Search

Chemours Chemical Plant Still Polluting West Virginia Water With Toxic PFAS After Almost 25 Years, Lawsuit Claims

We are an online community created around a smart and easy to access information hub which is focused on providing proven global and local insights about sustainability

29 Jan, 2025

This post was originally published on Eco Watch

A Chemours chemical plant in West Virginia is polluting nearby waters with toxic PFAS “forever chemicals,” according to a new lawsuit brought by the West Virginia Rivers Coalition.

The complaint is the most recent in a fight that has been ongoing since 2001 over pollution from the Washington Works plant, reported The Guardian.

The PFAS-contaminated waste is polluting the Ohio River in the town of Parkersburg, home to approximately 50,000 Appalachian residents. The federal complaint claims that waste produced by the factory contains PFAS at levels much higher than allowed by a 2023 discharge permit.

West Virginia Rivers Coalition is seeking enforcement of the agreement from 2023, as well as $66,000 a day in civil penalties for each violation, plus court costs, West Virginia Public Broadcasting reported.

The Chemours plant was the subject of the 2019 film Dark Waters, which told the story of illnesses suffered by Parkersburg residents due to the PFAS pollution, as well as the lawsuit brought against Chemours, formerly a subsidiary of DuPont, reported The Guardian.

A study that arose from the case exposed the health risks of forever chemicals and cost DuPont roughly $700 million.

Local advocates say the recent lawsuit is part of additional legal actions against the plant that have been brought to fill a void left by ineffective regulatory action.

“We have put up with this for 24 years, and [Chemours] is still polluting, they’re still putting this stuff in the water,” said Parkersburg resident Joe Kiger, one of the original plaintiffs, as The Guardian reported.

Among the contaminants listed in the lawsuit are PFAS, PFOA and GenX, all highly toxic chemical compounds that have been found to cause health problems.

The Washington Works plant in Parkersburg, West Virginia on Oct. 28, 2015. Maddie McGarvey / The Washington Post via Getty Images

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has ordered the chemical plant to take steps to correct its actions, but the lawsuit states that it has not. The complaint alleges residents are prevented from enjoying the river for recreation due to the ongoing pollution.

Chemours said in a statement that the “concerns are being addressed” and that it was working with regulators “to navigate both the consent order and the permit renewal process.”

Residents who spoke with The Guardian said most were not aware of continuing hazards from the PFAS pollution.

“They do what they can to make money,” said West Virginia attorney Harry Deitzler, who helped lead previous lawsuits. “The officers in the corporation sometimes don’t care about what’s right and wrong – they need to make money for shareholders and the lawsuits make everyone play by the same rules.”

A large local employer, Chemours invests heavily in charitable giving, and Kiger said many people support the company despite the pollution.

“That’s the kind of stuff you’re up against,” Kiger said. “It could be snowing out and Chemours would tell everyone it’s 80F [27C] and sunny, and everyone will grab their tan lotion.”

A class action lawsuit in 2004 resulted in approximately $70 million for local residents, but the suit failed to prove that PFAS pollution from DuPont was the cause of widespread health problems — including cancer, high cholesterol and kidney disease — in the region.

Rather than dividing the settlement among tens of thousands of the area’s residents, the money was put toward developing the epidemiological study to verify that the local health issues had been caused by pollution from the factory.

The study of roughly 70,000 people in 2012 showed PFOA was the likely cause of the health problems, and later studies demonstrated links between the chemical and other serious health issues affecting local residents.

In 2017 DuPont and Chemours settled roughly 3,500 injury lawsuits for $671 million, and have since paid for the installation of water filtration systems in the region. Chemours also settled an Ohio state suit in 2023 for $110 million over pollution produced primarily by the Washington Works plant.

Rob Bilott, original leader of the class-action suit, said that at times litigation has been the sole way to see meaningful change, since state regulatory agencies, including the EPA, have been periodically staffed with former managers of DuPont or industry allies.

“It’s infuriating,” Bilott said, as reported by The Guardian. “It took decades of making DuPont documents and internal data public, and getting the story out through movies, news articles, books and public engagement, and that’s what finally pushed the needle here. This is the impact of citizens forcing it through decades of litigation.”

