Search

3 strategies for 2 crises: Tackling carbon emissions and packaging waste together

We are an online community created around a smart and easy to access information hub which is focused on providing proven global and local insights about sustainability

29 Apr, 2025

This post was originally published on Green Biz

Source: Green Biz

If you’re tuned into corporate sustainability, you probably hear companies talk about net-zero targets all the time. You probably also hear companies talk about efforts to prevent plastic pollution and improve packaging recyclability. But how often do you hear companies try to link these efforts together?

It’s a huge missed opportunity. Packaging waste and carbon emissions are two sides of the same coin — the materials used for transport and disposal carry a carbon cost across its life cycle. Understanding this connection is key for making meaningful progress on both fronts. 

While the sustainable packaging community has been busy setting sustainability goals to hit recycling or sustainable sourcing targets, it can feel like the industry has forgotten where these goals are supposed to take us: to a world where we have carbon emissions and waste under control. 

Understanding packaging’s contribution to carbon emissions 

Packaging, as most of us know, heavily contributes to the climate crisis. 

In 2019, plastics contributed more emissions than the aviation and shipping industries combined. According to the OECD, the supply chain of plastics generated 3.4 percent of all global greenhouse gas emissions, and 90 percent of this came from production and conversion from fossil fuels. 

If plastics were a country, they would have the fifth-largest share of global emissions as of 2022, just below China, the U.S., India and Russia. Although many plastics go into products that aren’t packaging, if we look at the rest of the packaging value chain — glass, aluminum, fiber, bioplastics — the total carbon footprint of packaging would be even larger. 

Right now, the consequences of packaging’s waste and carbon emissions are treated in siloes. Waste is framed as a pollution problem, carbon as a climate one — and companies are left to piece together fragmented strategies instead of unified solutions. But we can tackle climate change by using sustainable packaging efforts through the following strategies. 

Fold your packaging goals and wins into your climate strategy

Too often, sustainable packaging does the hard work of decarbonizing without getting credit for it. It’s time to change that. Reducing packaging material avoids emissions, and this should be counted towards emissions targets. Redesigning packaging so that it doesn’t go to landfills is a win for your carbon goals, too. 

Embedding packaging goals and calculations into your climate strategy is the first step. If you don’t know where to start, use Life Cycle Assessment tools and packaging calculators to calculate the avoided emissions of a packaging change.

Make it clear — to colleagues, consumers and investors — how your packaging efforts are part of your climate strategy. Unilever’s Scope 3 GHG reduction plan, for example, shows how packaging is helping them to meet their 2030 target of reducing absolute Scope 3 emissions by 30-40 percent.

Think differently about tradeoffs

Right now, when we design packaging to be recyclable and the change creates more emissions, this is called a tradeoff. Companies feel they have to pick one direction, and based on pressure from consumers, they often choose recyclability. If a package has no good end-of-life option but a lower carbon footprint (like a not yet recyclable plastic bag, for example), this is considered another unfortunate, but necessary tradeoff. 

Instead, what if we thought about tradeoffs like we think about flying with a layover? Layovers aren’t your final destination — they’re just a sometimes necessary stop along the way. Making short-term sustainability tradeoffs is a layover on our path toward a future with reduced waste and carbon emissions in packaging. 

Companies don’t have to wait to address both crises, either. Already, companies such as Prana are adopting practices — such as using seaweed-based compostable packaging — to address both waste and carbon emissions. 

Go for the big swings

What’s the single biggest swing companies can take to address both climate and packaging waste? Reduction. While switching to a “better” single-use material — renewable feedstock or recycled content — may seem like a step forward, it’s ultimately only an incremental change. 

The future of sustainable packaging hinges on whether companies truly understand and embrace the importance of reduction and system redesign. By reducing the amount of packaging used in the first place and redesigning packaging to be reusable or refillable, companies can significantly lower resource use, carbon emissions and environmental impact. And you can take comfort knowing that your company won’t be the first to do this. Companies such as beverage giant Diageo are already finding ways to scale circular, reusable packaging.  

Right now, we’re wasting our time in transit. If we meet these opportunities — by folding our packaging and climate goals together, rethinking tradeoffs and taking big swings — we’ll reach that future with reduced waste and carbon emissions.

For more on reducing and eliminating waste in the global economy, stay tuned for Circularity 2025 starting Tuesday. 

The post 3 strategies for 2 crises: Tackling carbon emissions and packaging waste together appeared first on Trellis.

