Search

How Ethical Is Ralph Lauren?

We are an online community created around a smart and easy to access information hub which is focused on providing proven global and local insights about sustainability

25 Oct, 2023

This post was originally published on Good on You

Our editors curate highly rated brands that are first assessed by our rigorous ratings system. Buying through our links may earn us a commission—supporting the work we do. Learn more.

 

Ralph Lauren, the iconic American fashion brand known for its classic and sophisticated designs, has long been a staple in the wardrobes of many fashion-conscious individuals. But it has a long way to go on sustainability and ensuring workers are paid living wages. Here we delve into the brand’s “Not Good Enough” rating, which was published in July 2023 and may not reflect claims the brand has made since then. Our ratings analysts are constantly rerating the thousands of brands you can check on our directory.

‘Quality and timeless elegance’, but how are its ethics?

From mid-range to luxury, American brand Ralph Lauren has been marketing and distributing products across apparel, home, accessories, and fragrances since its founding in 1967.

The popular company is known for its designs rooted in “quality and timeless elegance”, and while there’s no denying the impact the brand has had on fashion across the world, its ethical and sustainable practices leave a lot to be desired.

So how exactly is Ralph Lauren impacting people, the planet, and animals? We ask, how ethical is Ralph Lauren?

Environmental impact

Ralph Lauren starts off with a middling “It’s a Start” score for its environmental impact. This area of the rating considers various aspects of the brand’s environmental footprint and policies throughout its supply chain. While there are areas showing promise, there’s still work to do.

Ralph Lauren uses limited lower-impact materials in its products, and could certainly make some changes there. On a positive note, the brand has set science-based targets aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions, both in its direct operations and within the supply chain, and claims to be on track. However, the effectiveness of these goals in practice remains to be seen.

The brand offers consumers the option of clothing recycling, demonstrating a willingness to engage in circular fashion practices. Unfortunately, there is a lack of clear reporting on the results of these recycling initiatives, leaving room for improvement in transparency.

Ralph Lauren has also set an ambitious target to eliminate hazardous chemicals from its supply chain by 2025. However, as of now, there is limited evidence to suggest that the brand is making significant progress toward achieving this important goal.

Labour conditions

Unfortunately, Ralph Lauren is rated “Not Good Enough” for workers. The brand’s performance here raises significant concerns regarding worker rights, transparency, and wage equality.

One noteworthy issue is the lack of certification for any part of Ralph Lauren’s supply chain by critical labour standards that safeguard worker health, safety, and wages. This lack of certification means the brand can’t ensure decent working conditions throughout its operations.

Ralph Lauren received a score of 51%-60% in the 2023 Fashion Transparency Index, which is a step up from its previous result. But while the brand has introduced a basic policy to support diversity and inclusion within its direct operations and supply chain, there is room for enhancing the comprehensiveness and effectiveness of these initiatives.

Most concerningly, while Ralph Lauren claims to have implemented programs to improve wages, there’s no evidence to confirm that workers receive living wages in most of its supply chain.

Animal welfare

When it comes to animal welfare, Ralph Lauren is also rated “Not Good Enough”. This score centres on the brand’s animal welfare policies and its ability to trace animal-derived products in its supply chain.

The brand doesn’t appear to use fur or angora, two materials often associated with animal welfare concerns. Additionally, Ralph Lauren traces some animal-derived materials to the first production stage, providing a level of transparency in its supply chain. And while it uses wool and down, the wool Ralph Lauren sources is certified by the Responsible Wool Standard, and the down it uses is certified by the Responsible Down Standard.

Ralph Lauren does also have a formal policy aligned with the Five Domains of animal welfare, which is positive. However, the brand’s use of extensive animal-derived materials, including leather, exotic animal skin, shearling, exotic animal hair, decorative feathers, and silk is concerning and not in alignment with a more ethical industry that is moving away from these harmful materials altogether.

Overall rating: ‘Not Good Enough’

Overall, Ralph Lauren receives an overall rating of “Not Good Enough”. While the brand has taken certain steps to address its environmental impact and animal welfare practices, there is ample room for improvement, particularly in labour conditions, transparency, and the use of lower-impact materials.

Note that Good On You ratings consider hundreds of issues, and it is not possible to list every relevant issue in a summary of the brand’s performance. For more information, see our How We Rate page and our FAQs.

See the rating.

Good swaps

“Good” and “Great” alternatives to Ralph Lauren.

The post How Ethical Is Ralph Lauren? appeared first on Good On You.

Pass over the stars to rate this post. Your opinion is always welcome.
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

You may also like…

‘Poisoning the Well’ Authors Sharon Udasin and Rachel Frazin on PFAS Contamination and Why It ‘Has Not Received the Attention It Deserves’

‘Poisoning the Well’ Authors Sharon Udasin and Rachel Frazin on PFAS Contamination and Why It ‘Has Not Received the Attention It Deserves’

In the introduction to Sharon Udasin and Rachel Frazin’s new book, Poisoning The Well: How Forever Chemicals Contaminated America, the authors cite an alarming statistic from 2015 that PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) are present in the bodies of an estimated 97% of Americans. How did we ever get to this point? Their book is […]
The post ‘Poisoning the Well’ Authors Sharon Udasin and Rachel Frazin on PFAS Contamination and Why It ‘Has Not Received the Attention It Deserves’ appeared first on EcoWatch.

