues to get more efficient with each new generation of the technology.

As a case in point, a recent Check Point ESG report showed that a current-generation security gateway uses 73% less power consumption per throughput (Gbps) compared to the previous model. This reduction comes alongside a 112% improvement in threat prevention capabilities, meaning the newer version is more efficient than its predecessor in multiple contexts, not just in energy usage concerns. And, to be clear, this kind of improvement is seen consistently between versions of systems.

This illustrates that next-generation security technologies can simultaneously enhance protection and energy efficiency. By aligning to this cadence of technology upgrades, organisations can consistently reduce their environmental footprint while maintaining effective security controls.

Proactive detection and remediation

Another beneficial strategy when seeking to run security operations more efficiently is to focus more on preventative and proactive forms of security.

The logic here is that reactively dealing with security incidents is an intensive exercise. It is taxing on the individuals that have to perform this work, but also in financial terms. We know that the financial implications of a breach continue to increase over time. One aspect of financial implication is the energy-intensive processes such as restoring backups, along with rebooting, restoring and/or rebuilding entire systems.

Clearly, energy efficiency is not the primary goal of incident response. But from a broader ESG perspective, there is interest in organisations having strong cyber risk and security controls together with layered protections in place to mitigate against the risk of an attack, and/or to detect and isolate any infected infrastructure early on, such that any financial, productivity and bottom-line costs can be avoided. As energy is a considerable financial input to IT costs, it makes sense not to add to these costs due to a cyber incident taking place.

Preventative measures are also required because some existing and emerging types of attacks can run up big energy bills if they go undetected. Cryptomining malware, for example, remains a persistent threat despite its peak in 2018 when it affected 40% of analysed organisations. Even recently, malware such as XMRig has been detected targeting gaming engines. The collective energy consumption of cryptomining is estimated at a staggering 125 terawatt-hours annually — highlighting the need to quickly detect this kind of malicious payload before it can be used to run up a big bill.

Data poisoning in AI systems represents another emerging concern. These attacks compromise machine learning models, often requiring complete retraining to remediate — an extremely energy-intensive process. As organisations increasingly rely on AI-powered tools for decision-making, protecting these systems also means avoiding redundant and costly training cycles that consume substantial computational resources.

The combined benefit

Cybersecurity is more than a governance play — it also has a growing role in helping meet the environmental aspects of an organisation’s ESG strategy. By considering the energy implications of security operations, maintaining infrastructure that is both secure and sustainable, and prioritising a proactive security approach, organisations can protect both their business interests and environmental resources.

Les Williamson, Regional Director Australia and New Zealand, Check Point Software Technologies

Top image credit: iStock.com/Vertigo3d

Recycling Around the World: Lessons From Countries With High Recycling Rates

Recycling Around the World: Lessons From Countries With High Recycling Rates

25 Jun, 2025

Here are the sad facts. Using the EPA’s last statistics for recycling, 292.4 million tons of materials were generated in 2018. That’s almost five pounds of waste per person every day. Of that, only 69 million tons were properly recycled and 25 million tons were composted. That’s only 32.1% that was recycled.There is so much […]
The post Recycling Around the World: Lessons From Countries With High Recycling Rates appeared first on RecycleNation.

“Europe Just Flipped the Switch”: World’s Biggest Sand Battery Goes Live and Instantly Slashes CO2 Emissions by 70%

25 Jun, 2025

IN A NUTSHELL 🔋 Finland launches the world’s first industrial-scale sand battery to store surplus renewable energy as heat. 🌍 The project aims to reduce CO2-equivalent emissions by nearly 70%, supporting Finland’s goal for climate neutrality by 2035. 🔄 This innovative system plays a crucial role in grid stability and promotes a circular economy by […]
The post “Europe Just Flipped the Switch”: World’s Biggest Sand Battery Goes Live and Instantly Slashes CO2 Emissions by 70% appeared first on Sustainability Times.

0 Comments