Search

Can Digital Product Passports Help Make Fashion More Sustainable?

We are an online community created around a smart and easy to access information hub which is focused on providing proven global and local insights about sustainability

03 Jun, 2024

This post was originally published on Good on You

Digital product passports have been around for a while, but as the European Union looks set to mandate them in the next few years, we look at what they are, and the impact they’ll have in making fashion more sustainable.

What is a digital product passport?

In the same way that your own passport holds core details of who you are and records where you’ve been through a series of official stamps, a digital product passport does a similar thing for products. Proponents believe product passports could support the shift towards a more circular industry by consistently and reliably harnessing information such as raw material origins, durability, care instructions, and repairability and making it available to the likes of retailers, recyclers, and consumers.

Digital product passports have been around for a while and at the moment, are used voluntarily across the fashion industry by brands including Nobody’s Child, Artknit Studios, Moncler, and Mr Porter’s in-house label, Mr P.

The European Commission’s digital product passport

You might be hearing more about digital product passports now because the European Commission looks likely to mandate them for certain items in the European Union, and textile products—along with batteries and toys—will be among the first product categories to have passports implemented.

It’s all part of the European Commission’s Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR), which is expected to be approved in 2024 and implemented in 2026. The Commission is the first regulator in the world to mandate digital product passports across multiple industries. And while this regulation is currently only aimed at products brought to market in the EU, it’ll have a much wider impact because so many supply chains are global. This could represent a step towards the legislated publication of traceability and sustainability information.

The European Commission’s proposal outlines some requirements for the passports that look to be mandated, but the wider landscape of product passport solutions can vary quite a lot from provider to provider. Below, we’re taking a broad look at how product passports actually work in general and what their impacts could be for consumer empowerment.

 

How do digital product passports work?

Products are each given a unique identifier that’s visible on the item itself, its packaging, the documents that come with it, or the webpage it’s listed for sale on. This could be a QR code, RFID tag or barcode, which links to formalised data that may include everything from the origin and nature of a garment’s material to the factory in which it was sewn.

While most of this information will be widely available in the passport, access to some data could be limited to specific users, such as recyclers or retailers.

 

A tool for greater circularity and transparency?

This collection of data from across a product’s lifecycle could help businesses better understand the processes and environmental impact behind the things they’re making, and how their products comply with other sustainability regulations.

Passports could also help businesses to offer repair, recycling and reuse services by directing customers to points for each service and also sharing details on what elements of a product are recyclable with sorting organisations—something that’s key in shifting to a circular fashion model. Detailing exactly what materials are incorporated into a product, for example, the percentage of cotton in a polycotton blend or the fibre content of threads used in stitching, could improve recycling and reuse at the end of the item’s life.

Visibility on repairs and resale (which could be bookable through the passport itself) could make it easier for products to be kept in circulation for as long as possible, rather than being sent to landfill.

It’s a similar story for end-of-life management information. When businesses supply details about safely disposing of the non-recyclable elements in their products, there’s less chance of toxic or dangerous materials ending up in landfill or harming the environment.

Another potential benefit of the digital product passport is that it could help inform consumers about the sustainability of products. And in luxury fashion, specifically, passports could be vital in demonstrating product authenticity to a degree that hasn’t been seen before, instilling more trust in customers making big purchases and potentially increasing their resale value down the line.

While proponents suggest that passports will give shoppers greater access to information about where their purchases come from, questions remain about the ease of access and product comparability as product passports become more common, particularly if the information’s formatting and level of detail varies from brand to brand.

This collection of data could help businesses better understand the environmental impact behind the things they’re making

Good On You’s CEO Gordon Renouf thinks this aspect of the passport could be more hype than substance. He cites the effort involved in a consumer seeking out the passport’s information, digesting it, and understanding it in context as key problems that need to be solved before a passport can provide consumers with information they can rely on.

For example, Renouf says that information about a product’s CO2 emissions or material composition could lack context and be confusing to consumers: “The overall behaviour of a brand, for example its climate change actions and engagement with workers’ rights, has a more significant impact than product-level attributes. To achieve sustainability goals we need to change overall company practice, not demonstrate that individual products do better on narrow criteria.”

