Search

10 Fast Fashion Brands We Avoid At All Costs

We are an online community created around a smart and easy to access information hub which is focused on providing proven global and local insights about sustainability

17 Sep, 2024

This post was originally published on Good on You

Our editors curate highly rated brands that are first assessed by our rigorous ratings system. Buying through our links may earn us a commission—supporting the work we do. Learn more.

 

Fast—and ultra fast—fashion brands follow a destructive business model and do and say almost nothing about sustainability. In this article, we’re looking at the ones that have published little to no relevant or concrete information about their impact or supply chains, and as a result, are rated “We Avoid” against Good On You’s methodology.

A world of overproduction and microtrends

Big brands like Zara, H&M, Forever 21, and Topshop have long been known as fast fashion companies, and sustainability advocates have spent years pushing to hold them accountable for their poor practices and excessive waste. But what actually is fast fashion? It’s more than just a business category—it’s a model of cheaply mass-producing “of-the-moment” items that are sold at low price points. These items are made poorly—often using unsustainable synthetic materials like polyester, so they rarely last beyond a few wears and need to be replaced quickly with newer and trendier items, which are marketed aggressively to consumers.

And now there’s a new wave of brands that have picked up the same destructive business model and sped it up even more, producing and marketing faster than ever, selling products for less than £1, and using unsafe materials that have been found to contain toxic chemicals—all while doing and saying almost nothing about sustainability. They are the ultra fast fashion brands.

What’s the impact of fast fashion?

Fast fashion’s impact on the planet, people, and animals is enormous. The pressure to reduce costs and speed up production time means that environmental corners are cut: cheap dyes that contain harsh chemicals are used, and the system creates an alarming amount of textile waste that often ends up in landfill.

Garment workers have also been found to work in dangerous environments for low wages, and without basic human rights. Animals are also impacted by fast fashion, from their skin and fur being used to make products, to the chemicals and microfibres that are released in waterways and ingested by ocean life.

Finally, fast fashion impacts consumers themselves. Influential marketing campaigns, weekly product drops, and gamified shopping experiences work to convince people they need to buy more and more to stay on top of trends, creating a constant sense of need and ultimate dissatisfaction.

The fast fashion brands we avoid at all costs

Besides the big names, other brands use the same unethical fast fashion model but have largely escaped the criticism that has followed the likes of Topshop around. That means they haven’t even had to think about doing the right thing, and they have little to no relevant or concrete information on their websites about their supply chains, which is why they are rated “We Avoid”.

In some cases, the brand may even make ambiguous claims that look like greenwashing. Transparency is the first step towards a more sustainable business, and we think you have a right to comprehensive and accurate information about how a brand impacts on people, the planet, and animals. That’s why, in our ratings, we only use the information that brands are prepared to make public for everyone to read.

So what are the worst fast fashion brands? Scroll on to find out.

The post 10 Fast Fashion Brands We Avoid At All Costs appeared first on Good On You.

Pass over the stars to rate this post. Your opinion is always welcome.
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

You may also like…

“AI Will Change Everything About Nuclear” as US Lab Partners With Amazon Cloud to Build the First Smart Reactors in American History

IN A NUTSHELL 🔧 Idaho National Laboratory partners with Amazon Web Services to develop AI-powered digital twins for nuclear reactors. 💡 The collaboration aims to modernize the U.S. nuclear sector, making reactors autonomous and efficient. 🌐 The initiative is part of a national push to integrate artificial intelligence into energy infrastructure. 🔍 Focus on safety, […]
The post “AI Will Change Everything About Nuclear” as US Lab Partners With Amazon Cloud to Build the First Smart Reactors in American History appeared first on Sustainability Times.

Government consulting on sustainable investment labelling

Government consulting on sustainable investment labelling

The Australian Government is starting consultation on sustainable investment product labelling, which is designed to give investors more confidence to put more capital to work in sustainable products.

The federal government said the release of this paper is a key step in implementing its Sustainable Finance Roadmap — designed to help mobilise the capital required for Australia to become a renewable energy superpower, modernising the financial markets and maximising the economic opportunities from net zero.

This consultation paper seeks views from investors, companies and the broader community on a framework for sustainable investment product labels.

These labels are designed to help investors and consumers identify, compare and make informed decisions about sustainable investment products to understand what ‘sustainable’, ‘green’ or similar words mean when they’re applied to financial products.

The government said a more robust and clear product-labelling framework will help investors and consumers invest in sustainable products with confidence and help tackle greenwashing.

This phase of consultation will run from 18 July to 29 August and help the government refine its design principles for the framework.

The consultation paper is available on the Treasury consultation hub.

Image credit: iStock.com/wenich-mit

0 Comments