Search

‘Coexistence Is Happening’: LA Mountain Lions Change Their Hours to Avoid Recreationists

We are an online community created around a smart and easy to access information hub which is focused on providing proven global and local insights about sustainability

21 Nov, 2024

This post was originally published on Eco Watch

In a symptom of human development pushing native wildlife further outside their natural habitats, mountain lions living in the greater Los Angeles area have been changing the timing of their activities to avoid interactions with hikers, joggers, cyclists and other recreationists, according to a new study led by researchers at University of California, Davis (UC Davis).

The researchers found that mountain lions who lived in areas with more human recreation had shifted to become increasingly nocturnal compared with more remote-dwelling lions, who were primarily active around dawn and dusk, a press release from UC Davis said.

“People are increasingly enjoying recreating in nature, which is fantastic,” said lead author of the study Ellie Bolas, a UC Davis Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Wildlife, Fish and Conservation Biology, in the press release. “This flexibility we see in mountain lion activity is what allows us to share these natural areas together. Mountain lions are doing the work so that coexistence can happen.”

The authors said the findings offered a hopeful example of the coexistence of wildlife and humans in a large, densely populated area.

“Mountain lions prefer to avoid people, but in a metro area of more than 18 million people, natural areas inhabited by mountain lions and other wildlife are also heavily used by recreationists,” the press release said.

To find out if and in what ways mountain lions were shifting their activities in response to the recreationists, the research team monitored 22 lions’ movements in and around the Santa Monica Mountains from 2011 to 2018.

Biologists captured lions living inside the Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area and fitted them with GPS and accelerometer collars. They then analyzed the data, quantifying the area’s human recreational activity using a global database of activities tracked by GPS.

“These results are really important in that they show how humans may be affecting wildlife in less obvious ways than killing them with vehicles,” said Seth Riley, the park’s head of wildlife, in the press release. “The study also continues to drive home the amazing fact that a population of a large felid predator persists in one of the largest urban areas in the world. That would not be possible if mountain lions weren’t able to adjust to human activity in ways like this.”

The findings demonstrated that the highest recreational activity levels were in Griffith Park, while Los Padres National Forest and the Santa Susana Mountains had the least amount of activity.

“The least nocturnal mountain lion was female P13 in the central and western Santa Monica Mountains. Females, in general, were found to be more active closer to sunrise and during daylight hours as compared to males,” the press release said.

Female P13 was the least nocturnal mountain lion studied. National Park Service

The authors said the reason for that could be so female cats can avoid running into males, who pose a danger to them and their kittens.

Two male mountain lions occupying isolated natural areas with an abundance of trails, high recreation levels, surrounding freeways and intense development were the most nocturnal. Both lived in two of the most limited home ranges for adult males ever recorded. The most nocturnal lion in the study — P41 — lived in the small Verdugo Mountain Range, which spans several cities.

Male P41, the most nocturnal mountain lion in the study, who lived in the Verdugo Mountains near Los Angeles, an area with high levels of human recreation. National Park Service

The second most nocturnal of the lions was P22, who lived in Griffith Park and became famous for crossing two busy freeways when he was young. He continued to occupy the area until he was killed in 2022 at 12 years old — one of the most senior cats in the study.

P-22 was among the mountain lions of Los Angeles who shifted his activities to be more nocturnal. National Park Service

The study’s authors said the lions in the study show how mountain lions actively avoid humans when faced with increased activity, rather than habituating themselves to them.

The authors said that doesn’t mean mountain lions should have to do all the work. Humans can help protect them, as well as themselves, by remembering that they are likely to be active at dawn or dusk in populated areas, and be on the lookout for them when driving at night.

In the Los Angeles area, mountain lions face many challenges and dangers, including busy roads where they are often killed, fragmented habitat, exposure to rodenticide and low genetic diversity.

“Even something as innocuous as recreation can add to these other stressors we’re bringing into their lives, potentially by altering the amount of energy they have to expend for hunting and other needs,” Bolas said in the press release. “But we can feel a sense of optimism that they are flexible in the timing of their activity. Coexistence is happening, and it’s in large part because of what mountain lions are doing.”

The study, “Human recreation influences activity of a large carnivore in an urban landscape,” was published in the journal Biological Conservation.

The post ‘Coexistence Is Happening’: LA Mountain Lions Change Their Hours to Avoid Recreationists appeared first on EcoWatch.

Pass over the stars to rate this post. Your opinion is always welcome.
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

You may also like…

Mitigating cybersecurity risks in tomorrow's smart cities

Mitigating cybersecurity risks in tomorrow's smart cities

As global cities embrace the potential of ‘smart’ technology, from optimised traffic management to advanced energy grids, the allure of a more efficient, sustainable and digitally connected urban landscape is becoming a reality.

However, with these advancements come significant cybersecurity challenges that cities must address to ensure the promise of innovation is not overshadowed by the risk of threats. To build the resilient, sustainable cities of tomorrow, cybersecurity must be integrated as a core principle in every step of development.

