Search

3 ways tariffs will affect sustainable supply chains

We are an online community created around a smart and easy to access information hub which is focused on providing proven global and local insights about sustainability

15 Apr, 2025

This post was originally published on Green Biz

Source: Green Biz

Key takeaways

  • Supply chain shifts from tariffs could affect a company’s ability to collect data on the impact of value chains and shift carbon disclosure goal timeframes.
  • Compliance on human-rights initiatives and ethical business practices could vary if supply chains move location.
  • Companies committed to ESG performance likely will let political issues shake out before determining next steps.

The U.S. administration’s introduction (and delay) of sweeping tariffs already is showing signs of disrupting global trade. Of course, addressing the fundamental economic challenges the tariffs represent will be top of mind for all companies, but it’s important to note that the redrawn trade patterns and alliances will also likely change how companies approach their efforts to ensure supply chains meet their standards for environmental, social and governance-related performance. 

In addition to the standard business imperatives of cost, quality and timeliness, most global corporations have already invested significant resources into mapping their value chains. Forward-looking companies have also engaged with suppliers on a wide range of issues including climate reporting and performance, human rights-related issues and ethical business practices.

But as customers and suppliers come to grips with a new economic landscape, it may require them to change suppliers to ensure they can remain economically competitive. 

A supply chain reshuffle 

According to our conversations with several global companies in the pharmaceuticals, software and manufacturing sectors, it’s still too early to predict the exact impacts of tariffs. However, all see the following three scenarios as possible, if not likely, if tariffs remain in place for any significant period.

  • Supply chain shifts could affect data collection: Global corporations have invested substantially in building relationships with suppliers who share or at least agree to support efforts to obtain relevant data regarding the impacts of their value chains. The new economic calculus that the tariffs represent will almost certainly result in substantial portions of global supply chains being restructured and new relationships being put in place. This will affect mutual agreements on what information is provided by suppliers to customers – such as carbon metrics, health and safety information, human rights-related data and other sustainability measurements. Many of these ESG data collection processes will need to be rebuilt to some extent and may result in a disruption of data availability for some time. 
  • Changing carbon disclosures and goal timeframes: Various goal-setting regimes, including those administered by the Science Based Targets Initiative (SBTi), often have a requirement for companies to set goals related to the emissions that originate in their supply chain. To meet these goals, companies often will encourage their suppliers to set their own goals. However, if companies have to identify new suppliers to mitigate the impact of tariffs, most of these agreements will need to be renegotiated, putting those companies who have set such goals at risk of not being able to accomplish them in the time frame expected. This may result in reputational damage to those not able to meet their original commitments. 
  • Compliance unknowns for suppliers and manufacturers alike: The onshoring of supply chains in response to tariffs may result in easier compliance with various human rights and anti-corruption requirements. That’s because many companies have built sophisticated operations to protect working conditions and uphold ethical business practices. If supply chains are moved geographically closer — presumably to where the regulatory environment is similar to the purchaser — then there’s the chance we could see a net benefit from such tariffs. On the flip side, if a company requires certain raw materials that only originate from specific countries as an essential component to their manufacturing process, it’s also possible there could be a “race to the bottom” — where companies are tempted to source materials from anywhere, regardless of the supplier’s commitment to human rights and ethical business practices. 

Doubling down on values

It’s clear we’re in a highly disruptive period for businesses, particularly for those committed to sustainable business practices. If you couple tariffs with an administration that’s clearly inclined to deregulate sustainability-relevant issues, then progress towards a more sustainable future may be more difficult for the next few years. 

That’s why companies should prioritize their most important “non-negotiables” — be it human rights, basic carbon data and/or anti-corruption efforts — and stick to their values on these. Then let the political issues shake out before determining the next best steps. 

Regardless, the business case for sustainable practices remains clear. Forward-looking companies that have already committed to visibility and traceability in their supply chain will be better positioned to navigate these disruptions and quickly adapt to the new global supply chain landscape. 

[Connect with more than 3,500 professionals decarbonizing and future-proofing their organizations and supply chains through climate technologies at VERGE, Oct. 28-30, San Jose.]

