Search

9 Industry Insiders on What Sustainable Luxury Fashion Really Means

We are an online community created around a smart and easy to access information hub which is focused on providing proven global and local insights about sustainability

26 Mar, 2025

This post was originally published on Good on You

This week, the Institute of Positive Fashion Forum will seek to push the industry closer to circularity and net-zero targets through a range of keynotes and panel sessions. But what does a better future really look like? 

Shailja Dubé, the Institute’s deputy director, believes stringent target setting and driving equity through the supply chain are key. That’s echoed here by nine fashion industry experts, including designer Amy Powney, sustainability consultants Tom Berry and Harriet Vocking, and more, that we asked about their vision of a truly sustainable future in luxury fashion. 

These conversations showcase the breadth of ethical questions in 2025—no longer are discussions about sustainable luxury limited to its most conspicuous issues, like the use of fur and exotic animal skin. That’s not out of ignorance or because they’re not still an issue, but because everyone from consumers to activists is empowered to ask deeper questions about the notoriously secretive industry.

It’s a pivotal moment for the sector. At the same time as political shifts threaten sustainability initiatives across the board, rising prices are frustrating shoppers. Analysts are warning of a downturn. Consumers are craving in-person experiences in the face of AI and infinite scroll. And recent allegations of labour exploitation in Loro Piana, Dior, and Armani’s supply chains have underlined that the vision consumers are sold of luxury manufacturing doesn’t match the reality.

Brittany Sierra, founder of Sustainable Fashion Forum, says these high standards, which were long assumed to be integral to luxury’s DNA, are the reason it has mostly fallen under the sustainability radar until now: “Brands are now being scrutinised for cutting corners on quality and sustainability while still charging premium prices.”

Sierra underlines the power and influence that luxury brands have over consumer culture and mindset—another key point the experts we interviewed shared—and therefore an opportunity to shape the wider sustainability landscape through leading by example.

Here’s what nine industry insiders think that should look like.

 

Shailja Dubé, Deputy Director, Institute of Positive Fashion:

‘A holistic approach is needed in the face of global turbulence’

We are living in turbulent times, and geopolitical forces are impacting local and global economic systems. From a citizen and luxury customer perspective, there is even more focus on being custodians of our garments and looking after them with greater care and longevity in mind.

I would love to see the luxury sector continue to strengthen climate and nature goals of its practices, from net-zero targets to using lower impact materials. There is a need to continue to raise awareness and drive social change and equity through the supply chain, to putting more focus on diversity and inclusion programmes.

 

Tom Berry, sustainable fashion business consultant, ex-Farfetch

‘Luxury companies strongly impact on the culture surrounding fashion’

Luxury fashion companies hold a unique position when it comes to sustainability. They can invest more than others in materials, so could prioritise preferred materials from lower-impact sources, and invest in sustainable material innovations beyond the reach of others.

They often have closer relationships with smaller scale suppliers, so could ensure those relationships are positive for people working in their value chain. They tend to invest more than others in design and quality, so could ensure that items are designed for durability and recycling—which in turn allows them to invest in business models like rental, resale, and repair that help extend the life of the items they sell.

However, not all luxury companies invest in these more sustainable forms of materials, supply chain, design, and business models, or if they do, they don’t talk about it. Luxury companies have a very strong impact on the culture that surrounds fashion, setting the bar for aspiration in the industry as a whole, so the lack of transparent communication on their efforts is a missed opportunity for them, and for progress in the industry.

 

Brittany Sierra, founder of Sustainable Fashion Forum, host of the Green Behavior podcast

‘Brands need to build prestige through cultural resonance’

Modern sustainable luxury is defined by a brand upholding the traditional markers of luxury—high-quality craftsmanship, premium materials, and exclusivity—while actively engaging in environmental responsibility, ethical production, and transparent business practices.

There are two key dynamics at play:

For sustainable brands aspiring to luxury status, it’s not enough to simply focus on responsible production and lower-impact materials. To truly be considered luxury, they need to cultivate brand affinity, creating a strong sense of social currency, and cultural relevance. Luxury isn’t just about the product itself—it’s about the status and emotional connection it generates within a community. These brands need to build prestige through cultural resonance, allowing consumers to feel they’re part of something bigger.