The evolution of smart cities

Smart cities represent a groundbreaking shift in urban planning and management. These cities integrate advanced technologies like the Internet of Things (IoT), artificial intelligence (AI), and 5G networks to improve city services such as traffic management, waste collection, energy distribution and emergency response.

Countries like Singapore, South Korea and Germany are leading the way, investing billions in smart city technologies. China, as part of its ‘Made in China 2025’ initiative, has outlined an ambitious Smart Cities Development Plan to modernise its urban infrastructure.

Yet, as investment increases, so does the risk. The interconnected nature of smart cities presents an attractive target for cybercriminals, with critical infrastructure systems — such as energy, health care and transportation — vulnerable to cyber attacks that could ripple across the urban landscape.

Key cyberthreats facing smart cities

The list of cybersecurity threats faced by smart cities is diverse. Some have the potential to cause significant disruption to services and cause damage and loss for residents. Some of the most significant include:

Ransomware attacks on critical infrastructure:

Ransomware attacks on city systems are escalating as cybercriminals capitalise on the growing digital footprint of urban infrastructure. Municipalities worldwide have experienced system lockdowns, where attackers demand ransom payments to restore access to critical services.

Public safety system attacks:

Emergency systems, video surveillance and gunshot detection technologies are indispensable for public safety in smart cities. Unfortunately, these systems are prime targets for cyber attacks.

A survey conducted by UC Berkeley’s Centre for Long-Term Cybersecurity1 highlighted emergency alert systems as particularly vulnerable within smart city infrastructure. An attack on these systems could result in widespread panic or delayed response to genuine emergencies.

Data breaches and privacy concerns:

Smart cities collect vast amounts of data on their citizens, from travel patterns to health details. The widespread use of sensors and IoT devices makes these data pools tempting targets for hackers. A successful breach could lead to identity theft, financial fraud and diminished trust in public institutions.

Water supply and sanitation threats:

Attacks targeting water supply systems are a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities within smart city infrastructure. In 2021, hackers attempted to poison the water supply in Oldsmar, Florida, by altering chemical treatment levels. Although thwarted, the incident underscored the dangers posed to critical infrastructure by cyberthreats.

Cyberthreats transcend borders

The interconnected nature of smart cities amplifies the potential impact of cyber attacks, extending beyond individual municipalities. A breach in one city could have cascading effects on neighbouring regions and even disrupt international systems.

For example, a successful attack on a city’s energy grid could affect hospitals, schools and essential services over a wide area. A breach in transportation infrastructure could delay shipments, disrupting global supply chains.

Beyond financial losses, a successful cyber attack can also erode public trust in digital infrastructure, potentially slowing the adoption of smart city technologies that are essential for achieving sustainability goals.

Preparing for tomorrow’s cybersecurity threats

Building resilient smart cities requires comprehensive cybersecurity measures that address vulnerabilities across infrastructure, data and citizen engagement. Key strategies include:

1. Adopting a ‘secure-by-design’ approach:

Cities should embrace a secure-by-design strategy, ensuring cybersecurity is integrated from the earliest stages of technology deployment. This involves rigorous risk assessments and the use of encryption, multi-factor authentication and regular software updates.

2. Cross-sector collaboration:

Protecting smart cities from cyberthreats requires collaboration between government, private sector and technology providers. By sharing threat intelligence and co-ordinating on cybersecurity protocols, public and private entities can respond swiftly to cyber incidents.

3. Investing in cybersecurity talent:

As demand for cybersecurity experts rises, cities must invest in developing a skilled workforce. Governments, educational institutions and businesses should collaborate to create training programs that equip professionals with the skills needed to protect smart city infrastructures.

4. Citizen awareness and cyber hygiene:

Engaging citizens in cybersecurity efforts is crucial for creating a safe digital environment. Public awareness campaigns can teach residents about recognising phishing attempts, securing their devices and reporting suspicious activities. Empowering citizens to practice good cyber hygiene strengthens a city’s overall security.

Building resilient smart cities

The potential of smart cities is vast, offering enhanced quality of life, greater efficiency and sustainable urban living. However, without addressing cybersecurity risks, these benefits could be undermined by significant threats.

By prioritising cybersecurity as a fundamental component of smart city development, cities worldwide can build resilient infrastructures that protect citizens, sustain public trust, and lay the groundwork for a safer, more connected future.

Les Williamson is Regional Director Australia and New Zealand at Check Point Software Technologies, a cybersecurity platform provider of AI-powered, cloud delivered solutions. He has more than three decades of sales and leadership experience in the IT industry, having previously been Head of the AWS Telecommunications Business Unit for Asia Pacific and Japan as well as Vice President for ANZ at Citrix. In addition, he worked for Cisco Systems for more than 10 years in a variety of roles, including as Vice President Asia Pacific.

1. https://cltc.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Smart_City_Cybersecurity.pdf

Top image credit: iStock.com/gremlin

0 Comments