The post 3 ways tariffs will affect sustainable supply chains appeared first on Trellis.

Pass over the stars to rate this post. Your opinion is always welcome.
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

You may also like…

Circularity roadmap for construction industry announced

Circularity roadmap for construction industry announced

World Green Building Council (WorldGBC) has launched the Asia Pacific Regional Network (APN) Resources and Circularity Readiness Framework, presented at the WorldGBC hosted accelerator session, ‘Retrofitting buildings: Lessons from a global network’, as part of the World Circular Economy Forum 2025 (WCEF2025), a global event dedicated to the circular economy.

Developed by WorldGBC’s APN of 17 Green Building Councils (GBCs) as well as knowledge partners, the framework is a practical roadmap aimed at policymakers and businesses across the region to assess their circularity readiness and identify strategic priorities for action to decarbonise their building stock on both a national and regional scale.

The framework can be used as a tool to quantify the business case for circular, sustainable principles in the built environment, and support businesses and governments to reduce waste, conserve resources and lower carbon emissions. It shows the industry the practical steps it can take now towards circularity, based on its current capabilities. It sets out clear assessment criteria, specific readiness indicators and actionable guidance based on five interconnected elements:

Government leadership: Policies and regulations driving circularity at all levels.
Technical solutions: Innovative approaches enabling resource efficiency and circular material flows.
Data: Measurement systems tracking resource use and circularity progress.
Finance: Funding mechanisms supporting circular business models and infrastructure.
Mindset: Cultural shifts prioritising resource conservation and sustainable consumption.
 

The Framework further supports WorldGBC’s 2025–2027 strategic plan, which outlines the vision for a sustainable built environment, guided by global 2030 decarbonisation goals.

Joy Gai, Head of Asia Pacific Network, WorldGBC said, “The framework has been developed by sustainability experts from the Asia–Pacific, one of the most diverse regions in the world, which is defined by remarkable complexities of culture, building stocks and environmental conditions. Our network recognises that harnessing diversity is fundamental to shaping a more resilient, resource-efficient future — but we need a guide to show us how to put our ambition into action. That is why we developed the APN Resources and Circularity Readiness Framework.

“WorldGBC is proud to join our Green Building Councils and partners in launching this timely resource. It creates a common language to guide businesses through collaboration, identifying their needs and applying circular methods which support our shared vision for a sustainable and regenerative future for Asia–Pacific and beyond.”

Jeff Oatman, chair of the Asia Pacific Regional network, Head of Collaboration and membership at Green Building Council of Australia (GBCA), added, “The Resources and Circularity Readiness Framework is a timely and much-needed initiative to accelerate the transition to a more regenerative and resource-efficient built environment across our region. By offering a clear pathway for assessing readiness and driving action, it empowers governments, industry and communities to make smarter, more sustainable decisions around circularity. I’m proud to be part of this collaboration and to contribute to a tool that not only fosters innovation but also supports practical outcomes that matter for people and the planet.”

Takuji Kohama, Chief Representative, AGC Group for Asia Pacific, also commented, “A resilient built environment relies on understanding ecological interconnections and making a conscious shift from linear consumption to cyclical resource stewardship. Designing buildings and infrastructures with their lifecycle in mind maximises material efficiency and minimises waste through a holistic approach from resource sourcing to end-of-life. Prioritising design for disassembly, material recovery, reuse and repurpose transforms buildings into dynamic material banks, significantly reducing construction’s environmental impact and fostering economic and environmental sustainability.

“Participating in the formulation of Resources and Circularity Readiness Framework offers a practical path to sustainable growth in our resource-constrained and climate-challenged region. This framework empowers built environment stakeholders to adopt a regenerative, resilient mindset focused on long-term value creation, redefining design, construction and living beyond waste minimisation. We aim to catalyse greater collaboration, innovation and systemic change, positioning AGC as a regional leader in circular economy practices and a model for urban sustainability.”

GBCs will use the framework to assess their own readiness to accelerate the transition to a circular economy in the built environment, as well as supporting the Asia–Pacific market. To find out more, head to the Green Building Council of Australia website.

Image credit: iStock.com/Benjamas Deekam

0 Comments