Search

Critical materials must go circular for energy transition

We are an online community created around a smart and easy to access information hub which is focused on providing proven global and local insights about sustainability

15 Aug, 2024

This post was originally published on Sustainability Matters

There’s no way around mining critical elements. Those materials that are commercially essential but rare are only found in certain regions and prone to price volatility or exposure to social or environmental risks. If we accept that we need them for technologies that replace energy from fossil fuels, the only solution is to mine them. They’re unavailable elsewhere in the volumes we’ll need them, and although we should keep working on substitutes, time is now against us.

This means that sustainable mining practices are crucial. Today, comminution (crushing rocks) accounts for around a third of a mine’s typical energy use. Collectively, this accounts for around 3% of global energy use — just crushing rocks.

For many minerals, we’ve already extracted the rich deposits. The concentration of desired materials in the rocks we mine has reduced significantly since the early 1900s. This means we must crush more rock to get the minerals we seek.

The European Union is heavily focused on sustainable extraction as it aims to produce more of what the region needs at home. Mining can leave visible scars on the landscape, and reports of its environmental and societal impacts are all too common. This means that the bar for a social licence to operate is high. Taking genuine action to promote sustainable mining is vital, but just as important is how we use the materials we extract.

The link between critical minerals and the circular economy

The circular economy is all about retaining manufacturing value. It’s about keeping the products we manufacture in service for longer and how we can reuse, remanufacture and ultimately recycle or reintroduce materials back into the environment to nurture more growth.

Recycling alone isn’t the solution.

A significant challenge in recycling critical materials is the loss of trace elements during the process. When we recycle high-value alloys containing critical minerals, those critical minerals often get lost or diluted through the recycling process. This means that we must replace those critical elements and the only way to do that is to mine some more.

One of the best ways to minimise the impacts of mining — and our exposure to supply risks — is to reduce the material we need. This means using materials for longer and then reusing or remanufacturing components, so we keep their properties and maintain the value added through manufacturing.

Doing this doesn’t reduce what we need to mine to establish our low-carbon future but drastically reduces our need to replace these materials. This, in turn, enables other regions to secure what they need sooner and accelerates the low-carbon transition. It also creates opportunities for new jobs and shelters our economy from supply shortages, price volatility and geopolitical factors that would otherwise undermine our economic resilience.

The role of geopolitics

The geopolitical landscape significantly influences the supply of critical minerals. Countries like China have established a monopoly over certain minerals through state-supported mining and refining processes.

To mitigate supply chain risks, countries must collaborate with friendly nations and adopt circular economy principles. Businesses, particularly in advanced manufacturing, play a vital role in managing these risks. It’s imperative for a business to understand their risks and find ways around them.

Businesses must understand and manage the risks associated with the supply of critical materials. Developing strategies to retain ownership and access to these materials is vital for mitigating supply chain disruptions and ensuring long-term sustainability.

Shifting the mindset

Our traditional economy involves making and selling products. Once we’ve sold the product, we no longer have access to the materials it contains, and we have to buy more. As the demand for materials outstrips supply, our costs and risks increase.

In the circular economy, the focus isn’t on selling the product but on selling the function that the product delivers. A growing number of businesses have adopted this model and now rent access to their products. They retain ownership and continue to have access to the critical materials they’ve already bought. In some cases, this approach has also motivated the business to design better, more durable and more repairable products. Philips’ light-as-a-service is an excellent example of this.

However, one of the most challenging aspects of this transition is changing societal attitudes. A large part of how we define ourselves and broadcast our success in life is through buying things. How do we shift the old markers of success to something else that doesn’t require us to consume vast amounts of material?

What should we aspire to instead as a society and as individuals? The most frequent response to this question is that we need to redefine success in life, shifting our markers from material possessions to free time, experiences, relationships and community contributions.

Sustainable mining and circular economy models are crucial to our economic resilience and to our low-carbon, sustainable future. However, the real challenge is changing what we aspire to and how businesses deliver value to us.

Image credit: iStock.com/piranka

Pass over the stars to rate this post. Your opinion is always welcome.
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

You may also like…

‘Poisoning the Well’ Authors Sharon Udasin and Rachel Frazin on PFAS Contamination and Why It ‘Has Not Received the Attention It Deserves’

‘Poisoning the Well’ Authors Sharon Udasin and Rachel Frazin on PFAS Contamination and Why It ‘Has Not Received the Attention It Deserves’

In the introduction to Sharon Udasin and Rachel Frazin’s new book, Poisoning The Well: How Forever Chemicals Contaminated America, the authors cite an alarming statistic from 2015 that PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) are present in the bodies of an estimated 97% of Americans. How did we ever get to this point? Their book is […]
The post ‘Poisoning the Well’ Authors Sharon Udasin and Rachel Frazin on PFAS Contamination and Why It ‘Has Not Received the Attention It Deserves’ appeared first on EcoWatch.