The current complaint is a Clean Water Act citizen’s lawsuit, which gives people the power to request the enforcement of federal law in cases where a polluter is in violation and regulators fail to take action.

The EPA has acknowledged the violation by Chemours, but has “taken no further enforcement action regarding Chemours’s violations as of the date of this complaint,” the lawsuit said.

The post Chemours Chemical Plant Still Polluting West Virginia Water With Toxic PFAS After Almost 25 Years, Lawsuit Claims appeared first on EcoWatch.

Pass over the stars to rate this post. Your opinion is always welcome.
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

You may also like…

Smart factory design for Australian-made sustainable fashion

Smart factory design for Australian-made sustainable fashion

The Australian Fashion Council (AFC) and Epson Australia have launched an initiative to evaluate the potential for an AI and digitally powered smart factory to advance Australia’s clothing manufacturing capabilities. The organisations are seeking a qualified research partner to conduct a six-month feasibility study that will create a detailed blueprint for a pilot facility combining digital design and print, automation and AI technologies to rebuild local production.

A clothing smart factory is an automated production facility that enables on-demand, customisable garment manufacturing with minimal waste and fast turnaround times. By bringing together digital design and print and advanced manufacturing technologies with AI-powered systems and analytics, smart factories can enable quick, flexible production runs that respond rapidly to market trends without the high minimum order quantities that can result in overproduction.

Jaana Quaintance-James, CEO of the Australian Fashion Council, said: “This smart factory initiative addresses multiple challenges facing Australian fashion manufacturing, from supply chain disruptions to skills shortages. Our sector is at a critical tipping point. The feasibility study will validate whether a smart factory pilot program can be commercially viable while delivering broader benefits as part of an integrated advanced manufacturing ecosystem.”

Research commissioned by the AFC has estimated that for every $1m invested in returning production to Australia, approximately $1.2m in economic returns could be generated through job creation, technology adoption, strengthened local supply chains and reduced import dependencies.

Craig Heckenberg, Managing Director of Epson Australia.

Craig Heckenberg, Managing Director of Epson Australia, said: “Epson is committed to supporting innovation in Australian manufacturing as we believe Epson’s digital textile printing technology can help build a more sustainable world and improve lives. Our partnership with the AFC and this blueprint and initiative will help local brands, big and small, have access to smart manufacturing capabilities that match their scale and ambition. For smaller brands, it means producing high-quality garments locally, on demand. For larger companies it offers a blueprint to implement smart factory practices within their operations. As a result, we see a future where Australian-made sustainable fashion will set the global standard, leading not just in design, but also in ethical, high-tech manufacturing.”

Why a feasibility study?

Before committing significant resources to establish a smart factory, the AFC and Epson recognise the importance of thoroughly validating the concept and learning from other local and international examples. The comprehensive six-month study will assess market viability, technical requirements, operational models, financial projections, and social and environmental considerations to create a detailed implementation roadmap.

“This isn’t just a research exercise, it’s the foundation for action,” Quaintance-James said. “Following completion of the study toward the end of 2025, we’ll develop a detailed implementation plan to secure investment partnerships, finalise specifications for an initial pilot, develop training programs with educational institutions, and create a governance framework to maximise benefits to the Australian fashion industry.”

“The smart factory concept represents a transformative shift toward ‘rapid agile’ on-demand manufacturing,” Heckenberg said. “Rather than speculative production, this approach enables creating products in response to actual consumer demand, simultaneously addressing profitability challenges and environmental concerns.”

Call for research partners

The initiative aims to retain sovereign manufacturing capability, rebuild local supply chains, drive digital innovation, and upskill the workforce through educational partnerships.

Research partners may be Australian-based or international organisations with the capacity to conduct a thorough feasibility study that delivers actionable recommendations. Interested parties should submit their expressions of interest by 15 June 2025.

Top image credit: iStock.com/eternalcreative

Time to Fix the Broken Equal Access to Justice Act

Time to Fix the Broken Equal Access to Justice Act

The Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) was created with good intentions—to protect individuals and small businesses from being steamrolled by the federal government. Passed in 1980, EAJA was meant to level the playing field by reimbursing legal costs when

0 Comments