For established luxury brands, the challenge is different. They need to commit to sustainability in a transparent and meaningful way, ensuring their high standards of craftsmanship and exclusivity are matched by a genuine dedication to ethical practices.

I also believe the definition of exclusivity is changing. Rather than being solely about class and inaccessibility, modern sustainable luxury can be inclusive and accessible, while still delivering exclusivity through values, design, and cultural influence.

The future of luxury will be defined not only by quality and the prestige of a name but by the values it upholds, the cultural relevance it maintains, and the positive impact it seeks to make on the world.

 

JD Shadel, editor-at-large at Good On You

‘Sustainable luxury requires reimagining the architecture of desire’

Luxury has always been as much about storytelling as materials or craft. What’s changing now, in my view, is that the most compelling luxury narratives are no longer about scarcity or exclusivity alone, but about permanence in an era of disposability.

The media ecosystem around luxury has traditionally thrived on novelty — an accelerating churn of collections and micro-trends that encourage consumption rather than celebrate longevity. It’s not merely about “slowing down.” It’s changing the system. The most forward-thinking brands are now investing in storytelling approaches that challenge this acceleration.

Luxury brands have a unique opportunity to reshape how consumers understand value, particularly in supporting artisanal communities and heritage practices that embody deeper relationships with both materials and makers. As it so happens, this approach also aligns directly with the UN’s Sustainable Development Goal #12 on responsible consumption.

What’s particularly interesting is how this shift meets broader cultural currents. Just as people increasingly crave offline experiences, they’re seeking brands with genuine heritage. The luxury sector can lead by decoupling creative expression from volume-driven business models.

In a media ecosystem where we’re now seeing slop synthetic content to promote synthetic fast fashion products, the most genuine luxury might be thoughtful media that helps us want better rather than merely wanting more — design and editorial approaches that honour complexity rather than reducing sustainability to simplistic slogans.

 

Amy Powney, former creative director at Mother of Pearl

‘It all comes down to reconnecting with nature’

Sustainable luxury fashion is about slowing things down, which mirrors what I feel humanity needs in general.

It’s about finding those timeless, forever pieces that resonate with you and that have really beautiful quality and craftsmanship. Having time to think and form your own opinions on what products you need to build your wardrobe, rather than being told what you should look like or following trends.

I think we need to take a deep breath and look at what we’re consuming, how fast-paced the world is, how much information we’re being fed on a daily basis, and how that makes consumption rampant. We’re on an unsustainable trajectory of overstimulation and overconsumption, which is driven by social media. Luxury is the ability to step away from that.

Fundamentally, it all comes down to reconnecting with nature in the end—if we restore that and we begin to understand what we own and where it comes from, then we can change the levels of respect for the world around us and the things we buy.

 

Sarah Needham, senior director of engagement and partnerships at Textile Exchange

‘A high price point must reflect the labour that has gone into production’

The luxury fashion sector has a unique opportunity to drive beneficial climate and nature impacts through the intimate relationships it holds with both its customers and its supply chain. There are already great examples of how some luxury fashion brands are making the most of their direct and long-standing relationships with their suppliers and raw material producers to support best practices in relation to regenerative, animal welfare and human rights in particular.

Sustainable luxury fashion, with a focus on longevity and quality, can weave into its campaigns, storytelling and business models the importance of slower production models that are not driving the depletion and extraction of finite resources.

Some of the terms most commonly associated with luxury are becoming synonymous with sustainability, where a high quality material has to mean it is a preferred one, where a high price point has to accurately reflect the labour that has gone into its production, and where rarity has to mean it is part of a slower production model. It is really exciting to see these shifts develop with new sustainable fashion brands that are embedding these principles from the onset.

 

Jessica Ouano, ratings analyst at Good On You

‘We need to place more value on Indigenous and minority cultures’

Many consumers value the brands more than the craft, culture, and the makers behind the product. For instance, a consumer might be willing to spend £2000 for a handmade bag by a globally renowned luxury brand, but they wouldn’t spend the same for one that’s handcrafted by an artisan from an Indigenous community. Even if the latter took longer to make, it is not valued equally.