Turning down the heat: how innovative cooling techniques are tackling the rising costs of AI's energy demands

Turning down the heat: how innovative cooling techniques are tackling the rising costs of AI's energy demands

As enterprises accelerate their AI investments, the energy demand of AI’s power-hungry systems is worrying both the organisations footing the power bills as well as those tasked with supplying reliable electricity. From large language models to digital twins crunching massive datasets to run accurate simulations on complex city systems, AI workloads require a tremendous amount of processing power.

Of course, at the heart of this demand are data centres, which are evolving at breakneck speed to support AI’s growing potential. The International Energy Agency’s AI and Energy Special Report recently predicted that data centre electricity consumption will double by 2030, identifying AI as the most significant driver of this increase.1

The IT leaders examining these staggering predictions are rightly zeroing in on improving the efficiency of these powerful systems. However, the lack of expertise in navigating these intricate systems, combined with the rapidity of innovative developments, is causing heads to spin. Although savvy organisations are baking efficiency considerations into IT projects at the outset, and are looking across the entire AI life cycle for opportunities to minimise impact, many don’t know where to start or are leaving efficiency gains on the table. Most are underutilising the multiple IT efficiency levers that could be pulled to reduce the environmental footprint of their IT, such as using energy-efficient software languages and optimising data use to ensure maximum data efficiency of AI workloads. Among the infrastructure innovations, one of the most exciting advancements we are seeing in data centres is direct liquid cooling (DLC). Because the systems that are running AI workloads are producing more heat, traditional air cooling simply is not enough to keep up with the demands of the superchips in the latest systems.

DLC technology pumps liquid coolants through tubes in direct contact with the processors to dissipate heat and has been proven to keep high-powered AI systems running safely. Switching to DLC has had measurable and transformative impact across multiple environments, showing reductions in cooling power consumption by nearly 90% compared to air cooling in supercomputing systems2.

Thankfully, the benefits of DLC are now also extending beyond supercomputers to reach a broader range of higher-performance servers that support both supercomputing and AI workloads. Shifting DLC from a niche offering to a more mainstream option available across more compute systems is enabling more organisations to tap into the efficiency gains made possible by DLC, which in some cases has been shown to deliver up to 65% in annual power savings3. Combining this kind of cooling innovation with new and improved power-use monitoring tools, able report highly accurate and timely insights, is becoming critical for IT teams wanting to optimise their energy use. All this is a welcome evolution for organisations grappling with rising energy costs and that are carefully considering total cost of ownership (TCO) of their IT systems, and is an area of innovation to watch in the coming years.

In Australia, this kind of technical innovation is especially timely. In March 2024, the Australian Senate established the Select Committee on Adopting Artificial Intelligence to examine the opportunities and impacts of AI technologies4. Among its findings and expert submissions was a clear concern about the energy intensity of AI infrastructure. The committee concluded that the Australian Government legislate for increased regulatory clarity, greater energy efficiency standards, and increased investment in renewable energy solutions. For AI sustainability to succeed, it must be driven by policy to set actionable standards, which then fuel innovative solutions.

Infrastructure solutions like DLC will play a critical role in making this possible — not just in reducing emissions and addressing the energy consumption challenge, but also in supporting the long-term viability of AI development across sectors. We’re already seeing this approach succeed in the real world. For example, the Pawsey Supercomputing Centre in Western Australia has adopted DLC technology to support its demanding research workloads and, in doing so, has significantly reduced energy consumption while maintaining the high performance required for AI and scientific computing. It’s a powerful example of how AI data centres can scale sustainably — and telegraphs an actionable blueprint for others to follow.

Furthermore, industry leaders are shifting how they handle the heat generated by these large computing systems in order to drive further efficiency in AI. Successfully using heat from data centres for other uses will be a vital component to mitigating both overall energy security risks and the efficiency challenges that AI introduces. Data centres are being redesigned to capture by-product heat and use it as a valuable resource, rather than dispose of it as waste heat. Several industries are already benefiting from capturing data centre heat, such as in agriculture for greenhouses, or heating buildings in healthcare and residential facilities. This has been successfully implemented in the UK with the Isambard-AI supercomputer and in Finland with the LUMI supercomputer — setting the bar for AI sustainability best practice globally.

The message is clear: as AI becomes a bigger part of digital transformation projects, so too must the consideration for resource-efficient solutions grow. AI sustainability considerations must be factored into each stage of the AI life cycle, with solutions like DLC playing a part in in a multifaceted IT sustainability blueprint.

By working together with governments to set effective and actionable environmental frameworks and benchmarks, we can encourage the growth and evolution of the AI industry, spurring dynamic innovation in solutions and data centre design for the benefit of all.

1. AI is set to drive surging electricity demand from data centres while offering the potential to transform how the energy sector works – News – IEA
2. https://www.hpe.com/us/en/newsroom/blog-post/2024/08/liquid-cooling-a-cool-approach-for-ai.html
3. HPE introduces next-generation ProLiant servers engineered for advanced security, AI automation and greater performance
4. https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Adopting_Artificial_Intelligence_AI

Image credit: iStock.com/Dragon Claws

0 Comments