Turning down the heat: how innovative cooling techniques are tackling the rising costs of AI's energy demands

Turning down the heat: how innovative cooling techniques are tackling the rising costs of AI's energy demands

As enterprises accelerate their AI investments, the energy demand of AI’s power-hungry systems is worrying both the organisations footing the power bills as well as those tasked with supplying reliable electricity. From large language models to digital twins crunching massive datasets to run accurate simulations on complex city systems, AI workloads require a tremendous amount of processing power.

Of course, at the heart of this demand are data centres, which are evolving at breakneck speed to support AI’s growing potential. The International Energy Agency’s AI and Energy Special Report recently predicted that data centre electricity consumption will double by 2030, identifying AI as the most significant driver of this increase.1

The IT leaders examining these staggering predictions are rightly zeroing in on improving the efficiency of these powerful systems. However, the lack of expertise in navigating these intricate systems, combined with the rapidity of innovative developments, is causing heads to spin. Although savvy organisations are baking efficiency considerations into IT projects at the outset, and are looking across the entire AI life cycle for opportunities to minimise impact, many don’t know where to start or are leaving efficiency gains on the table. Most are underutilising the multiple IT efficiency levers that could be pulled to reduce the environmental footprint of their IT, such as using energy-efficient software languages and optimising data use to ensure maximum data efficiency of AI workloads. Among the infrastructure innovations, one of the most exciting advancements we are seeing in data centres is direct liquid cooling (DLC). Because the systems that are running AI workloads are producing more heat, traditional air cooling simply is not enough to keep up with the demands of the superchips in the latest systems.

DLC technology pumps liquid coolants through tubes in direct contact with the processors to dissipate heat and has been proven to keep high-powered AI systems running safely. Switching to DLC has had measurable and transformative impact across multiple environments, showing reductions in cooling power consumption by nearly 90% compared to air cooling in supercomputing systems2.

Thankfully, the benefits of DLC are now also extending beyond supercomputers to reach a broader range of higher-performance servers that support both supercomputing and AI workloads. Shifting DLC from a niche offering to a more mainstream option available across more compute systems is enabling more organisations to tap into the efficiency gains made possible by DLC, which in some cases has been shown to deliver up to 65% in annual power savings3. Combining this kind of cooling innovation with new and improved power-use monitoring tools, able report highly accurate and timely insights, is becoming critical for IT teams wanting to optimise their energy use. All this is a welcome evolution for organisations grappling with rising energy costs and that are carefully considering total cost of ownership (TCO) of their IT systems, and is an area of innovation to watch in the coming years.

In Australia, this kind of technical innovation is especially timely. In March 2024, the Australian Senate established the Select Committee on Adopting Artificial Intelligence to examine the opportunities and impacts of AI technologies4. Among its findings and expert submissions was a clear concern about the energy intensity of AI infrastructure. The committee concluded that the Australian Government legislate for increased regulatory clarity, greater energy efficiency standards, and increased investment in renewable energy solutions. For AI sustainability to succeed, it must be driven by policy to set actionable standards, which then fuel innovative solutions.

Infrastructure solutions like DLC will play a critical role in making this possible — not just in reducing emissions and addressing the energy consumption challenge, but also in supporting the long-term viability of AI development across sectors. We’re already seeing this approach succeed in the real world. For example, the Pawsey Supercomputing Centre in Western Australia has adopted DLC technology to support its demanding research workloads and, in doing so, has significantly reduced energy consumption while maintaining the high performance required for AI and scientific computing. It’s a powerful example of how AI data centres can scale sustainably — and telegraphs an actionable blueprint for others to follow.

Furthermore, industry leaders are shifting how they handle the heat generated by these large computing systems in order to drive further efficiency in AI. Successfully using heat from data centres for other uses will be a vital component to mitigating both overall energy security risks and the efficiency challenges that AI introduces. Data centres are being redesigned to capture by-product heat and use it as a valuable resource, rather than dispose of it as waste heat. Several industries are already benefiting from capturing data centre heat, such as in agriculture for greenhouses, or heating buildings in healthcare and residential facilities. This has been successfully implemented in the UK with the Isambard-AI supercomputer and in Finland with the LUMI supercomputer — setting the bar for AI sustainability best practice globally.

The message is clear: as AI becomes a bigger part of digital transformation projects, so too must the consideration for resource-efficient solutions grow. AI sustainability considerations must be factored into each stage of the AI life cycle, with solutions like DLC playing a part in in a multifaceted IT sustainability blueprint.

By working together with governments to set effective and actionable environmental frameworks and benchmarks, we can encourage the growth and evolution of the AI industry, spurring dynamic innovation in solutions and data centre design for the benefit of all.

1. AI is set to drive surging electricity demand from data centres while offering the potential to transform how the energy sector works – News – IEA
2. https://www.hpe.com/us/en/newsroom/blog-post/2024/08/liquid-cooling-a-cool-approach-for-ai.html
3. HPE introduces next-generation ProLiant servers engineered for advanced security, AI automation and greater performance
4. https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Adopting_Artificial_Intelligence_AI

Image credit: iStock.com/Dragon Claws

The Rise of Chemical Recycling: What Recyclers Should Know

The Rise of Chemical Recycling: What Recyclers Should Know

During WWII, plastic appeared as a “material with 1,000 uses.” Fast forward to today, when global production of plastic has surpassed 359 million tons. While plastic has been helpful in many areas, it’s also created problems within the environment. Microscopic particles of plastic are in the soil, air, and water. They’re in animals, fish, and […]
The post The Rise of Chemical Recycling: What Recyclers Should Know appeared first on RecycleNation.

0 Comments