Katelin Opferkuch, ratings analyst at Good On You, underscores the need for comparability across product passports:  “Providing the same format for supply chain information would make it easier for highly motivated consumers or third parties like Good On You to identify which brands are making the effort to disclose legitimate information and which brands don’t have complete data.”

These are only a few of the challenges businesses and consumers face in implementing and using digital product passports. Addressing these questions will be key to unlocking the promised benefits.

 

The challenges of digital product passports

One of the biggest challenges is data storage. It will require a significant time and cost investment to arrange the infrastructure to hold vast amounts of product data, particularly for companies with large product inventories.

And then there’s data security—vital for reliable passports and traceability, but another potentially significant investment.

Formatting this data and making sure it complies with any future regulation accompanying the passport could also be a challenge. Dozens of businesses have already emerged to address these requirements, for example, Renoon, Fairly Made, and EON. Good On You hasn’t tested these software solutions, and they’re just a few of the many businesses offering product passport solutions for brands that are seeing an uptake in their services across the industry.

EON’s vice president, Nicole Rigas, dubs the passport a “digital twin” for every product, and explains that the company will use a cloud model alongside pre-built infrastructure to integrate into brands’ existing workflows.

Rigas believes that another challenge for brands will be getting all teams throughout a business—and its supply chain—on board to unify their data. That’s tricky, she explains, because “each of these different departments often has its own desired functionalities and use cases, from driving circular business processes to brand protection to customer engagement.”

And it’s not just brands that will need to invest in data management and new processes to meet requirements if passports are mandated by the European Commission. Opferkuch points out that the financial and organisational onus for a lot of supply chain information is likely to fall on suppliers outside of the European Union. “It will require new employees, skills, and systems to manage all the data requests, and suppliers will be at a competitive disadvantage if they don’t do this. In theory, this should push suppliers to improve the sustainability of their practices, but it’s not as straightforward as that, especially if they won’t earn extra money for putting all this in place,” she explains.

Since transparency is key to digital product passports, the brands that are already tracing their supply chains and have disclosure systems in place will be in a much better position to adopt passports when they’re mandated across the industry.

 

Will digital product passports make fashion more sustainable?

The industry experts we spoke to have differing opinions on the nuances of digital product passports, but they all agree that the potential for enhancing supply chain traceability is a good thing.

“Digital product passports solve some of fashion’s biggest challenges for brands, customers and circular businesses… It’s a simple shift with enormous potential for industry transformation,” says Rigas.

Renouf, however, has mixed views about the overall impact of passports. He says their ability to provide additional and more reliable information to businesses in the supply chain is a definite plus, and knowing what materials a product is made from, for example, will support reuse and save costs in recycling.

But Renouf thinks the idea that passports are an effective way to drive consumer action is a stretch: “There is little evidence that consumers will flock to their scanners to access information at the point of sale. Even if they do, the information from a passport is not the easy-to-use, comprehensive data consumers need. Nor does it tell the full story: in particular, there is nothing about the performance of the brand overall—the key driver of fashion’s impact on workers and the environment.”

Meanwhile, Georgia-Rae Taylor, sustainability strategy director at Eco-Age, has concerns about the industry’s readiness: “The potential of digital product passports is massive—they could bring a whole new level of transparency and accountability to products and supply chains.”

Taylor continues: “However, despite the promise, the fashion industry—among others—remains largely unprepared for the passport era. Supply chains are very opaque, and brands struggle with gaps in product data and a lack of understanding regarding inherent risks.”

The world’s most polluting industries have proven time and time again that they can’t be trusted to make the deep change needed to move towards a more sustainable world. Mandating consistent information disclosure is a great step forward, though whether passports live up to their hype remains an open question.

The post Can Digital Product Passports Help Make Fashion More Sustainable? appeared first on Good On You.

Pass over the stars to rate this post. Your opinion is always welcome.
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

You may also like…

Energy Efficiency as an Imperative Climate Strategy

Energy Efficiency as an Imperative Climate Strategy

With mandatory climate statement disclosure rolling out in Australia, businesses need to start reporting on their emissions and sustainability plans for the future. As companies begin assessing the relevant risks and opportunities related to various climate scenarios, energy efficiency presents itself as an immediate climate-strategy with long-term benefits.

