Introduction to Nike

Nike, a global leader in athletic footwear and apparel, has embarked on sustainability initiatives to reduce its environmental impact, focusing on areas such as carbon footprint reduction, energy efficiency, recycling, waste management, and water sustainability.

Despite progress in waste reduction, critics highlight shortcomings in cutting emissions across its supply chain and addressing worker exploitation issues in its factories.

While transparency in its supply chain practices is increasingly demanded, Nike faces criticism for greenwashing and non-biodegradable materials. To drive impactful change, Nike must prioritize sustainability, address these concerns, and foster greater transparency and collaboration across the industry

Just Do It!

Criteria

Carbon Footprint, Medium

Nike is committed to reducing its carbon footprint through ambitious goals, aiming for a 30% reduction in emissions by 2030 and achieving net zero emissions by 2050. By 2020, Nike had already achieved a 25% reduction in carbon emissions per unit, putting them well on track to meet their 2030 target.

The company focuses on energy efficiency, sustainable product design, and collaboration with suppliers to drive environmental responsibility throughout its operations. Nike’s efforts include using sustainable materials, renewable energy adoption, and innovative partnerships to achieve its sustainability targets.

Ecological Impact, High

Nike’s ecological impact initiatives are marked by robust sustainability measures aimed at reducing its environmental footprint. Initiatives like the Reuse-a-Shoe program underscore Nike’s commitment to recycling, while ambitious targets to integrate 50% environmentally preferred materials, such as recycled polyester, into its products by 2025 highlight its dedication to sustainable sourcing.

Moreover, Nike is actively working to eliminate hazardous chemicals from its supply chain by 2025, demonstrating its proactive approach to minimizing environmental pollution. Despite these efforts, transparency concerns persist within Nike’s supply chain practices. However, the company has taken significant steps to address waste management issues, notably achieving an 84% reduction in dunnage waste at its distribution centers by 2021 and eliminating plastic bags from its global retail stores.

Additionally, Nike’s conversion of its European Logistics Campus to 100% non-plastic packaging further underscores its commitment to reducing environmental impact. While commendable progress has been made, Nike acknowledges the need for further improvement, particularly in enhancing transparency, refining waste management strategies, and scaling sustainability efforts for greater ecological stewardship.

Energy Consumption, High

Nike is actively reducing energy consumption and transitioning to clean energy sources. They have made significant progress by operating their facilities on 93% renewable electricity, resulting in a 40% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. Nike’s goal is to achieve 100% renewable energy usage by 2025, through partnerships with factories using rooftop solar power units in Indonesia, Vietnam, and China.

Additionally, their Sustainable Manufacturing & Sourcing program collaborates with manufacturers to drive carbon reduction and promote the use of solar PV systems.

Freight Density, Medium

Nike optimizes freight density by reducing air shipments in favor of cost-effective ground shipping methods. They invest in technologies and strategies for upstream cost optimization, integrating data analytics for efficiency throughout the supply chain. Sustainability initiatives include managing Scope 3 emissions and collaborating with suppliers to reduce environmental impact.

Recycling Rates, High

Nike incorporates recycled materials into 73% of their footwear and apparel, with 92% of rubber being environmentally friendly. They divert 97% of manufacturing waste from landfills, with 72% being recycled. Ambitious targets are set to increase rubber recycling rates, aiming for a 10% recycling rate.

Nike generated 882 metric tons of waste at its global headquarters in FY2022, emphasizing ongoing waste management strategies.

Saving Levels, Medium

As mentioned before, in 2015, Nike set a goal to reduce its carbon emissions by 30% across its global supply chain by 2030. By 2020, Nike had already achieved a 25% reduction in carbon emissions per unit, putting them well on track to meet their 2030 target.

Specific Product Monitoring, Medium

Nike utilizes key performance indicators (KPIs) and dashboards to monitor its sustainability impact and track the effectiveness of its initiatives. These metrics include customer retention rate, market share, and carbon emissions reduction. By analyzing KPIs, Nike aims to enhance its sustainability practices and minimize its environmental footprint. Initiatives like Nike Forward and Recycle-A-Shoe highlight the brand’s commitment to sustainability and innovation.

Debuting in Nike Town London, B.I.L.L. (Bot Initiated Longevity Lab), is a robot-augmented system designed to clean and repair shoes with selected customizations.

Supply Chain Waste, High

Nike has prioritized sustainability within its supply chain, aiming for zero waste and emphasizing circularity through its “Move to Zero” initiative. The brand recycles materials extensively, transforming billions of plastic water bottles into footwear and apparel and saving water through innovative technologies like ColorDry, which dyes fabric without water usage.

One of Nike’s significant achievements in sustainable manufacturing includes using Flyknit technology, which has reduced waste by 60% compared to traditional methods. Additionally, Nike sets ambitious sustainability targets for its supplier factories and guides product creation through its Material Sustainability Index. Overall, Nike’s commitment to sustainability spans waste reduction, recycling, supplier sustainability, and informed material selection, reflecting a comprehensive approach to environmental responsibility.

Sustainability Scorecards, Low

Based on the comprehensive assessment of Nike’s environmental and social practices provided earlier, Ethos ESG assigns Nike a score of 60, evaluating aspects such as deforestation, labor practices, and environmental controversies. The platform concludes that Nike is an average overall performer.

With a ‘C’ rating of 59.6 for overall impact (62nd percentile compared to all companies). Additionally, the brand receives a rating of 23 out of 100 on the Eco-Stylist website. While Nike has demonstrated commitment to material innovation, there is room for improvement, particularly regarding the well-being and pay of garment workers.

Water Management, Medium

Nike is actively managing its water usage and enhancing water sustainability. The brand intended to reduce the water consumption in its entire supply chain by 20% per unit by 2020.

Significant reductions have been achieved, with a 30% decrease in freshwater use in certain areas. Through innovative practices, Nike has cut freshwater use per kilogram of textile by 25%. Collaborative efforts with suppliers have also led to substantial reductions in water usage. Nike’s commitment to water sustainability is evident through its efficiency improvements and collaborative initiatives across its supply chain.

Conclusion

Nike’s sustainability initiatives reflect a comprehensive commitment to reducing its environmental impact across various facets of its operations. While the company has made commendable progress in areas such as waste reduction, recycling, and water management, some areas require further improvement, notably in cutting emissions across its supply chain and enhancing transparency in its practices.

Despite facing criticism, Nike’s dedication to sustainability is evident through its ambitious goals, innovative partnerships, and ongoing efforts to drive meaningful change. Moving forward, continued focus on addressing these challenges, along with greater transparency and collaboration, will be key to advancing Nike’s sustainability agenda and fostering a more environmentally responsible future.

Nike has achieved a respectable 3.25/5 rating for its sustainability efforts, showing progress in waste reduction but facing criticism for emissions and labor issues. Challenges remain in transparency and greenwashing practices, highlighting the need for improvement and increased collaboration within the industry.

Related to other brands

Number of criteria met by each brand:

ESCP Business School Team

Research developed by five curious international ESCP Business School students who have worked together to successfully complete their consulting project. They analysed four brands in four different categories -20 brands: sneakers, pod coffee, jeans, makeup, and chocolate, according to 10 environmental criteria.

Sources