Not everyone realises that the ways of dressing, handcrafted textiles and cultures of several Indigenous and minority communities have been used by luxury brands as a source of inspiration for their products, without giving proper credit and benefit to the communities where they originated from. I believe sustainable luxury is about addressing the issue of cultural appropriation and the erasure or devaluing of Indigenous and minority cultures.

Luxury fashion brands have the power to create desire and value, and they should use that to open up spaces and opportunities for diverse cultures to be recognised and valued more deeply by consumers. This means encouraging consumers to reflect more deeply on the craftsmanship behind the products and the significant cultural value they hold. And if a luxury brand intends to take inspiration from an indigenous community’s culture, they should get permission from the community and learn as much as they can about the culture by having conversations and spending time with them. If the community is interested in collaboration, the brand can facilitate a cultural exchange where they co-create designs with the community. Through this, the community can make sure their culture is represented by the brand in an appropriate way. Lastly, these communities also need to be compensated fairly for the use of their cultural heritage.

 

Harriet Vocking, founder of For.Tomorrow consultancy, ex-Eco-Age

‘Sustainable luxury fashion is an item that you are going to cherish forever’

Sustainable luxury fashion is less about brand names and trends, but more about an item that you are going to cherish forever.

True luxury is knowing that you have invested in a piece that has been lovingly crafted and that your purchase is having a positive impact. Sustainable luxury is about using your purchasing power to uplift the brands that have positive social and environmental values held close to their heart. Buy less, but buy products that look great whilst making a difference.

 

Nina Gbor, founder of Eco Styles, and sustainable fashion educator

‘We need ethically made, sourced, and justly paid resources and materials’

To do justice to the term sustainable luxury fashion, its definition should include couture that is made with the highest standard of natural fibres, excellent craftsmanship that will last many years and stay in good condition to be passed on to others, circular design (so that it can be reused, repurposed easily without waste), artisanal design, no toxic chemicals used in making the garments.

Often the discourse around the term ‘sustainable’ focuses on the environment and leaves out the human and animal wellbeing in fashion’s supply chain. But sustainable luxury fashion should include liveable wages for workers throughout the supply chain with no modern slavery involved in making the garment; and ethical treatment of animals in the supply chain. We need ethically made, sourced and justly paid resources and materials.

The post 9 Industry Insiders on What Sustainable Luxury Fashion Really Means appeared first on Good On You.

Pass over the stars to rate this post. Your opinion is always welcome.
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

You may also like…

Taking the electronic pulse of the circular economy

Taking the electronic pulse of the circular economy

In June, I had the privilege of attending the 2025 E-Waste World, Battery Recycling, Metal Recycling, and ITAD & Circular Electronics Conference & Expo events in Frankfurt, Germany.

Speaking in the ITAD & Circular Electronics track on a panel with global Circular Economy leaders from Foxway Group, ERI and HP, we explored the evolving role of IT asset disposition (ITAD) and opportunities in the circular electronics economy.

The event’s focus on advancing circular economy goals and reducing environmental impact delivered a series of insights and learnings. From this assembly of international expertise across 75+ countries, here are some points from the presentations that stood out for me:

1. Environmental impact of the digital economy

Digitalisation has a heavy material footprint in the production phase, and lifecycle thinking needs to guide every product decision. Consider that 81% of the energy a laptop uses in its lifetime is consumed during manufacture (1 tonne in manufacture is equal to 10,000 tonnes of CO2) and laptops are typically refreshed or replaced by companies every 3–4 years.

From 2018 to 2023, the average number of devices and connections per capita in the world increased by 50% (2.4 to 3.6). In North America (8.2 to 13.4) and Western Europe (5.6 to 9.4), this almost doubled. In 1960, only 10 periodic table elements were used to make phones. In 1990, 27 elements were used and now over 60 elements are used to build the smartphones that we have become so reliant on.

A key challenge is that low-carbon and digital technologies largely compete for the same minerals. Material resource extraction could increase 60% between 2020 and 2060, while demand for lithium, cobalt and graphite is expected to rise by 500% until 2050.

