Search

Chemicals in Pet Flea Treatments Are Leading to Songbird Deaths, Report Finds

We are an online community created around a smart and easy to access information hub which is focused on providing proven global and local insights about sustainability

30 Jan, 2025

This post was originally published on Eco Watch

In a new study, scientists are raising concerns over the ways that flea treatment chemicals for pets can leach into the environment and harm local wildlife. In light of the study, experts are calling on veterinarians to minimize preventative flea treatments to protect songbirds and insects impacted by the chemicals in these treatments.

Scientists from the University of Sussex published a study revealing that nests lined with fur were exposing blue tit and great tit songbirds to chemicals found in common veterinary drugs. The team tested for 20 total chemicals, of which they found 17 present, across 103 different nests.

The most common chemicals included fipronil, found in 100% of the nests, as well as imidacloprid (found in 89.1% of nests) and permethrin (also found in 89.1% of the samples).

Further, the research also revealed that nests with higher number of insecticides, higher concentrations of insecticides, or higher concentrations of fipronil, imidacloprid or permethrin specifically also had higher numbers of unhatched eggs or dead offspring.

“No nest was free from insecticides in our study, and this significant presence of harmful chemicals could be having devastating consequences on the UK’s bird populations,” Cannelle Tassin de Montaigu, lead author of the study and a research and associate fellow at the University of Sussex, said in a statement.

As The Guardian reported, some of the chemicals detected in the study have been banned in the UK and the EU, but not for use in veterinary drugs. Fipronil is banned for agricultural use in the UK and EU, and imidacloprid’s use for plant protection is banned in the EU and could soon be banned in the UK for agricultural use. 

In the meantime, experts, including veterinarians, are calling on reduced usage of veterinary drugs for flea and tick prevention. Neither experts nor the study authors are telling pet owners to forgo flea and tick treatments. As recommended by the British Veterinary Association, pet owners should skip year-round, blanket treatments of these chemicals and only use them as needed. 

“We are a nation of pet lovers and bird lovers, and it is extremely concerning to see the alarming levels of toxic pesticides in bird nests from veterinary drugs,” said Sue Morgan, chief executive of SongBird Survival, a charity that funded the study. “Pet owners will be upset to hear that in trying to do the right thing to support their pets with fleas and ticks, they could be harming our ecosystem, resulting in dead newborn chicks and unhatched eggs. As pet owners, we need to have confidence that we are keeping our pets well, without devastating impacts on our wildlife.” 

A goldfinch gathers cat fur from a rosemary bush. Andi Edwards / iStock / Getty Images Plus

According to the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), pet owners can prevent and treat fleas through other methods, such as regularly combing pet fur with a fine-tooth comb, and washing pets with warm water and common soaps that are pet-safe, which together can kill fleas without the added chemicals. The organization also recommended that pet owners regularly clean areas where pets sleep and rest, such as their beds or sofas, and minimize fleas by applying nematodes in yards and gardens.

The researchers and SongBird Survival are also calling on governmental agencies to conduct more risk assessments on how veterinary drugs impact the environment, and establish policies to address those risks.

The post Chemicals in Pet Flea Treatments Are Leading to Songbird Deaths, Report Finds appeared first on EcoWatch.

Pass over the stars to rate this post. Your opinion is always welcome.
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

You may also like…

Smart factory design for Australian-made sustainable fashion

Smart factory design for Australian-made sustainable fashion

The Australian Fashion Council (AFC) and Epson Australia have launched an initiative to evaluate the potential for an AI and digitally powered smart factory to advance Australia’s clothing manufacturing capabilities. The organisations are seeking a qualified research partner to conduct a six-month feasibility study that will create a detailed blueprint for a pilot facility combining digital design and print, automation and AI technologies to rebuild local production.

A clothing smart factory is an automated production facility that enables on-demand, customisable garment manufacturing with minimal waste and fast turnaround times. By bringing together digital design and print and advanced manufacturing technologies with AI-powered systems and analytics, smart factories can enable quick, flexible production runs that respond rapidly to market trends without the high minimum order quantities that can result in overproduction.

Jaana Quaintance-James, CEO of the Australian Fashion Council, said: “This smart factory initiative addresses multiple challenges facing Australian fashion manufacturing, from supply chain disruptions to skills shortages. Our sector is at a critical tipping point. The feasibility study will validate whether a smart factory pilot program can be commercially viable while delivering broader benefits as part of an integrated advanced manufacturing ecosystem.”

Research commissioned by the AFC has estimated that for every $1m invested in returning production to Australia, approximately $1.2m in economic returns could be generated through job creation, technology adoption, strengthened local supply chains and reduced import dependencies.

Craig Heckenberg, Managing Director of Epson Australia.

Craig Heckenberg, Managing Director of Epson Australia, said: “Epson is committed to supporting innovation in Australian manufacturing as we believe Epson’s digital textile printing technology can help build a more sustainable world and improve lives. Our partnership with the AFC and this blueprint and initiative will help local brands, big and small, have access to smart manufacturing capabilities that match their scale and ambition. For smaller brands, it means producing high-quality garments locally, on demand. For larger companies it offers a blueprint to implement smart factory practices within their operations. As a result, we see a future where Australian-made sustainable fashion will set the global standard, leading not just in design, but also in ethical, high-tech manufacturing.”

Why a feasibility study?

Before committing significant resources to establish a smart factory, the AFC and Epson recognise the importance of thoroughly validating the concept and learning from other local and international examples. The comprehensive six-month study will assess market viability, technical requirements, operational models, financial projections, and social and environmental considerations to create a detailed implementation roadmap.

“This isn’t just a research exercise, it’s the foundation for action,” Quaintance-James said. “Following completion of the study toward the end of 2025, we’ll develop a detailed implementation plan to secure investment partnerships, finalise specifications for an initial pilot, develop training programs with educational institutions, and create a governance framework to maximise benefits to the Australian fashion industry.”

“The smart factory concept represents a transformative shift toward ‘rapid agile’ on-demand manufacturing,” Heckenberg said. “Rather than speculative production, this approach enables creating products in response to actual consumer demand, simultaneously addressing profitability challenges and environmental concerns.”

Call for research partners

The initiative aims to retain sovereign manufacturing capability, rebuild local supply chains, drive digital innovation, and upskill the workforce through educational partnerships.

Research partners may be Australian-based or international organisations with the capacity to conduct a thorough feasibility study that delivers actionable recommendations. Interested parties should submit their expressions of interest by 15 June 2025.

Top image credit: iStock.com/eternalcreative

Time to Fix the Broken Equal Access to Justice Act

Time to Fix the Broken Equal Access to Justice Act

The Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) was created with good intentions—to protect individuals and small businesses from being steamrolled by the federal government. Passed in 1980, EAJA was meant to level the playing field by reimbursing legal costs when

0 Comments