Pass over the stars to rate this post. Your opinion is always welcome.
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

You may also like…

‘The Science Is What Sets Us Apart’: How the Rodale Institute Has Spent 77 Years Innovating Regenerative Organic Agriculture

‘The Science Is What Sets Us Apart’: How the Rodale Institute Has Spent 77 Years Innovating Regenerative Organic Agriculture

Founded in 1947 by J.I. Rodale, Rodale Institute is a nonprofit dedicated to helping the regenerative organic agriculture movement grow through research, education and farmer training. In his study of regenerative organic farming, Rodale — who came up with the term “organic” — studied Indigenous agricultural practices, including those of communities like the long-lived Hunza […]
The post ‘The Science Is What Sets Us Apart’: How the Rodale Institute Has Spent 77 Years Innovating Regenerative Organic Agriculture appeared first on EcoWatch.

Urban 'placemaking' focus for $85m recreation centre

Urban 'placemaking' focus for $85m recreation centre

Sydney developer Billbergia Group has announced the Rhodes Recreation Centre — an $85 million, 9200 m2 multi-purpose community hub in Sydney’s Inner West.

Located at 6 Gauthorpe St and designed by architectural firm SJB, the recreation centre is in a three-level podium building beneath two high-rise residential towers — the 48-level Peake and 43-level Oasis. Together, they form stage two of the developer’s Rhodes Central Masterplan — a $3 billion, three-stage town centre project.

The Rhodes Recreation Centre was delivered under a $97 million Voluntary Planning Agreement (VPA) between the developer and City of Canada Bay Council. It will be handed over to council next month and is set to open later this year. Once complete, the masterplan will have delivered 25,000 m2 of dedicated public amenity, including retail, community facilities and open space.

With the NSW Government’s housing reforms set to address the housing shortage, the recreation centre will reflect the importance of ‘placemaking’ — a collaborative approach to designing and managing public spaces that enhances community wellbeing and fosters connections between people and their environment — in planning new urban communities.

It also presents a pathway for public and private sectors to collaborate and create social infrastructure while increasing housing supply in fast-growing suburbs.

The recreation centre is set to add vibrancy and pedestrian activity to the local streetscape, providing a diverse range of facilities that enhance the livability of the evolving suburb. These community amenities include two full-sized indoor sports courts, a gymnastics centre, a 70-place childcare centre, a community lounge, allied health services, and bookable spaces for local groups and events. It also provides a gym with cardio equipment, weights, group fitness rooms, a creche and an outdoor terrace, alongside a range of sustainability features.

Facilities at the Rhodes Recreation Centre. Images supplied.

“Rhodes Recreation Centre is the community heart of our high-density TOD development, bringing to life Billbergia’s vision for a future-focused, livable urban environment that prioritises amenity, not just density,” said Saul Moran, Development Director – Planning and Design at Billbergia.

The amenities within the two residential towers include a swimming pool, spa, sauna, children’s play area, library and theatre rooms. Pedestrian connections and through-site links provide access to Rhodes railway station and the Homebush Bay waterfront.

“The Rhodes Recreation Centre stands as a benchmark in successful public–private collaboration. Through a VPA with Canada Bay Council, we’ve created a pathway to unlock additional housing supply while delivering significant, lasting community infrastructure. It’s a clear demonstration of how thoughtful public and private partnerships can shape vibrant, livable neighbourhoods,” Moran said.

Located adjacent to Rhodes railway station, stage one of Billbergia’s Rhodes Central Masterplan was completed in 2021 and included the 13,000 m2 Rhodes Central Shopping Centre, with convenience retail, a Woolworths supermarket, medical facilities and the Bamboo Lane dining precinct.

Other previous projects include the 1.2 ha Phoenix Park in Rhodes, the $63 million Bennelong Bridge, the popular Baylink Shuttle service, the 3500 m2 Wentworth Point Community Centre and Library, and the Wentworth Point Pop-Up Town Square.

Billbergia’s ongoing focus on placemaking and social infrastructure also includes the $8.4 million delivery of a library at its mixed-tenure development, Arncliffe Central, in Sydney’s south. There is the potential for 75% of Arncliffe Central’s dwellings to be dedicated to social, affordable and essential worker rental housing, along with 3400 m2 allocated to childcare, convenience retail and cafes, and a 4000 m2 park with play space for both residents and the broader community.

Top image caption: The Rhodes Recreation Centre location with two planned residential towers, Peake and Oasis. Image supplied.

0 Comments