Commencing 1 January 2025, businesses that meet two of the three conditions — more than 500 employees, gross assets above $1 billion or $500 million or more in consolidated gross revenue — are required to lodge a climate statement, which discloses their climate-related plans, financial risks and obligations. As part of the gradual roll-out, by 1 July 2027, businesses that meet two of these conditions — more than 100 employees, gross assets above $25 million or exceeding $50 million in consolidated gross revenue — will also be required to report.

This climate statement will need to include the company’s sustainability governance, climate risks and opportunities, including those physical and transition related. They will also need to disclose their Scope 1 and 2 emissions, strategy to decarbonise, and conduct scenario analysis on the short, medium and long term impacts on the business. By the second year of reporting, businesses will also be expected to report on Scope 3 emissions.

Scenario analysis will be based on various assumptions of the state of the climate, one of which includes a possible future where global temperature has increased 2.5°C or more. They will be required to share their climate strategy and steps they are taking long-term in preparation for this scenario.

Common themes within climate strategies will include switching to renewable energy sources, electrifying fleet vehicles, purchasing carbon credits, and carbon capture and storage. Many of these methods look at reducing emissions through the energy source, or targeting the carbon aspect directly; however, climate strategies can also include reducing the amount of energy used. By investing in more energy efficient equipment, sites can maintain production whilst using less energy and producing less emissions.

When increasing energy efficiency and reducing energy consumption first, businesses will see short-term impacts; however, in the long term, they are also improving their foundation for an energy transition. Assuming no other changes, higher energy efficiency can lead to decreased energy demand, allowing for reduced system requirements when specifying and planning for self-generation or energy costs.

To understand what opportunities are available for upgrading to more energy efficient equipment, businesses can start with an energy audit to understand how energy is being consumed across site. Energy audits, like the ABB Energy Appraisal, can provide a roadmap for where and how equipment can be upgraded for the best energy saving potential. An energy audit identifies areas that can be immediately improved with existing equipment on the market, so there is no need to wait for the commercialization or development of more sustainable technology. Going beyond just changing all lights to LEDs, efficiency recommendations may include areas where variable speed drives can be added to control motor speed or upgrading from an IE3 motor to an IE5 ultra-premium efficiency or IE6 hyper-premium efficiency motor to reduce energy losses by 40% or more. This area can often be overlooked on sites as the Minimum Energy Performance Standard (MEPS) in Australia for motors is just IE2.

Mostly used in pumps, compressors, conveyors and fans, motors may seem like a minor part of a site; however, with 45% of the world’s electricity converted into motion by industrial electric motors, there are many opportunities for energy savings. In fact, a recent survey commissioned by ABB IEC Low voltage motors, showed that 92% of surveyed businesses in Australia recognize the important role of electric motors in achieving sustainability targets. In this same survey, participants ranked a reduction in operating cost as a more important driver for investing in energy efficiency than lowering their organization’s emissions. This is because upgrading to newer, more efficient equipment provides benefits beyond just emission reduction. For example, ABB’s Synchronous Reluctance (SynRM) Motors, available in IE5 ultra-premium efficiency or IE6 hyper-premium efficiency, use no rare earth metals or magnets. Running quieter and with bearing temperatures reduced by up to 15°C and winding temperatures by up to 30°, SynRM motors have longer maintenance periods, superior reliability, and contribute to a better operational environment.

Looking ahead, upgrading to an IE5 SynRM motor also provides more visibility into Scope 3 emissions, as SynRM motors meet ABB’s circularity criteria and transparency on environmental impact is provided through Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs).

By requiring companies to disclose their climate information, these new legal requirements are opening the door and facilitating more internal discussions on environmental impact and emission reduction. Whilst mandatory climate reporting is only required of large business entities this year, the progressive roll-out and Scope 3 emission reporting requirements mean that businesses of all sizes in Australia will be impacted by these new requirements. As businesses become more conscious of how sustainability should be integrated into their operations and finances, there is no better time to start investing in energy efficient solutions.

For more information, click here.

Image credit: iStock.com/denizunlusu

0 Comments