High growth in ICT demand and Internet requires more attention to the environmental footprint of the digital economy. Energy consumption of data centres is expected to more than double by 2026. The electronics industry accounts for over 4% of global GHG — and digitalisation-related waste is growing, with skewed impacts on developing countries.

E-waste is rising five times faster than recycling — 1 tonne of e-waste has a carbon footprint of 2 tonnes. Today’s solution? ‘Bury it or burn it.’ In terms of spent emissions, waste and the costs associated with end-of-life liabilities, PCBAs (printed circuit board assembly) cost us enormously — they generally achieve 3–5% recyclability (75% of CO2 in PCBAs is from components).

2. Regulating circularity in electronics

There is good momentum across jurisdictions in right-to-repair, design and labelling regulations; recycling targets; and voluntary frameworks on circularity and eco-design.

The EU is at the forefront. EU legislation is lifting the ICT aftermarket, providing new opportunities for IT asset disposition (ITAD) businesses. To get a sense, the global market for electronics recycling is estimated to grow from $37 billion to $108 billion (2022–2030). The value of refurbished electronics is estimated to increase from $85.9 billion to $262.2 billion (2022–2032). Strikingly, 40% of companies do not have a formal ITAD strategy in place.

Significantly, the EU is rethinking its Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) management targets, aligned with upcoming circularity and WEEE legislation, as part of efforts to foster the circular economy. A more robust and realistic circularity-driven approach to setting collection targets would better reflect various factors including long lifespans of electronic products and market fluctuations.

Australia and New Zealand lag the EU’s comprehensive e-waste mandated frameworks. The lack of a systematic approach results in environmental degradation and missed positioning opportunities for businesses in the circular economy. While Australia’s Senate inquiry into waste reduction and recycling recommended legislating a full circular economy framework — including for imported and local product design, financial incentives and regulatory enforcement, New Zealand remains the only OECD country without a national scheme to manage e-waste.

3. Extending product lifecycles

Along with data security and digital tools, reuse was a key theme in the ITAD & Circular Electronics track of the conference. The sustainable tech company that I lead, Greenbox, recognises that reuse is the simplest circular strategy. Devices that are still functional undergo refurbishment and are reintroduced into the market, reducing new production need and conserving valuable resources.

Conference presenters highlighted how repair over replacement is being legislated as a right in jurisdictions around the world. Resources are saved, costs are lowered, product life is extended, and people and organisations are empowered to support a greener future. It was pointed out that just 43% of countries have recycling policies, 17% of global waste is formally recycled, and less than 1% of global e-waste is formally repaired and reused.

Right to repair is a rising wave in the circular economy, and legislation is one way that civil society is pushing back on programmed obsolescence. Its global momentum continues at different speeds for different product categories — from the recent EU mandates to multiple US state bills (and some laws) through to repair and reuse steps in India, Canada, Australia and New Zealand.

The European Commission’s Joint Research Commission has done a scoping study to identify product groups under the Ecodesign framework that would be most relevant for implementing an EU-wide product reparability scoring system.

Attending this event with the entire electronic waste recycling supply chain — from peers and partners to suppliers and customers — underscored the importance of sharing best practices to address the environmental challenges that increased hardware proliferation and complex related issues are having on the world.

Ross Thompson is Group CEO of sustainability, data management and technology asset lifecycle management market leader Greenbox. With facilities in Brisbane, Sydney, Melbourne, Canberra, Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch, Greenbox Group provides customers all over the world a carbon-neutral supply chain for IT equipment to reduce their carbon footprint by actively managing their environmental, social and governance obligations.

Image credit: iStock.com/Mustafa Ovec

Renewables Helped Prevent Blackouts on New England’s Hottest Day This Summer

Renewables Helped Prevent Blackouts on New England’s Hottest Day This Summer

Renewable energy sources, such as solar power and battery storage, have helped keep power on in New England, even during peak demand on the hottest day of summer. According to a recent report from the nonprofit Acadia Center, more than 5 gigawatts of behind-the-meter solar provided additional support during peak demand times, despite the temperature […]
The post Renewables Helped Prevent Blackouts on New England’s Hottest Day This Summer appeared first on EcoWatch.

0 Comments