Search

10 Fast Fashion Brands We Avoid At All Costs

We are an online community created around a smart and easy to access information hub which is focused on providing proven global and local insights about sustainability

17 Sep, 2024

This post was originally published on Good on You

Our editors curate highly rated brands that are first assessed by our rigorous ratings system. Buying through our links may earn us a commission—supporting the work we do. Learn more.

 

Fast—and ultra fast—fashion brands follow a destructive business model and do and say almost nothing about sustainability. In this article, we’re looking at the ones that have published little to no relevant or concrete information about their impact or supply chains, and as a result, are rated “We Avoid” against Good On You’s methodology.

A world of overproduction and microtrends

Big brands like Zara, H&M, Forever 21, and Topshop have long been known as fast fashion companies, and sustainability advocates have spent years pushing to hold them accountable for their poor practices and excessive waste. But what actually is fast fashion? It’s more than just a business category—it’s a model of cheaply mass-producing “of-the-moment” items that are sold at low price points. These items are made poorly—often using unsustainable synthetic materials like polyester, so they rarely last beyond a few wears and need to be replaced quickly with newer and trendier items, which are marketed aggressively to consumers.

And now there’s a new wave of brands that have picked up the same destructive business model and sped it up even more, producing and marketing faster than ever, selling products for less than £1, and using unsafe materials that have been found to contain toxic chemicals—all while doing and saying almost nothing about sustainability. They are the ultra fast fashion brands.

What’s the impact of fast fashion?

Fast fashion’s impact on the planet, people, and animals is enormous. The pressure to reduce costs and speed up production time means that environmental corners are cut: cheap dyes that contain harsh chemicals are used, and the system creates an alarming amount of textile waste that often ends up in landfill.

Garment workers have also been found to work in dangerous environments for low wages, and without basic human rights. Animals are also impacted by fast fashion, from their skin and fur being used to make products, to the chemicals and microfibres that are released in waterways and ingested by ocean life.

Finally, fast fashion impacts consumers themselves. Influential marketing campaigns, weekly product drops, and gamified shopping experiences work to convince people they need to buy more and more to stay on top of trends, creating a constant sense of need and ultimate dissatisfaction.

The fast fashion brands we avoid at all costs

Besides the big names, other brands use the same unethical fast fashion model but have largely escaped the criticism that has followed the likes of Topshop around. That means they haven’t even had to think about doing the right thing, and they have little to no relevant or concrete information on their websites about their supply chains, which is why they are rated “We Avoid”.

In some cases, the brand may even make ambiguous claims that look like greenwashing. Transparency is the first step towards a more sustainable business, and we think you have a right to comprehensive and accurate information about how a brand impacts on people, the planet, and animals. That’s why, in our ratings, we only use the information that brands are prepared to make public for everyone to read.

So what are the worst fast fashion brands? Scroll on to find out.

The post 10 Fast Fashion Brands We Avoid At All Costs appeared first on Good On You.

Pass over the stars to rate this post. Your opinion is always welcome.
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

You may also like…

ABB receives EPD status for gearless mill drive ring motor

ABB receives EPD status for gearless mill drive ring motor

ABB has gained Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) status for its Gearless Mill Drive (GMD) ring motor — technology used to drive large grinding mills in the mining industry.

An EPD is a standardised document that provides detailed information about the environmental impact of a product throughout its life cycle. Based on a comprehensive Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) study, the EPD highlights ABB’s commitment to transparency, environmental responsibility and supporting customers in making informed decisions on sustainability in their supply chains.

ABB analysed the environmental impact of a ring motor across its entire life cycle from supply chain and production to usage and end-of-life disposal. The study was conducted for a ring motor of a semi-autogenous grinding (SAG) mill with an installed power of 24 MW and was based on a reference service life of 25 years.

“Sustainability is at the core of our purpose at ABB, influencing how we operate and innovate for customers,” said Andrea Quinta, Sustainability Specialist at ABB. “By earning the Environmental Product Declaration for our ring motor, we emphasise our environmental stewardship and industry leadership for this technology. We adhered to the highest standards throughout this process, as we do in the ABB Ring Motor factory every day. This recognition highlights to the mining industry what they are bringing into their own operations when they work with ABB.”

The comprehensive LCA was conducted at ABB’s factory in Bilbao, Spain, and was externally verified and published in accordance with international standards ISO 14025 and ISO 14040/14044. It will remain valid for five years.

The ring motor, a key component of the GMD, is a drive system without any gears where the transmission of the torque between the motor and the mill is done through the magnetic field in the air gap between the motor stator and the motor rotor. It optimises grinding applications in the minerals and mining industries by enabling variable-speed operation, leading to energy and cost savings.

The full EPD for the ABB GMD Ring Motor can be viewed on EPD International.

Bee Hotels Can Help Native Pollinators Recover in the Wake of Climate-Fueled Wildfires: Study

Bee Hotels Can Help Native Pollinators Recover in the Wake of Climate-Fueled Wildfires: Study

Wild pollinator populations are declining all over the world, with increasingly severe climate change-fueled wildfires threatening their survival. These intense wildfires are also putting long-term ecosystem health and biodiversity at risk. Bee hotels are artificial nesting structures that have been specially designed to house cavity-nesting species. Often placed in backyards or gardens, they provide safe […]
The post Bee Hotels Can Help Native Pollinators Recover in the Wake of Climate-Fueled Wildfires: Study appeared first on EcoWatch.

0 Comments